Cargando…

Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi

BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Jennifer, Barrett, Geraldine, Mbwana, Nicholas, Copas, Andrew, Malata, Address, Stephenson, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200
_version_ 1782343951132393472
author Hall, Jennifer
Barrett, Geraldine
Mbwana, Nicholas
Copas, Andrew
Malata, Address
Stephenson, Judith
author_facet Hall, Jennifer
Barrett, Geraldine
Mbwana, Nicholas
Copas, Andrew
Malata, Address
Stephenson, Judith
author_sort Hall, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and neonatal deaths are high, is necessary to inform policies to address the unmet need for family planning. To this end this research aimed to validate the LMUP for use in the Chichewa language in Malawi. METHODS: Three Chichewa speakers translated the LMUP and one translation was agreed which was back-translated and pre-tested on five pregnant women using cognitive interviews. The measure was field tested with pregnant women who were recruited at antenatal clinics and data were analysed using classical test theory and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 125 women aged 15–43 (median 23), with parities of 1–8 (median 2) completed the Chichewa LMUP. There were no missing data. The full range of LMUP scores was captured. In terms of reliability, the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and test-retest data from 70 women showed good stability (weighted Kappa 0.80). In terms of validity, hypothesis testing confirmed that unmarried women (p = 0.003), women who had four or more children alive (p = 0.0051) and women who were below 20 or over 29 (p = 0.0115) were all more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Principal component analysis showed that five of the six items loaded onto one factor, with a further item borderline. A sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of the removal of the weakest item of the scale showed slightly improved performance but as the LMUP was not significantly adversely affected by its inclusion we recommend retaining the six-item score. CONCLUSION: The Chichewa LMUP is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention in Malawi and can now be used in research and/or surveillance. This is the first validation of this tool in a low-income country, helping to demonstrate that the concept of pregnancy planning is applicable in such a setting. Use of the Chichewa LMUP can enhance our understanding of pregnancy intention in Malawi, giving insight into the family planning services that are required to better meet women’s needs and save lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42282832014-11-13 Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi Hall, Jennifer Barrett, Geraldine Mbwana, Nicholas Copas, Andrew Malata, Address Stephenson, Judith BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and neonatal deaths are high, is necessary to inform policies to address the unmet need for family planning. To this end this research aimed to validate the LMUP for use in the Chichewa language in Malawi. METHODS: Three Chichewa speakers translated the LMUP and one translation was agreed which was back-translated and pre-tested on five pregnant women using cognitive interviews. The measure was field tested with pregnant women who were recruited at antenatal clinics and data were analysed using classical test theory and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 125 women aged 15–43 (median 23), with parities of 1–8 (median 2) completed the Chichewa LMUP. There were no missing data. The full range of LMUP scores was captured. In terms of reliability, the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and test-retest data from 70 women showed good stability (weighted Kappa 0.80). In terms of validity, hypothesis testing confirmed that unmarried women (p = 0.003), women who had four or more children alive (p = 0.0051) and women who were below 20 or over 29 (p = 0.0115) were all more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Principal component analysis showed that five of the six items loaded onto one factor, with a further item borderline. A sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of the removal of the weakest item of the scale showed slightly improved performance but as the LMUP was not significantly adversely affected by its inclusion we recommend retaining the six-item score. CONCLUSION: The Chichewa LMUP is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention in Malawi and can now be used in research and/or surveillance. This is the first validation of this tool in a low-income country, helping to demonstrate that the concept of pregnancy planning is applicable in such a setting. Use of the Chichewa LMUP can enhance our understanding of pregnancy intention in Malawi, giving insight into the family planning services that are required to better meet women’s needs and save lives. BioMed Central 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4228283/ /pubmed/24188251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hall, Jennifer
Barrett, Geraldine
Mbwana, Nicholas
Copas, Andrew
Malata, Address
Stephenson, Judith
Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title_full Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title_fullStr Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title_short Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
title_sort understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the london measure of unplanned pregnancy in malawi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200
work_keys_str_mv AT halljennifer understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi
AT barrettgeraldine understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi
AT mbwananicholas understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi
AT copasandrew understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi
AT malataaddress understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi
AT stephensonjudith understandingpregnancyplanninginalowincomecountrysettingvalidationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyinmalawi