Cargando…

Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important factor endangering the long-term safety and efficacy of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). It is plausible that soft vulnerable plaques are more likely to be injured during CAS procedure and are therefore more likely to initiate the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasser, Katrin, Karch, André, Gröschel, Sonja, Witzenhausen, Janin, Gröschel, Klaus, Bähr, Mathias, Liman, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24191865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-163
_version_ 1782343939698720768
author Wasser, Katrin
Karch, André
Gröschel, Sonja
Witzenhausen, Janin
Gröschel, Klaus
Bähr, Mathias
Liman, Jan
author_facet Wasser, Katrin
Karch, André
Gröschel, Sonja
Witzenhausen, Janin
Gröschel, Klaus
Bähr, Mathias
Liman, Jan
author_sort Wasser, Katrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important factor endangering the long-term safety and efficacy of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). It is plausible that soft vulnerable plaques are more likely to be injured during CAS procedure and are therefore more likely to initiate the cascade finally leading to ISR. The aim of this study was to investigate if plaque morphology detected by a simple applicable Duplex ultrasound score before CAS can be used as a predictor for ISR. METHODS: Within a prospectively collected single-centre CAS database of 281 patients (comprising 300 arteries) with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who underwent CAS between May 2003 and January 2013, we conducted a nested case–control study. Plaque morphology before CAS was analysed by a blinded investigator and each parameter of the Total Plaque Risk Score (TPRS) as well as the whole score was evaluated with regard to its diagnostic validity for ISR. RESULTS: We analysed the data of 10 patients with ISR and 50 patients without ISR. There were no significant differences with respect to baseline characteristics, vascular risk factors, and degree of stenosis between patients with and without ISR. The duration of follow-up was longer in patients with ISR (p = 0.024) and these patients were more likely to show increased PSV (p = 0.012) immediately after CAS than patients without ISR. Neither individual parameters of the TPRS score nor the score as a whole were suitable as a diagnostic test for ISR development. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study we could demonstrate that the non-contrast enhanced DUS of the pre-interventional plaque formation cannot be used as a predictor for the development of ISR. Evaluating a more sophisticated, but not routinely available approach e.g. by ultrasound based plaque perfusion imaging or CT based plaque analysis could be helpful in the future in order to assess the role of plaque morphology in the context of ISR development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42282342014-11-13 Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study Wasser, Katrin Karch, André Gröschel, Sonja Witzenhausen, Janin Gröschel, Klaus Bähr, Mathias Liman, Jan BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important factor endangering the long-term safety and efficacy of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). It is plausible that soft vulnerable plaques are more likely to be injured during CAS procedure and are therefore more likely to initiate the cascade finally leading to ISR. The aim of this study was to investigate if plaque morphology detected by a simple applicable Duplex ultrasound score before CAS can be used as a predictor for ISR. METHODS: Within a prospectively collected single-centre CAS database of 281 patients (comprising 300 arteries) with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who underwent CAS between May 2003 and January 2013, we conducted a nested case–control study. Plaque morphology before CAS was analysed by a blinded investigator and each parameter of the Total Plaque Risk Score (TPRS) as well as the whole score was evaluated with regard to its diagnostic validity for ISR. RESULTS: We analysed the data of 10 patients with ISR and 50 patients without ISR. There were no significant differences with respect to baseline characteristics, vascular risk factors, and degree of stenosis between patients with and without ISR. The duration of follow-up was longer in patients with ISR (p = 0.024) and these patients were more likely to show increased PSV (p = 0.012) immediately after CAS than patients without ISR. Neither individual parameters of the TPRS score nor the score as a whole were suitable as a diagnostic test for ISR development. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study we could demonstrate that the non-contrast enhanced DUS of the pre-interventional plaque formation cannot be used as a predictor for the development of ISR. Evaluating a more sophisticated, but not routinely available approach e.g. by ultrasound based plaque perfusion imaging or CT based plaque analysis could be helpful in the future in order to assess the role of plaque morphology in the context of ISR development. BioMed Central 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4228234/ /pubmed/24191865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-163 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wasser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wasser, Katrin
Karch, André
Gröschel, Sonja
Witzenhausen, Janin
Gröschel, Klaus
Bähr, Mathias
Liman, Jan
Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title_full Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title_fullStr Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title_short Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
title_sort plaque morphology detected with duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (cas) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24191865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-163
work_keys_str_mv AT wasserkatrin plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT karchandre plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT groschelsonja plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT witzenhausenjanin plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT groschelklaus plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT bahrmathias plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy
AT limanjan plaquemorphologydetectedwithduplexultrasoundbeforecarotidangioplastyandstentingcasisnotapredictorofcarotidarteryinstentrestenosisacasecontrolstudy