Cargando…
Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying
BACKGROUND: Several major outbreaks in healthcare facilities have occurred with the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. A possible route for dissemination is the hospital textiles and inadequate laundering of them. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-use method for simulating the laun...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25413829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/iee.v4.24314 |
_version_ | 1782344131512631296 |
---|---|
author | Tano, Eva Melhus, Åsa |
author_facet | Tano, Eva Melhus, Åsa |
author_sort | Tano, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several major outbreaks in healthcare facilities have occurred with the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. A possible route for dissemination is the hospital textiles and inadequate laundering of them. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-use method for simulating the laundering process of hospital textiles, and thereafter apply the method when evaluating the decontaminating efficacy of two different washing temperatures. METHODS: The laundering process, including tumble drying, took place at two professional laundries. Enterococcus faecium was used as bioindicator. RESULTS: The results showed that a lowering of the washing temperature from 70°C to 60°C did not affect the decontamination efficacy; the washing cycle alone reduced the number of bacteria with 3–5 log(10) CFU, whereas the following tumble drying reduced the bacterial numbers with another 3–4 log(10) CFU, yielding the same final result independent of washing temperature. Without tumble drying, there was an obvious risk of adding non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria to the fabric. These bacteria originated from the washing cycle. CONCLUSION: A simple method to simulate hospital laundering was developed. To save energy, it is possible to use a washing temperature of 60°C, but the washing cycle should be followed by tumble drying, and the whole laundering process needs to be monitored to maintain sufficient textile hygiene. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4229498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42294982014-12-02 Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying Tano, Eva Melhus, Åsa Infect Ecol Epidemiol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Several major outbreaks in healthcare facilities have occurred with the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. A possible route for dissemination is the hospital textiles and inadequate laundering of them. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-use method for simulating the laundering process of hospital textiles, and thereafter apply the method when evaluating the decontaminating efficacy of two different washing temperatures. METHODS: The laundering process, including tumble drying, took place at two professional laundries. Enterococcus faecium was used as bioindicator. RESULTS: The results showed that a lowering of the washing temperature from 70°C to 60°C did not affect the decontamination efficacy; the washing cycle alone reduced the number of bacteria with 3–5 log(10) CFU, whereas the following tumble drying reduced the bacterial numbers with another 3–4 log(10) CFU, yielding the same final result independent of washing temperature. Without tumble drying, there was an obvious risk of adding non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria to the fabric. These bacteria originated from the washing cycle. CONCLUSION: A simple method to simulate hospital laundering was developed. To save energy, it is possible to use a washing temperature of 60°C, but the washing cycle should be followed by tumble drying, and the whole laundering process needs to be monitored to maintain sufficient textile hygiene. Co-Action Publishing 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4229498/ /pubmed/25413829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/iee.v4.24314 Text en © 2014 Eva Tano and Åsa Melhus http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Tano, Eva Melhus, Åsa Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title | Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title_full | Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title_fullStr | Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title_full_unstemmed | Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title_short | Level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°C or 70°C followed by tumble drying |
title_sort | level of decontamination after washing textiles at 60°c or 70°c followed by tumble drying |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25413829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/iee.v4.24314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanoeva levelofdecontaminationafterwashingtextilesat60cor70cfollowedbytumbledrying AT melhusasa levelofdecontaminationafterwashingtextilesat60cor70cfollowedbytumbledrying |