Cargando…
The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models
BACKGROUND: Predicting species’ potential geographical range by species distribution models (SDMs) is central to understand their ecological requirements. However, the effects of using different modeling techniques need further investigation. In order to improve the prediction effect, we need to ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25383906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112764 |
_version_ | 1782343650203664384 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Ren-Yan Kong, Xiao-Quan Huang, Min-Yi Fan, Wei-Yi Wang, Zhi-Gao |
author_facet | Duan, Ren-Yan Kong, Xiao-Quan Huang, Min-Yi Fan, Wei-Yi Wang, Zhi-Gao |
author_sort | Duan, Ren-Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Predicting species’ potential geographical range by species distribution models (SDMs) is central to understand their ecological requirements. However, the effects of using different modeling techniques need further investigation. In order to improve the prediction effect, we need to assess the predictive performance and stability of different SDMs. METHODOLOGY: We collected the distribution data of five common tree species (Pinus massoniana, Betula platyphylla, Quercus wutaishanica, Quercus mongolica and Quercus variabilis) and simulated their potential distribution area using 13 environmental variables and six widely used SDMs: BIOCLIM, DOMAIN, MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Each model run was repeated 100 times (trials). We compared the predictive performance by testing the consistency between observations and simulated distributions and assessed the stability by the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the 99% confidence interval of Kappa and AUC values. RESULTS: The mean values of AUC and Kappa from MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM trials were similar and significantly higher than those from BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), while the associated standard deviations and coefficients of variation were larger for BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), and the 99% confidence intervals for AUC and Kappa values were narrower for MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Compared to BIOCLIM and DOMAIN, other SDMs (MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM) had higher prediction accuracy, smaller confidence intervals, and were more stable and less affected by the random variable (randomly selected pseudo-absence points). CONCLUSIONS: According to the prediction performance and stability of SDMs, we can divide these six SDMs into two categories: a high performance and stability group including MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM, and a low performance and stability group consisting of BIOCLIM, and DOMAIN. We highlight that choosing appropriate SDMs to address a specific problem is an important part of the modeling process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4226630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42266302014-11-13 The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models Duan, Ren-Yan Kong, Xiao-Quan Huang, Min-Yi Fan, Wei-Yi Wang, Zhi-Gao PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Predicting species’ potential geographical range by species distribution models (SDMs) is central to understand their ecological requirements. However, the effects of using different modeling techniques need further investigation. In order to improve the prediction effect, we need to assess the predictive performance and stability of different SDMs. METHODOLOGY: We collected the distribution data of five common tree species (Pinus massoniana, Betula platyphylla, Quercus wutaishanica, Quercus mongolica and Quercus variabilis) and simulated their potential distribution area using 13 environmental variables and six widely used SDMs: BIOCLIM, DOMAIN, MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Each model run was repeated 100 times (trials). We compared the predictive performance by testing the consistency between observations and simulated distributions and assessed the stability by the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the 99% confidence interval of Kappa and AUC values. RESULTS: The mean values of AUC and Kappa from MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM trials were similar and significantly higher than those from BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), while the associated standard deviations and coefficients of variation were larger for BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), and the 99% confidence intervals for AUC and Kappa values were narrower for MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Compared to BIOCLIM and DOMAIN, other SDMs (MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM) had higher prediction accuracy, smaller confidence intervals, and were more stable and less affected by the random variable (randomly selected pseudo-absence points). CONCLUSIONS: According to the prediction performance and stability of SDMs, we can divide these six SDMs into two categories: a high performance and stability group including MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM, and a low performance and stability group consisting of BIOCLIM, and DOMAIN. We highlight that choosing appropriate SDMs to address a specific problem is an important part of the modeling process. Public Library of Science 2014-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4226630/ /pubmed/25383906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112764 Text en © 2014 Duan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duan, Ren-Yan Kong, Xiao-Quan Huang, Min-Yi Fan, Wei-Yi Wang, Zhi-Gao The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title | The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title_full | The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title_fullStr | The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title_full_unstemmed | The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title_short | The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models |
title_sort | predictive performance and stability of six species distribution models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25383906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanrenyan thepredictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT kongxiaoquan thepredictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT huangminyi thepredictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT fanweiyi thepredictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT wangzhigao thepredictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT duanrenyan predictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT kongxiaoquan predictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT huangminyi predictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT fanweiyi predictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels AT wangzhigao predictiveperformanceandstabilityofsixspeciesdistributionmodels |