Cargando…

Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha

BACKGROUND: Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hexapoda and Crustacea form a common clade (the Pancrustacea), which is now widely accepted among zoologists; however, the origin of Hexapoda remains unresolved. The main problems are the unclear relationships among the basal hexapod lin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasaki, Go, Ishiwata, Keisuke, Machida, Ryuichiro, Miyata, Takashi, Su, Zhi-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-236
_version_ 1782343975894515712
author Sasaki, Go
Ishiwata, Keisuke
Machida, Ryuichiro
Miyata, Takashi
Su, Zhi-Hui
author_facet Sasaki, Go
Ishiwata, Keisuke
Machida, Ryuichiro
Miyata, Takashi
Su, Zhi-Hui
author_sort Sasaki, Go
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hexapoda and Crustacea form a common clade (the Pancrustacea), which is now widely accepted among zoologists; however, the origin of Hexapoda remains unresolved. The main problems are the unclear relationships among the basal hexapod lineages, Protura (proturans), Collembola (springtails), Diplura (diplurans), and Ectognatha (bristletails, silverfishes, and all winged insects). Mitogenomic analyses have challenged hexapod monophyly and suggested the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea, whereas studies based on nuclear molecular data support the monophyletic origin of hexapods. Additionally, there are significant discrepancies with respect to these issues between the results of morphological and molecular studies. To investigate these problems, we performed phylogenetic analyses of Pancrustacea based on the protein sequences of three orthologous nuclear genes encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta and the largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase II from 64 species of arthropods, including representatives of all hexapod orders. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the inferred amino acid (aa) sequences (~3400 aa in total) of the three genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and Bayesian inference. Analyses were also performed with additional datasets generated by excluding long-branch taxa or by using different outgroups. These analyses all yielded essentially the same results. All hexapods were clustered into a common clade, with Branchiopoda as its sister lineage, whereas Crustacea was paraphyletic. Within Hexapoda, the lineages Ectognatha, Palaeoptera, Neoptera, Polyneoptera, and Holometabola were each confirmed to be monophyletic with robust support, but monophyly was not supported for Entognatha (Protura + Collembola + Diplura), Ellipura (Protura + Collembola), or Nonoculata (Protura + Diplura). Instead, our results showed that Protura is the sister lineage to all other hexapods and that Diplura or Diplura + Collembola is closely related to Ectognatha. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to include all hexapod orders in a phylogenetic analysis using multiple nuclear protein-coding genes to investigate the phylogeny of Hexapoda, with an emphasis on Entognatha. The results strongly support the monophyletic origin of hexapods but reject the monophyly of Entognatha, Ellipura, and Nonoculata. Our results provided the first molecular evidence in support of Protura as the sister group to other hexapods. These findings are expected to provide additional insights into the origin of hexapods and the processes involved in the adaptation of insects to life on land.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42284032014-11-13 Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha Sasaki, Go Ishiwata, Keisuke Machida, Ryuichiro Miyata, Takashi Su, Zhi-Hui BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hexapoda and Crustacea form a common clade (the Pancrustacea), which is now widely accepted among zoologists; however, the origin of Hexapoda remains unresolved. The main problems are the unclear relationships among the basal hexapod lineages, Protura (proturans), Collembola (springtails), Diplura (diplurans), and Ectognatha (bristletails, silverfishes, and all winged insects). Mitogenomic analyses have challenged hexapod monophyly and suggested the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea, whereas studies based on nuclear molecular data support the monophyletic origin of hexapods. Additionally, there are significant discrepancies with respect to these issues between the results of morphological and molecular studies. To investigate these problems, we performed phylogenetic analyses of Pancrustacea based on the protein sequences of three orthologous nuclear genes encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta and the largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase II from 64 species of arthropods, including representatives of all hexapod orders. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the inferred amino acid (aa) sequences (~3400 aa in total) of the three genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and Bayesian inference. Analyses were also performed with additional datasets generated by excluding long-branch taxa or by using different outgroups. These analyses all yielded essentially the same results. All hexapods were clustered into a common clade, with Branchiopoda as its sister lineage, whereas Crustacea was paraphyletic. Within Hexapoda, the lineages Ectognatha, Palaeoptera, Neoptera, Polyneoptera, and Holometabola were each confirmed to be monophyletic with robust support, but monophyly was not supported for Entognatha (Protura + Collembola + Diplura), Ellipura (Protura + Collembola), or Nonoculata (Protura + Diplura). Instead, our results showed that Protura is the sister lineage to all other hexapods and that Diplura or Diplura + Collembola is closely related to Ectognatha. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to include all hexapod orders in a phylogenetic analysis using multiple nuclear protein-coding genes to investigate the phylogeny of Hexapoda, with an emphasis on Entognatha. The results strongly support the monophyletic origin of hexapods but reject the monophyly of Entognatha, Ellipura, and Nonoculata. Our results provided the first molecular evidence in support of Protura as the sister group to other hexapods. These findings are expected to provide additional insights into the origin of hexapods and the processes involved in the adaptation of insects to life on land. BioMed Central 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4228403/ /pubmed/24176097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-236 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sasaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sasaki, Go
Ishiwata, Keisuke
Machida, Ryuichiro
Miyata, Takashi
Su, Zhi-Hui
Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title_full Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title_fullStr Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title_full_unstemmed Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title_short Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha
title_sort molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of entognatha
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-236
work_keys_str_mv AT sasakigo molecularphylogeneticanalysessupportthemonophylyofhexapodaandsuggesttheparaphylyofentognatha
AT ishiwatakeisuke molecularphylogeneticanalysessupportthemonophylyofhexapodaandsuggesttheparaphylyofentognatha
AT machidaryuichiro molecularphylogeneticanalysessupportthemonophylyofhexapodaandsuggesttheparaphylyofentognatha
AT miyatatakashi molecularphylogeneticanalysessupportthemonophylyofhexapodaandsuggesttheparaphylyofentognatha
AT suzhihui molecularphylogeneticanalysessupportthemonophylyofhexapodaandsuggesttheparaphylyofentognatha