Cargando…

Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010

BACKGROUND: The Services Sector, as defined by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA), is comprised of a diverse industry mix and its workers face a variety of occupational exposures and hazards. The objective of this study was to identify high-risk industry groups within the Services Sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Naomi J, Bonauto, David K, Adams, Darrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0037-2
_version_ 1782344136824717312
author Anderson, Naomi J
Bonauto, David K
Adams, Darrin
author_facet Anderson, Naomi J
Bonauto, David K
Adams, Darrin
author_sort Anderson, Naomi J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Services Sector, as defined by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA), is comprised of a diverse industry mix and its workers face a variety of occupational exposures and hazards. The objective of this study was to identify high-risk industry groups within the Services Sector for prevention targeting. METHODS: Compensable Washington State workers’ compensation claims from the Services Sector from 2002 through 2010 were analyzed. A “prevention index” (PI), the average of the rank orders of claim count and claim incidence rate, was used to rank 87 Services Sector industry groups by seven injury types: Work- Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs), Fall to Lower Level, Fall on Same Level, Struck By/Against, Caught In/Under/Between, Motor Vehicle, and Overexertion. In the PI rankings, industry groups with high injury burdens appear higher ranked than industry groups with low counts or low rates of injury, indicating a need for prioritizing injury prevention efforts in these groups. RESULTS: In the Services Sector, these 7 injury types account for 84% of compensable claims in WA. The industry groups highest ranked by PI across the injury types included: Services to Buildings and Dwellings; Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support; and Waste Collection. WMSDs had the highest compensable claims rates. CONCLUSIONS: Services is a large sector of the economy, and the substantial number, rate, and cost of occupational injuries within this sector should be addressed. Several Services Sector industry groups are at high risk for a variety of occupational injuries. Using a PI to rank industry groups based on their injury risk provides information with which to guide prevention efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4229604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42296042014-11-13 Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010 Anderson, Naomi J Bonauto, David K Adams, Darrin J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: The Services Sector, as defined by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA), is comprised of a diverse industry mix and its workers face a variety of occupational exposures and hazards. The objective of this study was to identify high-risk industry groups within the Services Sector for prevention targeting. METHODS: Compensable Washington State workers’ compensation claims from the Services Sector from 2002 through 2010 were analyzed. A “prevention index” (PI), the average of the rank orders of claim count and claim incidence rate, was used to rank 87 Services Sector industry groups by seven injury types: Work- Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs), Fall to Lower Level, Fall on Same Level, Struck By/Against, Caught In/Under/Between, Motor Vehicle, and Overexertion. In the PI rankings, industry groups with high injury burdens appear higher ranked than industry groups with low counts or low rates of injury, indicating a need for prioritizing injury prevention efforts in these groups. RESULTS: In the Services Sector, these 7 injury types account for 84% of compensable claims in WA. The industry groups highest ranked by PI across the injury types included: Services to Buildings and Dwellings; Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support; and Waste Collection. WMSDs had the highest compensable claims rates. CONCLUSIONS: Services is a large sector of the economy, and the substantial number, rate, and cost of occupational injuries within this sector should be addressed. Several Services Sector industry groups are at high risk for a variety of occupational injuries. Using a PI to rank industry groups based on their injury risk provides information with which to guide prevention efforts. BioMed Central 2014-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4229604/ /pubmed/25395986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0037-2 Text en © Anderson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Anderson, Naomi J
Bonauto, David K
Adams, Darrin
Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title_full Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title_fullStr Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title_short Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
title_sort prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the services sector in washington state, 2002–2010
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0037-2
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonnaomij prioritizingindustriesforoccupationalinjurypreventionandresearchintheservicessectorinwashingtonstate20022010
AT bonautodavidk prioritizingindustriesforoccupationalinjurypreventionandresearchintheservicessectorinwashingtonstate20022010
AT adamsdarrin prioritizingindustriesforoccupationalinjurypreventionandresearchintheservicessectorinwashingtonstate20022010