Cargando…
The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary
BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), while traditionally considered a “rich world”-problem, have been spreading fast in low and middle income countries and by now account for a large share of mortality and ill-health in these countries, too. In addition to the disease burden, NCDs may also...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0107-1 |
_version_ | 1782343916147703808 |
---|---|
author | Goryakin, Yevgeniy Suhrcke, Marc |
author_facet | Goryakin, Yevgeniy Suhrcke, Marc |
author_sort | Goryakin, Yevgeniy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), while traditionally considered a “rich world”-problem, have been spreading fast in low and middle income countries and by now account for a large share of mortality and ill-health in these countries, too. In addition to the disease burden, NCDs may also impose a substantial economic cost. One way in which NCDs might impact people’s economic well-being may be via the out-of-pocket expenditures required to cover treatment and other costs associated with suffering from an NCD. METHODS: In this commentary, we identify and discuss the methodological challenges related to cross-country comparison of-out-of-pocket and catastrophic out-of-pocket health care expenditures, attributable to NCDs, focussing on low and middle income countries. RESULTS: There is significant evidence of substantial cost burden placed by NCDs on patients living in low and middle income countries, with most of it being heavily concentrated among low socioeconomic status groups. However, a large variation in definition of COOPE between studies prevents cross-country comparison. In addition, as most studies tend to be observational, causal inferences are often not possible. This is further complicated by the cross-sectional nature of studies, small sample sizes, and/or limited duration of follow-up of patients. Most evidence for certain conditions (e.g., cancer) tends to be collected in high-income countries only. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions for COOPEs should be standardized as much as possible, to enable comparison of COOPE prevalence between countries. Prospective study design using larger samples representative of broader sections of local population, collecting better data on both direct and indirect treatment costs is also needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-014-0107-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4228103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42281032014-11-12 The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary Goryakin, Yevgeniy Suhrcke, Marc Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), while traditionally considered a “rich world”-problem, have been spreading fast in low and middle income countries and by now account for a large share of mortality and ill-health in these countries, too. In addition to the disease burden, NCDs may also impose a substantial economic cost. One way in which NCDs might impact people’s economic well-being may be via the out-of-pocket expenditures required to cover treatment and other costs associated with suffering from an NCD. METHODS: In this commentary, we identify and discuss the methodological challenges related to cross-country comparison of-out-of-pocket and catastrophic out-of-pocket health care expenditures, attributable to NCDs, focussing on low and middle income countries. RESULTS: There is significant evidence of substantial cost burden placed by NCDs on patients living in low and middle income countries, with most of it being heavily concentrated among low socioeconomic status groups. However, a large variation in definition of COOPE between studies prevents cross-country comparison. In addition, as most studies tend to be observational, causal inferences are often not possible. This is further complicated by the cross-sectional nature of studies, small sample sizes, and/or limited duration of follow-up of patients. Most evidence for certain conditions (e.g., cancer) tends to be collected in high-income countries only. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions for COOPEs should be standardized as much as possible, to enable comparison of COOPE prevalence between countries. Prospective study design using larger samples representative of broader sections of local population, collecting better data on both direct and indirect treatment costs is also needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-014-0107-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4228103/ /pubmed/25376485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0107-1 Text en © Goryakin and Suhrcke; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Goryakin, Yevgeniy Suhrcke, Marc The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title | The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title_full | The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title_fullStr | The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title_short | The prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
title_sort | prevalence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditures attributable to non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a methodological commentary |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0107-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goryakinyevgeniy theprevalenceanddeterminantsofcatastrophichealthexpendituresattributabletononcommunicablediseasesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamethodologicalcommentary AT suhrckemarc theprevalenceanddeterminantsofcatastrophichealthexpendituresattributabletononcommunicablediseasesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamethodologicalcommentary AT goryakinyevgeniy prevalenceanddeterminantsofcatastrophichealthexpendituresattributabletononcommunicablediseasesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamethodologicalcommentary AT suhrckemarc prevalenceanddeterminantsofcatastrophichealthexpendituresattributabletononcommunicablediseasesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamethodologicalcommentary |