Cargando…
Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial
CONTEXT: Prediction of the child's behavior can adequately equip the dentist in rendering effective and efficient dental treatment. AIM: This study was planned to evaluate and validate a specially prepared questionnaire as a child behavior prediction scale. DESIGN: A two-center cross-sectional...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142821 |
_version_ | 1782344162934259712 |
---|---|
author | Asokan, Sharath Surendran, Sharmila Punugoti, Dedeepya Nuvvula, Sivakumar Geetha Priya, P. R. |
author_facet | Asokan, Sharath Surendran, Sharmila Punugoti, Dedeepya Nuvvula, Sivakumar Geetha Priya, P. R. |
author_sort | Asokan, Sharath |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Prediction of the child's behavior can adequately equip the dentist in rendering effective and efficient dental treatment. AIM: This study was planned to evaluate and validate a specially prepared questionnaire as a child behavior prediction scale. DESIGN: A two-center cross-sectional study was done to validate the new scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children aged 3–12 years (n = 296), from two different centers participated in this study. The questionnaire used was a 10-point observational scale. Observations involved perceiving overt and subtle behavioral characteristics of a child, to assess the child's behavior in the dental office before treatment. An independent observer approached the children and their parents in the waiting room. The child's behavior was then evaluated by the dentist using Frankl behavior rating scale during and after treatment. The prediction of behavior compared to the Frankl scale was assessed and validated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sensitivity, specificity tests, and receiver operating curve analysis were used to validate the new scale and calculate the cut-off score for positive and negative behavior. All data were processed by SPSS software (16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). RESULTS: The best cut-off score to predict a positive Frankl rating was ≥ 8.0 in both the centers. The sensitivity and specificity scores were 93.4% and 62.5% in center 1; 83.1% and 59.6% in center 2 respectively. CONCLUSION: This novel prediction scale can be of great importance in predicting children's behavior in the dental environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4229762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42297622014-11-13 Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial Asokan, Sharath Surendran, Sharmila Punugoti, Dedeepya Nuvvula, Sivakumar Geetha Priya, P. R. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Prediction of the child's behavior can adequately equip the dentist in rendering effective and efficient dental treatment. AIM: This study was planned to evaluate and validate a specially prepared questionnaire as a child behavior prediction scale. DESIGN: A two-center cross-sectional study was done to validate the new scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children aged 3–12 years (n = 296), from two different centers participated in this study. The questionnaire used was a 10-point observational scale. Observations involved perceiving overt and subtle behavioral characteristics of a child, to assess the child's behavior in the dental office before treatment. An independent observer approached the children and their parents in the waiting room. The child's behavior was then evaluated by the dentist using Frankl behavior rating scale during and after treatment. The prediction of behavior compared to the Frankl scale was assessed and validated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sensitivity, specificity tests, and receiver operating curve analysis were used to validate the new scale and calculate the cut-off score for positive and negative behavior. All data were processed by SPSS software (16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). RESULTS: The best cut-off score to predict a positive Frankl rating was ≥ 8.0 in both the centers. The sensitivity and specificity scores were 93.4% and 62.5% in center 1; 83.1% and 59.6% in center 2 respectively. CONCLUSION: This novel prediction scale can be of great importance in predicting children's behavior in the dental environment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4229762/ /pubmed/25395769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142821 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Asokan, Sharath Surendran, Sharmila Punugoti, Dedeepya Nuvvula, Sivakumar Geetha Priya, P. R. Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title | Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title_full | Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title_fullStr | Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title_short | Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial |
title_sort | validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: a two-center trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asokansharath validationofanovelbehaviorpredictionscaleatwocentertrial AT surendransharmila validationofanovelbehaviorpredictionscaleatwocentertrial AT punugotidedeepya validationofanovelbehaviorpredictionscaleatwocentertrial AT nuvvulasivakumar validationofanovelbehaviorpredictionscaleatwocentertrial AT geethapriyapr validationofanovelbehaviorpredictionscaleatwocentertrial |