Cargando…

Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study

BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is essentially a result of pelvic injury caused by prolonged obstructed labour. Foot drop and walking difficulties in some of these women signify that the injury may extend beyond the loss of tissue that led to the fistula. However, these aspects of the pelvic injury ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg, Muleta, Mulu, Kiserud, Torvid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25380616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-014-0136-3
_version_ 1782343907128901632
author Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg
Muleta, Mulu
Kiserud, Torvid
author_facet Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg
Muleta, Mulu
Kiserud, Torvid
author_sort Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is essentially a result of pelvic injury caused by prolonged obstructed labour. Foot drop and walking difficulties in some of these women signify that the injury may extend beyond the loss of tissue that led to the fistula. However, these aspects of the pelvic injury are scarcely addressed in the literature. Here we specifically aimed at assessing musculoskeletal function in women with obstetric fistula to appreciate the extent of the sequelae of their pelvic injury. METHODS: This case–control study compared 70 patients with obstetric fistula with 100 controls matched for age and years since delivery. The following was recorded: height, weight, past and present walking difficulties, pain, muscle strength and joint range of motion, circumference and reflexes. Differences between groups were analysed using independent sample t-test and chi-square test for independence. RESULTS: A history of leg pain was more common among cases compared to controls, 20% versus 7% (p = 0.02), and 29% of the cases had difficulties walking following the injuring delivery compared to none of the controls (p ≤ 0.001). Of these, four women reported spontaneous recovery. Cases had 7° less range of motion in ankle dorsal flexion (95%CI: −8.1, −4.8), 8° less ankle plantar flexion (95%CI: −10.6, −6.5), 12° less knee flexion (95%CI: −14.1, −8.9), and 4° less knee extension (95%CI: 2.9, 5.0) compared to controls. Twelve % of the cases had lower ankle dorsal flexion strength (p = 0.009). Foot drop was present in three (4.3%) compared with none among controls. Women with fistula had 4° greater movement in hip extension (95%CI: −5.9, −3.1), 2° greater hip lateral rotation (95%CI: 0.7, 3.3) and 9° greater hip abduction (95%CI: 6.4, 10.7). Twelve % of the cases had stronger medial rotation in the hip (p = 0.04), 20% had stronger hip lateral rotation (p ≤ 0.001), 29% had stronger hip extension (p ≤ 0.001), and 15% had stronger hip abduction (p = 0.04) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Women with obstetric fistula commonly experienced walking difficulties after the delivery, had often leg pain and reduced function in the ankle and knee joints that may have been compensated by increased motion and strength in the hip. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12905-014-0136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42280642014-11-12 Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg Muleta, Mulu Kiserud, Torvid BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is essentially a result of pelvic injury caused by prolonged obstructed labour. Foot drop and walking difficulties in some of these women signify that the injury may extend beyond the loss of tissue that led to the fistula. However, these aspects of the pelvic injury are scarcely addressed in the literature. Here we specifically aimed at assessing musculoskeletal function in women with obstetric fistula to appreciate the extent of the sequelae of their pelvic injury. METHODS: This case–control study compared 70 patients with obstetric fistula with 100 controls matched for age and years since delivery. The following was recorded: height, weight, past and present walking difficulties, pain, muscle strength and joint range of motion, circumference and reflexes. Differences between groups were analysed using independent sample t-test and chi-square test for independence. RESULTS: A history of leg pain was more common among cases compared to controls, 20% versus 7% (p = 0.02), and 29% of the cases had difficulties walking following the injuring delivery compared to none of the controls (p ≤ 0.001). Of these, four women reported spontaneous recovery. Cases had 7° less range of motion in ankle dorsal flexion (95%CI: −8.1, −4.8), 8° less ankle plantar flexion (95%CI: −10.6, −6.5), 12° less knee flexion (95%CI: −14.1, −8.9), and 4° less knee extension (95%CI: 2.9, 5.0) compared to controls. Twelve % of the cases had lower ankle dorsal flexion strength (p = 0.009). Foot drop was present in three (4.3%) compared with none among controls. Women with fistula had 4° greater movement in hip extension (95%CI: −5.9, −3.1), 2° greater hip lateral rotation (95%CI: 0.7, 3.3) and 9° greater hip abduction (95%CI: 6.4, 10.7). Twelve % of the cases had stronger medial rotation in the hip (p = 0.04), 20% had stronger hip lateral rotation (p ≤ 0.001), 29% had stronger hip extension (p ≤ 0.001), and 15% had stronger hip abduction (p = 0.04) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Women with obstetric fistula commonly experienced walking difficulties after the delivery, had often leg pain and reduced function in the ankle and knee joints that may have been compensated by increased motion and strength in the hip. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12905-014-0136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4228064/ /pubmed/25380616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-014-0136-3 Text en © Tennfjord et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg
Muleta, Mulu
Kiserud, Torvid
Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title_full Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title_short Musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
title_sort musculoskeletal sequelae in patients with obstetric fistula – a case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25380616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-014-0136-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tennfjordmeretekolberg musculoskeletalsequelaeinpatientswithobstetricfistulaacasecontrolstudy
AT muletamulu musculoskeletalsequelaeinpatientswithobstetricfistulaacasecontrolstudy
AT kiserudtorvid musculoskeletalsequelaeinpatientswithobstetricfistulaacasecontrolstudy