Cargando…
Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200 |
_version_ | 1782343951132393472 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Jennifer Barrett, Geraldine Mbwana, Nicholas Copas, Andrew Malata, Address Stephenson, Judith |
author_facet | Hall, Jennifer Barrett, Geraldine Mbwana, Nicholas Copas, Andrew Malata, Address Stephenson, Judith |
author_sort | Hall, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and neonatal deaths are high, is necessary to inform policies to address the unmet need for family planning. To this end this research aimed to validate the LMUP for use in the Chichewa language in Malawi. METHODS: Three Chichewa speakers translated the LMUP and one translation was agreed which was back-translated and pre-tested on five pregnant women using cognitive interviews. The measure was field tested with pregnant women who were recruited at antenatal clinics and data were analysed using classical test theory and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 125 women aged 15–43 (median 23), with parities of 1–8 (median 2) completed the Chichewa LMUP. There were no missing data. The full range of LMUP scores was captured. In terms of reliability, the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and test-retest data from 70 women showed good stability (weighted Kappa 0.80). In terms of validity, hypothesis testing confirmed that unmarried women (p = 0.003), women who had four or more children alive (p = 0.0051) and women who were below 20 or over 29 (p = 0.0115) were all more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Principal component analysis showed that five of the six items loaded onto one factor, with a further item borderline. A sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of the removal of the weakest item of the scale showed slightly improved performance but as the LMUP was not significantly adversely affected by its inclusion we recommend retaining the six-item score. CONCLUSION: The Chichewa LMUP is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention in Malawi and can now be used in research and/or surveillance. This is the first validation of this tool in a low-income country, helping to demonstrate that the concept of pregnancy planning is applicable in such a setting. Use of the Chichewa LMUP can enhance our understanding of pregnancy intention in Malawi, giving insight into the family planning services that are required to better meet women’s needs and save lives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4228283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42282832014-11-13 Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi Hall, Jennifer Barrett, Geraldine Mbwana, Nicholas Copas, Andrew Malata, Address Stephenson, Judith BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and neonatal deaths are high, is necessary to inform policies to address the unmet need for family planning. To this end this research aimed to validate the LMUP for use in the Chichewa language in Malawi. METHODS: Three Chichewa speakers translated the LMUP and one translation was agreed which was back-translated and pre-tested on five pregnant women using cognitive interviews. The measure was field tested with pregnant women who were recruited at antenatal clinics and data were analysed using classical test theory and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 125 women aged 15–43 (median 23), with parities of 1–8 (median 2) completed the Chichewa LMUP. There were no missing data. The full range of LMUP scores was captured. In terms of reliability, the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and test-retest data from 70 women showed good stability (weighted Kappa 0.80). In terms of validity, hypothesis testing confirmed that unmarried women (p = 0.003), women who had four or more children alive (p = 0.0051) and women who were below 20 or over 29 (p = 0.0115) were all more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Principal component analysis showed that five of the six items loaded onto one factor, with a further item borderline. A sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of the removal of the weakest item of the scale showed slightly improved performance but as the LMUP was not significantly adversely affected by its inclusion we recommend retaining the six-item score. CONCLUSION: The Chichewa LMUP is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention in Malawi and can now be used in research and/or surveillance. This is the first validation of this tool in a low-income country, helping to demonstrate that the concept of pregnancy planning is applicable in such a setting. Use of the Chichewa LMUP can enhance our understanding of pregnancy intention in Malawi, giving insight into the family planning services that are required to better meet women’s needs and save lives. BioMed Central 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4228283/ /pubmed/24188251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hall, Jennifer Barrett, Geraldine Mbwana, Nicholas Copas, Andrew Malata, Address Stephenson, Judith Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title | Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title_full | Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title_fullStr | Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title_short | Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi |
title_sort | understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the london measure of unplanned pregnancy in malawi |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halljennifer understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi AT barrettgeraldine understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi AT mbwananicholas understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi AT copasandrew understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi AT malataaddress understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi AT stephensonjudith understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi |