Cargando…

Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?

OBJECTIVE: The Royal College of Physicians and National Institute of Clinical Excellence have recommended that magnetic resonance imaging should be the modality of choice for cerebral imaging in transient ischemic attack patients. However, implementation of this is often difficult. Therefore, it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganesalingam, Jeban, Jenkins, I Harri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414551656
_version_ 1782344062567710720
author Ganesalingam, Jeban
Jenkins, I Harri
author_facet Ganesalingam, Jeban
Jenkins, I Harri
author_sort Ganesalingam, Jeban
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Royal College of Physicians and National Institute of Clinical Excellence have recommended that magnetic resonance imaging should be the modality of choice for cerebral imaging in transient ischemic attack patients. However, implementation of this is often difficult. Therefore, it is important to know whether magnetic resonance imaging contributes significantly to early clinical management in transient ischemic attack patients. DESIGN: A retrospective case-notes review of 65 consecutive patients seen by one neurology trainee (with consultant review), in a neurovascular service where computed tomography has been the primary cerebral imaging modality. SETTING: Outpatient TIA/Neurovascular clinic at Imperial College hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 65 consecutive patients seen by one neurology trainee (with consultant review). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We recorded the preliminary clinical diagnosis, details of investigations performed and whether or not patients had a magnetic resonance imaging brain scan subsequently, the number followed up in clinic and the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 65 cases seen, 55% were classified initially as transient ischemic attack/stroke mimics. Of the 29 cases (45%) that were classified as transient ischemic attack, all had computed tomography scans, 12 had magnetic resonance imaging scans subsequently and 14 were followed up several weeks later. Of the 36 cases classified as stroke mimics, 27 had computed tomography scans immediately and 31 had carotid Dopplers, six subsequently had magnetic resonance imaging scans and 14 were followed up in clinic. Only two patients had their diagnosis revised on the basis of the magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that magnetic resonance imaging brain changes the diagnosis in a relatively small percentage of cases. A good history and examination remain paramount in the assessment of patients presenting to the transient ischemic attack clinic, particularly when more than 50% of cases referred are transient ischemic attack/stroke mimics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4228921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42289212014-11-18 Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic? Ganesalingam, Jeban Jenkins, I Harri JRSM Open Research Letter OBJECTIVE: The Royal College of Physicians and National Institute of Clinical Excellence have recommended that magnetic resonance imaging should be the modality of choice for cerebral imaging in transient ischemic attack patients. However, implementation of this is often difficult. Therefore, it is important to know whether magnetic resonance imaging contributes significantly to early clinical management in transient ischemic attack patients. DESIGN: A retrospective case-notes review of 65 consecutive patients seen by one neurology trainee (with consultant review), in a neurovascular service where computed tomography has been the primary cerebral imaging modality. SETTING: Outpatient TIA/Neurovascular clinic at Imperial College hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 65 consecutive patients seen by one neurology trainee (with consultant review). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We recorded the preliminary clinical diagnosis, details of investigations performed and whether or not patients had a magnetic resonance imaging brain scan subsequently, the number followed up in clinic and the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 65 cases seen, 55% were classified initially as transient ischemic attack/stroke mimics. Of the 29 cases (45%) that were classified as transient ischemic attack, all had computed tomography scans, 12 had magnetic resonance imaging scans subsequently and 14 were followed up several weeks later. Of the 36 cases classified as stroke mimics, 27 had computed tomography scans immediately and 31 had carotid Dopplers, six subsequently had magnetic resonance imaging scans and 14 were followed up in clinic. Only two patients had their diagnosis revised on the basis of the magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that magnetic resonance imaging brain changes the diagnosis in a relatively small percentage of cases. A good history and examination remain paramount in the assessment of patients presenting to the transient ischemic attack clinic, particularly when more than 50% of cases referred are transient ischemic attack/stroke mimics. SAGE Publications 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4228921/ /pubmed/25408918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414551656 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Ganesalingam, Jeban
Jenkins, I Harri
Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title_full Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title_fullStr Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title_full_unstemmed Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title_short Should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
title_sort should magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography be the primary brain imaging modality in the transient ischemic attack clinic?
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414551656
work_keys_str_mv AT ganesalingamjeban shouldmagneticresonanceimagingorcomputedtomographybetheprimarybrainimagingmodalityinthetransientischemicattackclinic
AT jenkinsiharri shouldmagneticresonanceimagingorcomputedtomographybetheprimarybrainimagingmodalityinthetransientischemicattackclinic