Cargando…

Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?

INTRODUCTION: WITS appraisal is a common parameter in cephalometrics to assess maxillo-mandibular skeletal relationship as an adjunct to angle ANB. The high variability of the WITS appraisal is attributable to difficulties or inaccuracies in identifying the occlusal plane or variations due to tooth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagar, Shipra, Nagar, Rohit, Raghav, Pradeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395770
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142822
_version_ 1782344163170189312
author Nagar, Shipra
Nagar, Rohit
Raghav, Pradeep
author_facet Nagar, Shipra
Nagar, Rohit
Raghav, Pradeep
author_sort Nagar, Shipra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: WITS appraisal is a common parameter in cephalometrics to assess maxillo-mandibular skeletal relationship as an adjunct to angle ANB. The high variability of the WITS appraisal is attributable to difficulties or inaccuracies in identifying the occlusal plane or variations due to tooth eruption, dental development or treatment changes by vertical movement of incisors, molars, or both. AIM: An extracranial reference line common to both denture bases, instead of the occlusal plane is proposed to assess antero-posterior jaw relationships. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A true vertical obtained by plumb line was recorded, while taking the cephalogram for 40 subjects. A line drawn perpendicular to this true vertical gave a stable and reproducible extracranial true horizontal (HOR) reference line. The linear distance between perpendiculars from points A and B was measured as an adjunct to angle ANB. RESULT: The Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient calculated for the entire sample indicated higher correlation coefficient (r = 0.8712) for the linear measurements on HOR (AH-BH) with respect to the angle ANB when compared with the WITS readings (AO-BO) (r = 0.549). CONCLUSION: The horizontal appraisal method proposed eliminates the demerits of the occlusal plane and has the merits of simplicity and accuracy in comparison to WITS appraisal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4229763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42297632014-11-13 Why WITS? Why not a way beyond? Nagar, Shipra Nagar, Rohit Raghav, Pradeep Contemp Clin Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: WITS appraisal is a common parameter in cephalometrics to assess maxillo-mandibular skeletal relationship as an adjunct to angle ANB. The high variability of the WITS appraisal is attributable to difficulties or inaccuracies in identifying the occlusal plane or variations due to tooth eruption, dental development or treatment changes by vertical movement of incisors, molars, or both. AIM: An extracranial reference line common to both denture bases, instead of the occlusal plane is proposed to assess antero-posterior jaw relationships. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A true vertical obtained by plumb line was recorded, while taking the cephalogram for 40 subjects. A line drawn perpendicular to this true vertical gave a stable and reproducible extracranial true horizontal (HOR) reference line. The linear distance between perpendiculars from points A and B was measured as an adjunct to angle ANB. RESULT: The Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient calculated for the entire sample indicated higher correlation coefficient (r = 0.8712) for the linear measurements on HOR (AH-BH) with respect to the angle ANB when compared with the WITS readings (AO-BO) (r = 0.549). CONCLUSION: The horizontal appraisal method proposed eliminates the demerits of the occlusal plane and has the merits of simplicity and accuracy in comparison to WITS appraisal. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4229763/ /pubmed/25395770 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142822 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nagar, Shipra
Nagar, Rohit
Raghav, Pradeep
Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title_full Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title_fullStr Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title_full_unstemmed Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title_short Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
title_sort why wits? why not a way beyond?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395770
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.142822
work_keys_str_mv AT nagarshipra whywitswhynotawaybeyond
AT nagarrohit whywitswhynotawaybeyond
AT raghavpradeep whywitswhynotawaybeyond