Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation

AIM: Providing consistent levels of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) for infants in neonatal intensive care units is not easy. This study explored how effectively the Auto-Mixer® algorithm automatically adjusted fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) levels to maintain SpO(2) within an intended range in ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata, James, Gómez, John Jairo, Araque Campo, Robinson, Matiz Rubio, Alejandro, Sola, Augusto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24813808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12684
_version_ 1782344040872673280
author Zapata, James
Gómez, John Jairo
Araque Campo, Robinson
Matiz Rubio, Alejandro
Sola, Augusto
author_facet Zapata, James
Gómez, John Jairo
Araque Campo, Robinson
Matiz Rubio, Alejandro
Sola, Augusto
author_sort Zapata, James
collection PubMed
description AIM: Providing consistent levels of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) for infants in neonatal intensive care units is not easy. This study explored how effectively the Auto-Mixer® algorithm automatically adjusted fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) levels to maintain SpO(2) within an intended range in extremely low birth weight infants receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Twenty extremely low birth weight infants were randomly assigned to the Auto-Mixer® group or the manual intervention group and studied for 12 h. The SpO(2) target was 85–93%, and the outcomes were the percentage of time SpO(2) was within target, SpO(2) variability, SpO(2) >95%, oxygen received and manual interventions. RESULTS: The percentage of time within intended SpO(2) was 58 ± 4% in the Auto-Mixer® group and 33.7 ± 4.7% in the manual group, SpO(2) >95% was 26.5% vs 54.8%, average SpO(2) and FiO(2) were 89.8% vs 92.2% and 37% vs 44.1%, and manual interventions were 0 vs 80 (p < 0.05). Brief periods of SpO(2) < 85% occurred more frequently in the Auto-Mixer® group. CONCLUSION: The Auto-Mixer® effectively increased the percentage of time that SpO(2) was within the intended target range and decreased the time with high SpO(2) in spontaneously breathing extremely low birth weight infants receiving supplemental oxygen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42287572014-12-15 A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation Zapata, James Gómez, John Jairo Araque Campo, Robinson Matiz Rubio, Alejandro Sola, Augusto Acta Paediatr Regular Articles AIM: Providing consistent levels of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) for infants in neonatal intensive care units is not easy. This study explored how effectively the Auto-Mixer® algorithm automatically adjusted fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) levels to maintain SpO(2) within an intended range in extremely low birth weight infants receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Twenty extremely low birth weight infants were randomly assigned to the Auto-Mixer® group or the manual intervention group and studied for 12 h. The SpO(2) target was 85–93%, and the outcomes were the percentage of time SpO(2) was within target, SpO(2) variability, SpO(2) >95%, oxygen received and manual interventions. RESULTS: The percentage of time within intended SpO(2) was 58 ± 4% in the Auto-Mixer® group and 33.7 ± 4.7% in the manual group, SpO(2) >95% was 26.5% vs 54.8%, average SpO(2) and FiO(2) were 89.8% vs 92.2% and 37% vs 44.1%, and manual interventions were 0 vs 80 (p < 0.05). Brief periods of SpO(2) < 85% occurred more frequently in the Auto-Mixer® group. CONCLUSION: The Auto-Mixer® effectively increased the percentage of time that SpO(2) was within the intended target range and decreased the time with high SpO(2) in spontaneously breathing extremely low birth weight infants receiving supplemental oxygen. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-09 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4228757/ /pubmed/24813808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12684 Text en ©2014 The Authors. Acta Pædiatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Zapata, James
Gómez, John Jairo
Araque Campo, Robinson
Matiz Rubio, Alejandro
Sola, Augusto
A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title_full A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title_short A randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
title_sort randomised controlled trial of an automated oxygen delivery algorithm for preterm neonates receiving supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24813808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12684
work_keys_str_mv AT zapatajames arandomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT gomezjohnjairo arandomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT araquecamporobinson arandomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT matizrubioalejandro arandomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT solaaugusto arandomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT zapatajames randomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT gomezjohnjairo randomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT araquecamporobinson randomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT matizrubioalejandro randomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation
AT solaaugusto randomisedcontrolledtrialofanautomatedoxygendeliveryalgorithmforpretermneonatesreceivingsupplementaloxygenwithoutmechanicalventilation