Cargando…
Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis
INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988 |
_version_ | 1782343713736884224 |
---|---|
author | Heinrich, Sebastian Schmidt, Joachim Ackermann, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Harig, Frank Castellanos, Ixchel |
author_facet | Heinrich, Sebastian Schmidt, Joachim Ackermann, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Harig, Frank Castellanos, Ixchel |
author_sort | Heinrich, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or an alternative induction regime ahead of major cardiac surgery and clinical outcome parameters associated with adrenal suppression and onset of sepsis. METHODS: The anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) records from patients undergoing cardiac surgery over five consecutive years (2008 to 2012) were retrospectively analyzed. The focus of the analysis was on clinical parameters like mortality, ventilation hours, renal failure, and sepsis-linked serum parameters. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were applied to derive the results. RESULTS: In total, 3,054 patient records were analyzed. A group of 1,775 (58%) patients received a single dose of etomidate; 1,279 (42%) patients did not receive etomidate at any time. There was no difference in distribution of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score, duration of surgery, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Postoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups in regard to mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), mean of mechanical ventilation hours (21.2 versus 19.7), days in the ICU (2.6 versus 2.5), hospital days (18.7 versus 17.4), sepsis-associated parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and incidence of renal failure. Administration of etomidate showed no significant influence (P = 0.6) on hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence for differences in key clinical outcome parameters based on anesthesia induction with or without administration of a single dose of etomidate. In consequence, etomidate might remain an acceptable option for single-dose anesthesia induction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4227004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42270042014-11-12 Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis Heinrich, Sebastian Schmidt, Joachim Ackermann, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Harig, Frank Castellanos, Ixchel Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or an alternative induction regime ahead of major cardiac surgery and clinical outcome parameters associated with adrenal suppression and onset of sepsis. METHODS: The anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) records from patients undergoing cardiac surgery over five consecutive years (2008 to 2012) were retrospectively analyzed. The focus of the analysis was on clinical parameters like mortality, ventilation hours, renal failure, and sepsis-linked serum parameters. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were applied to derive the results. RESULTS: In total, 3,054 patient records were analyzed. A group of 1,775 (58%) patients received a single dose of etomidate; 1,279 (42%) patients did not receive etomidate at any time. There was no difference in distribution of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score, duration of surgery, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Postoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups in regard to mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), mean of mechanical ventilation hours (21.2 versus 19.7), days in the ICU (2.6 versus 2.5), hospital days (18.7 versus 17.4), sepsis-associated parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and incidence of renal failure. Administration of etomidate showed no significant influence (P = 0.6) on hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence for differences in key clinical outcome parameters based on anesthesia induction with or without administration of a single dose of etomidate. In consequence, etomidate might remain an acceptable option for single-dose anesthesia induction. BioMed Central 2014 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4227004/ /pubmed/25015112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988 Text en Copyright © 2014 Heinrich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Heinrich, Sebastian Schmidt, Joachim Ackermann, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Harig, Frank Castellanos, Ixchel Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title | Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinrichsebastian comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis AT schmidtjoachim comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis AT ackermannandreas comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis AT moritzandreas comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis AT harigfrank comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis AT castellanosixchel comparisonofclinicaloutcomevariablesinpatientswithandwithoutetomidatefacilitatedanesthesiainductionaheadofmajorcardiacsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis |