Cargando…

Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses

BACKGROUND: The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confounder of these sequence-based approaches is the presence of contaminati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salter, Susannah J, Cox, Michael J, Turek, Elena M, Calus, Szymon T, Cookson, William O, Moffatt, Miriam F, Turner, Paul, Parkhill, Julian, Loman, Nicholas J, Walker, Alan W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z
_version_ 1782343921893900288
author Salter, Susannah J
Cox, Michael J
Turek, Elena M
Calus, Szymon T
Cookson, William O
Moffatt, Miriam F
Turner, Paul
Parkhill, Julian
Loman, Nicholas J
Walker, Alan W
author_facet Salter, Susannah J
Cox, Michael J
Turek, Elena M
Calus, Szymon T
Cookson, William O
Moffatt, Miriam F
Turner, Paul
Parkhill, Julian
Loman, Nicholas J
Walker, Alan W
author_sort Salter, Susannah J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confounder of these sequence-based approaches is the presence of contamination in DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents. RESULTS: In this study we demonstrate that contaminating DNA is ubiquitous in commonly used DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents, varies greatly in composition between different kits and kit batches, and that this contamination critically impacts results obtained from samples containing a low microbial biomass. Contamination impacts both PCR-based 16S rRNA gene surveys and shotgun metagenomics. We provide an extensive list of potential contaminating genera, and guidelines on how to mitigate the effects of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that caution should be advised when applying sequence-based techniques to the study of microbiota present in low biomass environments. Concurrent sequencing of negative control samples is strongly advised. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42281532014-11-13 Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses Salter, Susannah J Cox, Michael J Turek, Elena M Calus, Szymon T Cookson, William O Moffatt, Miriam F Turner, Paul Parkhill, Julian Loman, Nicholas J Walker, Alan W BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confounder of these sequence-based approaches is the presence of contamination in DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents. RESULTS: In this study we demonstrate that contaminating DNA is ubiquitous in commonly used DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents, varies greatly in composition between different kits and kit batches, and that this contamination critically impacts results obtained from samples containing a low microbial biomass. Contamination impacts both PCR-based 16S rRNA gene surveys and shotgun metagenomics. We provide an extensive list of potential contaminating genera, and guidelines on how to mitigate the effects of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that caution should be advised when applying sequence-based techniques to the study of microbiota present in low biomass environments. Concurrent sequencing of negative control samples is strongly advised. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4228153/ /pubmed/25387460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z Text en © Salter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salter, Susannah J
Cox, Michael J
Turek, Elena M
Calus, Szymon T
Cookson, William O
Moffatt, Miriam F
Turner, Paul
Parkhill, Julian
Loman, Nicholas J
Walker, Alan W
Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title_full Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title_fullStr Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title_full_unstemmed Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title_short Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
title_sort reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z
work_keys_str_mv AT saltersusannahj reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT coxmichaelj reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT turekelenam reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT calusszymont reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT cooksonwilliamo reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT moffattmiriamf reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT turnerpaul reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT parkhilljulian reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT lomannicholasj reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses
AT walkeralanw reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses