Cargando…

Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines

BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kliner, Merav, Poole, Kristina, Sinclair, David, Garner, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25367677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129
_version_ 1782343689292480512
author Kliner, Merav
Poole, Kristina
Sinclair, David
Garner, Paul
author_facet Kliner, Merav
Poole, Kristina
Sinclair, David
Garner, Paul
author_sort Kliner, Merav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict. METHODS: We systematically identified national or international English-language guidelines on malaria prevention in travellers to July 2013 using standard and multiple searching methods. We critically appraised guidelines using the AGREE II tool, and report inconsistent recommendations within guidelines. RESULTS: We identified five sets of English-language guidelines on preventing malaria for travellers. Assessment against AGREE II indicate that all of the guidelines fall short of internationally accepted standards in guideline development: none include a transparent description of methods; only one describes sources of funding or potential conflicts of interest; and only one includes formal presentation of the evidence alongside transparent assessment of the quality of that evidence. There were a number of important discrepancies between guidelines, and some omit information about effectiveness, safety and adverse effects of chemoprophylaxis options. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used for developing guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers lags behind current internationally recognized standards. Healthcare professionals as well as travellers themselves could be better informed if guidelines were more systematic and transparent summaries of the current knowledge on drug interventions in relation to effects, safety, administration and contra-indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4226897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42268972014-11-12 Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines Kliner, Merav Poole, Kristina Sinclair, David Garner, Paul BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict. METHODS: We systematically identified national or international English-language guidelines on malaria prevention in travellers to July 2013 using standard and multiple searching methods. We critically appraised guidelines using the AGREE II tool, and report inconsistent recommendations within guidelines. RESULTS: We identified five sets of English-language guidelines on preventing malaria for travellers. Assessment against AGREE II indicate that all of the guidelines fall short of internationally accepted standards in guideline development: none include a transparent description of methods; only one describes sources of funding or potential conflicts of interest; and only one includes formal presentation of the evidence alongside transparent assessment of the quality of that evidence. There were a number of important discrepancies between guidelines, and some omit information about effectiveness, safety and adverse effects of chemoprophylaxis options. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used for developing guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers lags behind current internationally recognized standards. Healthcare professionals as well as travellers themselves could be better informed if guidelines were more systematic and transparent summaries of the current knowledge on drug interventions in relation to effects, safety, administration and contra-indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4226897/ /pubmed/25367677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129 Text en © Kliner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kliner, Merav
Poole, Kristina
Sinclair, David
Garner, Paul
Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title_full Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title_fullStr Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title_short Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
title_sort preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published english-language guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25367677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129
work_keys_str_mv AT klinermerav preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines
AT poolekristina preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines
AT sinclairdavid preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines
AT garnerpaul preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines