Cargando…
Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315 |
_version_ | 1782344181081964544 |
---|---|
author | Harnoss, Julian C Brune, Laura Ansorg, Jörg Heidecke, Claus-Dieter Assadian, Ojan Kramer, Axel |
author_facet | Harnoss, Julian C Brune, Laura Ansorg, Jörg Heidecke, Claus-Dieter Assadian, Ojan Kramer, Axel |
author_sort | Harnoss, Julian C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. METHODS: A 10 weeks-survey among German surgeons as well as an experimental crossover study involving 26 participants were conducted. The immediate and sustainable efficacy (IE/SE) of surgical hand rub and participants’ hand moisture were measured after an 8-day usage of SP/SC, as well as the influence on micro-perforations on surgical gloves. RESULTS: The questionnaire was available to 16,000 German surgeons. Thereof, 1,771 surgeons accessed the questionnaire, representing a total participation rate of 11%. As 19% (n = 338) of questionnaires were incomplete, a total of 1,433 completed questionnaires were available for further analysis. More than 75% of the participants stated not to use any SP/SC, yet, almost 50% suffered from skin irritation or discomfort. Only 5% used SP/SC at the beginning of their shift. 10% refused to use SP/SC because of concerns that SP/SC may reduce the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. After usage of SP/SC over 8-days, skin moisture was significantly higher (P < 0.001), whereas no significant influence on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub was observed (IE: P = 0.135; SP: P = 0.681). Micro-perforations were detected in 8/52 surgical gloves (15%), with no statistical significant difference between SP/SC users (n = 2/26; 8%) and non-users (n = 6/26; 23%; P = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: Following the results of this largest questionnaire base survey among German surgeons on skin care, there is a need to educate and inform surgeons on the correct application and the concept of SP/SC strategies. In the present study, the combination of selected SP/SC products and one alcohol-based hand rub formulation did not show a negative interaction with surgical hand rub or surgical glove perforation. However, it is advisable to ascertain the compatibility of SP/SC products with the used hand disinfectant prior to purchase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4229856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42298562014-11-14 Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation Harnoss, Julian C Brune, Laura Ansorg, Jörg Heidecke, Claus-Dieter Assadian, Ojan Kramer, Axel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. METHODS: A 10 weeks-survey among German surgeons as well as an experimental crossover study involving 26 participants were conducted. The immediate and sustainable efficacy (IE/SE) of surgical hand rub and participants’ hand moisture were measured after an 8-day usage of SP/SC, as well as the influence on micro-perforations on surgical gloves. RESULTS: The questionnaire was available to 16,000 German surgeons. Thereof, 1,771 surgeons accessed the questionnaire, representing a total participation rate of 11%. As 19% (n = 338) of questionnaires were incomplete, a total of 1,433 completed questionnaires were available for further analysis. More than 75% of the participants stated not to use any SP/SC, yet, almost 50% suffered from skin irritation or discomfort. Only 5% used SP/SC at the beginning of their shift. 10% refused to use SP/SC because of concerns that SP/SC may reduce the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. After usage of SP/SC over 8-days, skin moisture was significantly higher (P < 0.001), whereas no significant influence on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub was observed (IE: P = 0.135; SP: P = 0.681). Micro-perforations were detected in 8/52 surgical gloves (15%), with no statistical significant difference between SP/SC users (n = 2/26; 8%) and non-users (n = 6/26; 23%; P = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: Following the results of this largest questionnaire base survey among German surgeons on skin care, there is a need to educate and inform surgeons on the correct application and the concept of SP/SC strategies. In the present study, the combination of selected SP/SC products and one alcohol-based hand rub formulation did not show a negative interaction with surgical hand rub or surgical glove perforation. However, it is advisable to ascertain the compatibility of SP/SC products with the used hand disinfectant prior to purchase. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4229856/ /pubmed/24912541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315 Text en Copyright © 2014 Harnoss et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harnoss, Julian C Brune, Laura Ansorg, Jörg Heidecke, Claus-Dieter Assadian, Ojan Kramer, Axel Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title | Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title_full | Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title_fullStr | Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title_short | Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
title_sort | practice of skin protection and skin care among german surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harnossjulianc practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation AT brunelaura practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation AT ansorgjorg practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation AT heideckeclausdieter practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation AT assadianojan practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation AT krameraxel practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation |