Cargando…

Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila

BACKGROUND: Networks of interacting genes and gene products mediate most cellular and developmental processes. High throughput screening methods combined with literature curation are identifying many of the protein-protein interactions (PPI) and protein-DNA interactions (PDI) that constitute these n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murali, Thilakam, Pacifico, Svetlana, Finley, Russell L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24913703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-177
_version_ 1782344156706766848
author Murali, Thilakam
Pacifico, Svetlana
Finley, Russell L
author_facet Murali, Thilakam
Pacifico, Svetlana
Finley, Russell L
author_sort Murali, Thilakam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Networks of interacting genes and gene products mediate most cellular and developmental processes. High throughput screening methods combined with literature curation are identifying many of the protein-protein interactions (PPI) and protein-DNA interactions (PDI) that constitute these networks. Most of the detection methods, however, fail to identify the in vivo spatial or temporal context of the interactions. Thus, the interaction data are a composite of the individual networks that may operate in specific tissues or developmental stages. Genome-wide expression data may be useful for filtering interaction data to identify the subnetworks that operate in specific spatial or temporal contexts. Here we take advantage of the extensive interaction and expression data available for Drosophila to analyze how interaction networks may be unique to specific tissues and developmental stages. RESULTS: We ranked genes on a scale from ubiquitously expressed to tissue or stage specific and examined their interaction patterns. Interestingly, ubiquitously expressed genes have many more interactions among themselves than do non-ubiquitously expressed genes both in PPI and PDI networks. While the PDI network is enriched for interactions between tissue-specific transcription factors and their tissue-specific targets, a preponderance of the PDI interactions are between ubiquitous and non-ubiquitously expressed genes and proteins. In contrast to PDI, PPI networks are depleted for interactions among tissue- or stage- specific proteins, which instead interact primarily with widely expressed proteins. In light of these findings, we present an approach to filter interaction data based on gene expression levels normalized across tissues or developmental stages. We show that this filter (the percent maximum or pmax filter) can be used to identify subnetworks that function within individual tissues or developmental stages. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that protein networks are frequently organized into hubs of widely expressed proteins to which are attached various tissue- or stage-specific proteins. This is consistent with earlier analyses of human PPI data and suggests a similar organization of interaction networks across species. This organization implies that tissue or stage specific networks can be best identified from interactome data by using filters designed to include both ubiquitously expressed and specifically expressed genes and proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4229734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42297342014-11-14 Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila Murali, Thilakam Pacifico, Svetlana Finley, Russell L BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Networks of interacting genes and gene products mediate most cellular and developmental processes. High throughput screening methods combined with literature curation are identifying many of the protein-protein interactions (PPI) and protein-DNA interactions (PDI) that constitute these networks. Most of the detection methods, however, fail to identify the in vivo spatial or temporal context of the interactions. Thus, the interaction data are a composite of the individual networks that may operate in specific tissues or developmental stages. Genome-wide expression data may be useful for filtering interaction data to identify the subnetworks that operate in specific spatial or temporal contexts. Here we take advantage of the extensive interaction and expression data available for Drosophila to analyze how interaction networks may be unique to specific tissues and developmental stages. RESULTS: We ranked genes on a scale from ubiquitously expressed to tissue or stage specific and examined their interaction patterns. Interestingly, ubiquitously expressed genes have many more interactions among themselves than do non-ubiquitously expressed genes both in PPI and PDI networks. While the PDI network is enriched for interactions between tissue-specific transcription factors and their tissue-specific targets, a preponderance of the PDI interactions are between ubiquitous and non-ubiquitously expressed genes and proteins. In contrast to PDI, PPI networks are depleted for interactions among tissue- or stage- specific proteins, which instead interact primarily with widely expressed proteins. In light of these findings, we present an approach to filter interaction data based on gene expression levels normalized across tissues or developmental stages. We show that this filter (the percent maximum or pmax filter) can be used to identify subnetworks that function within individual tissues or developmental stages. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that protein networks are frequently organized into hubs of widely expressed proteins to which are attached various tissue- or stage-specific proteins. This is consistent with earlier analyses of human PPI data and suggests a similar organization of interaction networks across species. This organization implies that tissue or stage specific networks can be best identified from interactome data by using filters designed to include both ubiquitously expressed and specifically expressed genes and proteins. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4229734/ /pubmed/24913703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-177 Text en Copyright © 2014 Murali et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murali, Thilakam
Pacifico, Svetlana
Finley, Russell L
Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title_full Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title_fullStr Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title_short Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila
title_sort integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of drosophila
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24913703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-177
work_keys_str_mv AT muralithilakam integratingtheinteractomeandthetranscriptomeofdrosophila
AT pacificosvetlana integratingtheinteractomeandthetranscriptomeofdrosophila
AT finleyrusselll integratingtheinteractomeandthetranscriptomeofdrosophila