Cargando…
Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines
BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidel...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25367677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129 |
_version_ | 1782343689292480512 |
---|---|
author | Kliner, Merav Poole, Kristina Sinclair, David Garner, Paul |
author_facet | Kliner, Merav Poole, Kristina Sinclair, David Garner, Paul |
author_sort | Kliner, Merav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict. METHODS: We systematically identified national or international English-language guidelines on malaria prevention in travellers to July 2013 using standard and multiple searching methods. We critically appraised guidelines using the AGREE II tool, and report inconsistent recommendations within guidelines. RESULTS: We identified five sets of English-language guidelines on preventing malaria for travellers. Assessment against AGREE II indicate that all of the guidelines fall short of internationally accepted standards in guideline development: none include a transparent description of methods; only one describes sources of funding or potential conflicts of interest; and only one includes formal presentation of the evidence alongside transparent assessment of the quality of that evidence. There were a number of important discrepancies between guidelines, and some omit information about effectiveness, safety and adverse effects of chemoprophylaxis options. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used for developing guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers lags behind current internationally recognized standards. Healthcare professionals as well as travellers themselves could be better informed if guidelines were more systematic and transparent summaries of the current knowledge on drug interventions in relation to effects, safety, administration and contra-indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4226897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42268972014-11-12 Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines Kliner, Merav Poole, Kristina Sinclair, David Garner, Paul BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict. METHODS: We systematically identified national or international English-language guidelines on malaria prevention in travellers to July 2013 using standard and multiple searching methods. We critically appraised guidelines using the AGREE II tool, and report inconsistent recommendations within guidelines. RESULTS: We identified five sets of English-language guidelines on preventing malaria for travellers. Assessment against AGREE II indicate that all of the guidelines fall short of internationally accepted standards in guideline development: none include a transparent description of methods; only one describes sources of funding or potential conflicts of interest; and only one includes formal presentation of the evidence alongside transparent assessment of the quality of that evidence. There were a number of important discrepancies between guidelines, and some omit information about effectiveness, safety and adverse effects of chemoprophylaxis options. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used for developing guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers lags behind current internationally recognized standards. Healthcare professionals as well as travellers themselves could be better informed if guidelines were more systematic and transparent summaries of the current knowledge on drug interventions in relation to effects, safety, administration and contra-indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4226897/ /pubmed/25367677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129 Text en © Kliner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kliner, Merav Poole, Kristina Sinclair, David Garner, Paul Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title | Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title_full | Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title_fullStr | Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title_short | Preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published English-language guidelines |
title_sort | preventing malaria in international travellers: an evaluation of published english-language guidelines |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4226897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25367677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klinermerav preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines AT poolekristina preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines AT sinclairdavid preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines AT garnerpaul preventingmalariaininternationaltravellersanevaluationofpublishedenglishlanguageguidelines |