Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinrich, Sebastian, Schmidt, Joachim, Ackermann, Andreas, Moritz, Andreas, Harig, Frank, Castellanos, Ixchel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988
_version_ 1782343713736884224
author Heinrich, Sebastian
Schmidt, Joachim
Ackermann, Andreas
Moritz, Andreas
Harig, Frank
Castellanos, Ixchel
author_facet Heinrich, Sebastian
Schmidt, Joachim
Ackermann, Andreas
Moritz, Andreas
Harig, Frank
Castellanos, Ixchel
author_sort Heinrich, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or an alternative induction regime ahead of major cardiac surgery and clinical outcome parameters associated with adrenal suppression and onset of sepsis. METHODS: The anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) records from patients undergoing cardiac surgery over five consecutive years (2008 to 2012) were retrospectively analyzed. The focus of the analysis was on clinical parameters like mortality, ventilation hours, renal failure, and sepsis-linked serum parameters. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were applied to derive the results. RESULTS: In total, 3,054 patient records were analyzed. A group of 1,775 (58%) patients received a single dose of etomidate; 1,279 (42%) patients did not receive etomidate at any time. There was no difference in distribution of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score, duration of surgery, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Postoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups in regard to mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), mean of mechanical ventilation hours (21.2 versus 19.7), days in the ICU (2.6 versus 2.5), hospital days (18.7 versus 17.4), sepsis-associated parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and incidence of renal failure. Administration of etomidate showed no significant influence (P = 0.6) on hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence for differences in key clinical outcome parameters based on anesthesia induction with or without administration of a single dose of etomidate. In consequence, etomidate might remain an acceptable option for single-dose anesthesia induction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4227004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42270042014-11-12 Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis Heinrich, Sebastian Schmidt, Joachim Ackermann, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Harig, Frank Castellanos, Ixchel Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or an alternative induction regime ahead of major cardiac surgery and clinical outcome parameters associated with adrenal suppression and onset of sepsis. METHODS: The anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) records from patients undergoing cardiac surgery over five consecutive years (2008 to 2012) were retrospectively analyzed. The focus of the analysis was on clinical parameters like mortality, ventilation hours, renal failure, and sepsis-linked serum parameters. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were applied to derive the results. RESULTS: In total, 3,054 patient records were analyzed. A group of 1,775 (58%) patients received a single dose of etomidate; 1,279 (42%) patients did not receive etomidate at any time. There was no difference in distribution of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score, duration of surgery, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Postoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups in regard to mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), mean of mechanical ventilation hours (21.2 versus 19.7), days in the ICU (2.6 versus 2.5), hospital days (18.7 versus 17.4), sepsis-associated parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and incidence of renal failure. Administration of etomidate showed no significant influence (P = 0.6) on hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence for differences in key clinical outcome parameters based on anesthesia induction with or without administration of a single dose of etomidate. In consequence, etomidate might remain an acceptable option for single-dose anesthesia induction. BioMed Central 2014 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4227004/ /pubmed/25015112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988 Text en Copyright © 2014 Heinrich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Heinrich, Sebastian
Schmidt, Joachim
Ackermann, Andreas
Moritz, Andreas
Harig, Frank
Castellanos, Ixchel
Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_full Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_short Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_sort comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichsebastian comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT schmidtjoachim comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ackermannandreas comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT moritzandreas comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT harigfrank comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT castellanosixchel comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis