Cargando…
Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center
BACKGROUND: Optimal care of multiple trauma patients has to be at a high level around the clock. Trauma care algorithms and guidelines are available, yet it remains unclear if the time of admission to the trauma room affects the quality of care and outcomes. Hence the present study intends to compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25366718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0062-2 |
_version_ | 1782344138462593024 |
---|---|
author | Parsch, Wolfgang Loibl, Markus Schmucker, Uli Hilber, Franz Nerlich, Michael Ernstberger, Antonio |
author_facet | Parsch, Wolfgang Loibl, Markus Schmucker, Uli Hilber, Franz Nerlich, Michael Ernstberger, Antonio |
author_sort | Parsch, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Optimal care of multiple trauma patients has to be at a high level around the clock. Trauma care algorithms and guidelines are available, yet it remains unclear if the time of admission to the trauma room affects the quality of care and outcomes. Hence the present study intends to compare the quality of trauma room care of multiple severely injured patients at a level-1 trauma center depending on the time of admission. METHODS: A total of 394 multiple trauma patients with an ISS ≥ 16 were included into this study (observation period: 52 months). Patients were grouped by the time and date of their admission to the trauma room [business hours (BH): weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. vs. non-business hours (NBH): outside BH]. The study analysed differences in patient demographics, trauma room treatment and outcome. RESULTS: The study sample was comparable in all basic characteristics [mean ISS: 32.3 ± 14.3 (BH) vs. 32.6 ± 14.4 (NBH), p = 0.853; mean age: 40.8 ± 21.0 (BH) vs. 37.7 ± 20.2 years (NBH), p = 0.278]. Similar values were found for the time needed for single interventions, like arterial access [4.8 ± 3.9 min (BH) vs. 4.9 ± 3.4 min (NBH), p = 0.496] and quality-assessment parameters, like time until CT [28.5 ± 18.7 min (BH), vs. 27.3 ± 9.5) min (NBH), p = 0.637]. There was no difference for the 24 h mortality and overall hospital mortality in BH and NBH, with 13.5% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.206) and, 21.9% vs. 15.4% (p = 0.144), respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) comparison revealed no difference [3.7 ± 1.6 (BH) vs. 3.9 ± 1.5 (NBH), p = 0.305]. In general, the observed demographic, injury severity, care quality and outcome parameters revealed no significant difference between the two time periods BH and NBH. CONCLUSIONS: The study hospital provides multiple trauma patient care at comparable quality irrespective of time of admission to the trauma room. These results might be attributable to the standardization of the treatment process using established principles, algorithms and guidelines as well as to the resources available in a level-1 trauma center. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4229611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42296112014-11-14 Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center Parsch, Wolfgang Loibl, Markus Schmucker, Uli Hilber, Franz Nerlich, Michael Ernstberger, Antonio Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Optimal care of multiple trauma patients has to be at a high level around the clock. Trauma care algorithms and guidelines are available, yet it remains unclear if the time of admission to the trauma room affects the quality of care and outcomes. Hence the present study intends to compare the quality of trauma room care of multiple severely injured patients at a level-1 trauma center depending on the time of admission. METHODS: A total of 394 multiple trauma patients with an ISS ≥ 16 were included into this study (observation period: 52 months). Patients were grouped by the time and date of their admission to the trauma room [business hours (BH): weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. vs. non-business hours (NBH): outside BH]. The study analysed differences in patient demographics, trauma room treatment and outcome. RESULTS: The study sample was comparable in all basic characteristics [mean ISS: 32.3 ± 14.3 (BH) vs. 32.6 ± 14.4 (NBH), p = 0.853; mean age: 40.8 ± 21.0 (BH) vs. 37.7 ± 20.2 years (NBH), p = 0.278]. Similar values were found for the time needed for single interventions, like arterial access [4.8 ± 3.9 min (BH) vs. 4.9 ± 3.4 min (NBH), p = 0.496] and quality-assessment parameters, like time until CT [28.5 ± 18.7 min (BH), vs. 27.3 ± 9.5) min (NBH), p = 0.637]. There was no difference for the 24 h mortality and overall hospital mortality in BH and NBH, with 13.5% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.206) and, 21.9% vs. 15.4% (p = 0.144), respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) comparison revealed no difference [3.7 ± 1.6 (BH) vs. 3.9 ± 1.5 (NBH), p = 0.305]. In general, the observed demographic, injury severity, care quality and outcome parameters revealed no significant difference between the two time periods BH and NBH. CONCLUSIONS: The study hospital provides multiple trauma patient care at comparable quality irrespective of time of admission to the trauma room. These results might be attributable to the standardization of the treatment process using established principles, algorithms and guidelines as well as to the resources available in a level-1 trauma center. BioMed Central 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4229611/ /pubmed/25366718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0062-2 Text en © Parsch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Parsch, Wolfgang Loibl, Markus Schmucker, Uli Hilber, Franz Nerlich, Michael Ernstberger, Antonio Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title | Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title_full | Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title_fullStr | Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title_full_unstemmed | Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title_short | Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center |
title_sort | trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a german level-1 trauma center |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25366718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0062-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parschwolfgang traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter AT loiblmarkus traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter AT schmuckeruli traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter AT hilberfranz traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter AT nerlichmichael traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter AT ernstbergerantonio traumacareinsideandoutsidebusinesshourscomparisonofprocessqualityandoutcomeindicatorsinagermanlevel1traumacenter |