Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study
BACKGROUND: Debonding of brackets commonly occurs during orthodontic treatment. Due to increase in costs replacement of a damaged bracket is not liked by the dentist. This study is done to assess the shear bond strength of recycled brackets using different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395785 |
_version_ | 1782344177198039040 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Mukesh Maheshwari, Amit Lall, Rajeev Navit, Pragati Singh, Rajeshwar Navit, S |
author_facet | Kumar, Mukesh Maheshwari, Amit Lall, Rajeev Navit, Pragati Singh, Rajeshwar Navit, S |
author_sort | Kumar, Mukesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Debonding of brackets commonly occurs during orthodontic treatment. Due to increase in costs replacement of a damaged bracket is not liked by the dentist. This study is done to assess the shear bond strength of recycled brackets using different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using five groups of orthodontic brackets (0.022” × 0.028”, MBT prescription) bonded on the premolars mounted in cubes. Other materials required were cubical trays, bonding material, light cure unit, universal testing machine, digital camera and sandblasting unit. RESULTS: From the result of ANOVA test we observed the test is significant (F = 20.79, P < 0.01) and the test is rejected. When the Tukey’s t-test result was applied it was seen that the mean shear bond strength of all groups of brackets is as follows: Group I (5.31 Megapascals [Mpa]) < Group II (7.37 Mpa) < Group III (8.96 Mpa) < Group IV (5.56 Mpa) < Control group (9.24 Mpa). Alternatively we can say that shear bond strength of following bracket groups can be arranged as Group I < Group IV < Group II < Group III. CONCLUSION: From this study we conclude that Group III, which was recycled with an ultrasonic cleaner with electropolisher and silane coupling agent in place of primer, showed the highest shear bond strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4229830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42298302014-11-13 Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study Kumar, Mukesh Maheshwari, Amit Lall, Rajeev Navit, Pragati Singh, Rajeshwar Navit, S J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Debonding of brackets commonly occurs during orthodontic treatment. Due to increase in costs replacement of a damaged bracket is not liked by the dentist. This study is done to assess the shear bond strength of recycled brackets using different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using five groups of orthodontic brackets (0.022” × 0.028”, MBT prescription) bonded on the premolars mounted in cubes. Other materials required were cubical trays, bonding material, light cure unit, universal testing machine, digital camera and sandblasting unit. RESULTS: From the result of ANOVA test we observed the test is significant (F = 20.79, P < 0.01) and the test is rejected. When the Tukey’s t-test result was applied it was seen that the mean shear bond strength of all groups of brackets is as follows: Group I (5.31 Megapascals [Mpa]) < Group II (7.37 Mpa) < Group III (8.96 Mpa) < Group IV (5.56 Mpa) < Control group (9.24 Mpa). Alternatively we can say that shear bond strength of following bracket groups can be arranged as Group I < Group IV < Group II < Group III. CONCLUSION: From this study we conclude that Group III, which was recycled with an ultrasonic cleaner with electropolisher and silane coupling agent in place of primer, showed the highest shear bond strength. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4229830/ /pubmed/25395785 Text en Copyright: © J. Int Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kumar, Mukesh Maheshwari, Amit Lall, Rajeev Navit, Pragati Singh, Rajeshwar Navit, S Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using Different Methods: An In vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of recycled brackets using different methods: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarmukesh comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy AT maheshwariamit comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy AT lallrajeev comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy AT navitpragati comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy AT singhrajeshwar comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy AT navits comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofrecycledbracketsusingdifferentmethodsaninvitrostudy |