Cargando…

The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock

Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellen, Esther D., Rodenburg, T. Bas, Albers, Gerard A. A., Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth, Camerlink, Irene, Duijvesteijn, Naomi, Knol, Egbert F., Muir, William M., Peeters, Katrijn, Reimert, Inonge, Sell-Kubiak, Ewa, van Arendonk, Johan A. M., Visscher, Jeroen, Bijma, Piter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377
_version_ 1782343823271133184
author Ellen, Esther D.
Rodenburg, T. Bas
Albers, Gerard A. A.
Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth
Camerlink, Irene
Duijvesteijn, Naomi
Knol, Egbert F.
Muir, William M.
Peeters, Katrijn
Reimert, Inonge
Sell-Kubiak, Ewa
van Arendonk, Johan A. M.
Visscher, Jeroen
Bijma, Piter
author_facet Ellen, Esther D.
Rodenburg, T. Bas
Albers, Gerard A. A.
Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth
Camerlink, Irene
Duijvesteijn, Naomi
Knol, Egbert F.
Muir, William M.
Peeters, Katrijn
Reimert, Inonge
Sell-Kubiak, Ewa
van Arendonk, Johan A. M.
Visscher, Jeroen
Bijma, Piter
author_sort Ellen, Esther D.
collection PubMed
description Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4227523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42275232014-11-25 The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock Ellen, Esther D. Rodenburg, T. Bas Albers, Gerard A. A. Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth Camerlink, Irene Duijvesteijn, Naomi Knol, Egbert F. Muir, William M. Peeters, Katrijn Reimert, Inonge Sell-Kubiak, Ewa van Arendonk, Johan A. M. Visscher, Jeroen Bijma, Piter Front Genet Genetics Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4227523/ /pubmed/25426136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ellen, Rodenburg, Albers, Bolhuis, Camerlink, Duijvesteijn, Knol, Muir, Peeters, Reimert, Sell-Kubiak, van Arendonk, Visscher and Bijma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Ellen, Esther D.
Rodenburg, T. Bas
Albers, Gerard A. A.
Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth
Camerlink, Irene
Duijvesteijn, Naomi
Knol, Egbert F.
Muir, William M.
Peeters, Katrijn
Reimert, Inonge
Sell-Kubiak, Ewa
van Arendonk, Johan A. M.
Visscher, Jeroen
Bijma, Piter
The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title_full The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title_fullStr The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title_full_unstemmed The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title_short The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
title_sort prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenestherd theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT rodenburgtbas theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT albersgerardaa theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT bolhuisjelizabeth theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT camerlinkirene theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT duijvesteijnnaomi theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT knolegbertf theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT muirwilliamm theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT peeterskatrijn theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT reimertinonge theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT sellkubiakewa theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT vanarendonkjohanam theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT visscherjeroen theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT bijmapiter theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT ellenestherd prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT rodenburgtbas prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT albersgerardaa prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT bolhuisjelizabeth prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT camerlinkirene prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT duijvesteijnnaomi prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT knolegbertf prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT muirwilliamm prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT peeterskatrijn prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT reimertinonge prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT sellkubiakewa prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT vanarendonkjohanam prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT visscherjeroen prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock
AT bijmapiter prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock