Cargando…

Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?

Since 2006, arboviruses transmitted by Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) have caused significant disruption to ruminant production in northern Europe. The most serious incursions involved strains of bluetongue virus (BTV), which cause bluetongue (BT) disease. To control spread of B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Searle, Kate R., Barber, James, Stubbins, Francesca, Labuschagne, Karien, Carpenter, Simon, Butler, Adam, Denison, Eric, Sanders, Christopher, Mellor, Philip S., Wilson, Anthony, Nelson, Noel, Gubbins, Simon, Purse, Bethan V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111876
_version_ 1782343851672862720
author Searle, Kate R.
Barber, James
Stubbins, Francesca
Labuschagne, Karien
Carpenter, Simon
Butler, Adam
Denison, Eric
Sanders, Christopher
Mellor, Philip S.
Wilson, Anthony
Nelson, Noel
Gubbins, Simon
Purse, Bethan V.
author_facet Searle, Kate R.
Barber, James
Stubbins, Francesca
Labuschagne, Karien
Carpenter, Simon
Butler, Adam
Denison, Eric
Sanders, Christopher
Mellor, Philip S.
Wilson, Anthony
Nelson, Noel
Gubbins, Simon
Purse, Bethan V.
author_sort Searle, Kate R.
collection PubMed
description Since 2006, arboviruses transmitted by Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) have caused significant disruption to ruminant production in northern Europe. The most serious incursions involved strains of bluetongue virus (BTV), which cause bluetongue (BT) disease. To control spread of BTV, movement of susceptible livestock is restricted with economic and animal welfare impacts. The timing of BTV transmission in temperate regions is partly determined by the seasonal presence of adult Culicoides females. Legislative measures therefore allow for the relaxation of ruminant movement restrictions during winter, when nightly light-suction trap catches of Culicoides fall below a threshold (the ‘seasonally vector free period’: SVFP). We analysed five years of time-series surveillance data from light-suction trapping in the UK to investigate whether significant inter-specific and yearly variation in adult phenology exists, and whether the SVFP is predictable from environmental factors. Because female vector Culicoides are not easily morphologically separated, inter-specific comparisons in phenology were drawn from male populations. We demonstrate significant inter-specific differences in Culicoides adult phenology with the season of Culicoides scoticus approximately eight weeks shorter than Culicoides obsoletus. Species-specific differences in the length of the SVFP were related to host density and local variation in landscape habitat. When the Avaritia Culicoides females were modelled as a group (as utilised in the SFVP), we were unable to detect links between environmental drivers and phenological metrics. We conclude that the current treatment of Avaritia Culicoides as a single group inhibits understanding of environmentally-driven spatial variation in species phenology and hinders the development of models for predicting the SVFP from environmental factors. Culicoides surveillance methods should be adapted to focus on concentrated assessments of species-specific abundance during the start and end of seasonal activity in temperate regions to facilitate refinement of ruminant movement restrictions thereby reducing the impact of Culicoides-borne arboviruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4227682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42276822014-11-18 Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy? Searle, Kate R. Barber, James Stubbins, Francesca Labuschagne, Karien Carpenter, Simon Butler, Adam Denison, Eric Sanders, Christopher Mellor, Philip S. Wilson, Anthony Nelson, Noel Gubbins, Simon Purse, Bethan V. PLoS One Research Article Since 2006, arboviruses transmitted by Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) have caused significant disruption to ruminant production in northern Europe. The most serious incursions involved strains of bluetongue virus (BTV), which cause bluetongue (BT) disease. To control spread of BTV, movement of susceptible livestock is restricted with economic and animal welfare impacts. The timing of BTV transmission in temperate regions is partly determined by the seasonal presence of adult Culicoides females. Legislative measures therefore allow for the relaxation of ruminant movement restrictions during winter, when nightly light-suction trap catches of Culicoides fall below a threshold (the ‘seasonally vector free period’: SVFP). We analysed five years of time-series surveillance data from light-suction trapping in the UK to investigate whether significant inter-specific and yearly variation in adult phenology exists, and whether the SVFP is predictable from environmental factors. Because female vector Culicoides are not easily morphologically separated, inter-specific comparisons in phenology were drawn from male populations. We demonstrate significant inter-specific differences in Culicoides adult phenology with the season of Culicoides scoticus approximately eight weeks shorter than Culicoides obsoletus. Species-specific differences in the length of the SVFP were related to host density and local variation in landscape habitat. When the Avaritia Culicoides females were modelled as a group (as utilised in the SFVP), we were unable to detect links between environmental drivers and phenological metrics. We conclude that the current treatment of Avaritia Culicoides as a single group inhibits understanding of environmentally-driven spatial variation in species phenology and hinders the development of models for predicting the SVFP from environmental factors. Culicoides surveillance methods should be adapted to focus on concentrated assessments of species-specific abundance during the start and end of seasonal activity in temperate regions to facilitate refinement of ruminant movement restrictions thereby reducing the impact of Culicoides-borne arboviruses. Public Library of Science 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4227682/ /pubmed/25386940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111876 Text en © 2014 Searle et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Searle, Kate R.
Barber, James
Stubbins, Francesca
Labuschagne, Karien
Carpenter, Simon
Butler, Adam
Denison, Eric
Sanders, Christopher
Mellor, Philip S.
Wilson, Anthony
Nelson, Noel
Gubbins, Simon
Purse, Bethan V.
Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title_full Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title_fullStr Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title_short Environmental Drivers of Culicoides Phenology: How Important Is Species-Specific Variation When Determining Disease Policy?
title_sort environmental drivers of culicoides phenology: how important is species-specific variation when determining disease policy?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4227682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111876
work_keys_str_mv AT searlekater environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT barberjames environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT stubbinsfrancesca environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT labuschagnekarien environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT carpentersimon environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT butleradam environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT denisoneric environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT sanderschristopher environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT mellorphilips environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT wilsonanthony environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT nelsonnoel environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT gubbinssimon environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy
AT pursebethanv environmentaldriversofculicoidesphenologyhowimportantisspeciesspecificvariationwhendeterminingdiseasepolicy