Cargando…
The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock
Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377 |
_version_ | 1782343823271133184 |
---|---|
author | Ellen, Esther D. Rodenburg, T. Bas Albers, Gerard A. A. Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth Camerlink, Irene Duijvesteijn, Naomi Knol, Egbert F. Muir, William M. Peeters, Katrijn Reimert, Inonge Sell-Kubiak, Ewa van Arendonk, Johan A. M. Visscher, Jeroen Bijma, Piter |
author_facet | Ellen, Esther D. Rodenburg, T. Bas Albers, Gerard A. A. Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth Camerlink, Irene Duijvesteijn, Naomi Knol, Egbert F. Muir, William M. Peeters, Katrijn Reimert, Inonge Sell-Kubiak, Ewa van Arendonk, Johan A. M. Visscher, Jeroen Bijma, Piter |
author_sort | Ellen, Esther D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4227523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42275232014-11-25 The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock Ellen, Esther D. Rodenburg, T. Bas Albers, Gerard A. A. Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth Camerlink, Irene Duijvesteijn, Naomi Knol, Egbert F. Muir, William M. Peeters, Katrijn Reimert, Inonge Sell-Kubiak, Ewa van Arendonk, Johan A. M. Visscher, Jeroen Bijma, Piter Front Genet Genetics Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4227523/ /pubmed/25426136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ellen, Rodenburg, Albers, Bolhuis, Camerlink, Duijvesteijn, Knol, Muir, Peeters, Reimert, Sell-Kubiak, van Arendonk, Visscher and Bijma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Ellen, Esther D. Rodenburg, T. Bas Albers, Gerard A. A. Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth Camerlink, Irene Duijvesteijn, Naomi Knol, Egbert F. Muir, William M. Peeters, Katrijn Reimert, Inonge Sell-Kubiak, Ewa van Arendonk, Johan A. M. Visscher, Jeroen Bijma, Piter The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title | The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title_full | The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title_fullStr | The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title_full_unstemmed | The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title_short | The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
title_sort | prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenestherd theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT rodenburgtbas theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT albersgerardaa theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT bolhuisjelizabeth theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT camerlinkirene theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT duijvesteijnnaomi theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT knolegbertf theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT muirwilliamm theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT peeterskatrijn theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT reimertinonge theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT sellkubiakewa theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT vanarendonkjohanam theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT visscherjeroen theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT bijmapiter theprospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT ellenestherd prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT rodenburgtbas prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT albersgerardaa prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT bolhuisjelizabeth prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT camerlinkirene prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT duijvesteijnnaomi prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT knolegbertf prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT muirwilliamm prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT peeterskatrijn prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT reimertinonge prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT sellkubiakewa prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT vanarendonkjohanam prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT visscherjeroen prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock AT bijmapiter prospectsofselectionforsocialgeneticeffectstoimprovewelfareandproductivityinlivestock |