Cargando…

Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation

BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harnoss, Julian C, Brune, Laura, Ansorg, Jörg, Heidecke, Claus-Dieter, Assadian, Ojan, Kramer, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315
_version_ 1782344181081964544
author Harnoss, Julian C
Brune, Laura
Ansorg, Jörg
Heidecke, Claus-Dieter
Assadian, Ojan
Kramer, Axel
author_facet Harnoss, Julian C
Brune, Laura
Ansorg, Jörg
Heidecke, Claus-Dieter
Assadian, Ojan
Kramer, Axel
author_sort Harnoss, Julian C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. METHODS: A 10 weeks-survey among German surgeons as well as an experimental crossover study involving 26 participants were conducted. The immediate and sustainable efficacy (IE/SE) of surgical hand rub and participants’ hand moisture were measured after an 8-day usage of SP/SC, as well as the influence on micro-perforations on surgical gloves. RESULTS: The questionnaire was available to 16,000 German surgeons. Thereof, 1,771 surgeons accessed the questionnaire, representing a total participation rate of 11%. As 19% (n = 338) of questionnaires were incomplete, a total of 1,433 completed questionnaires were available for further analysis. More than 75% of the participants stated not to use any SP/SC, yet, almost 50% suffered from skin irritation or discomfort. Only 5% used SP/SC at the beginning of their shift. 10% refused to use SP/SC because of concerns that SP/SC may reduce the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. After usage of SP/SC over 8-days, skin moisture was significantly higher (P < 0.001), whereas no significant influence on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub was observed (IE: P = 0.135; SP: P = 0.681). Micro-perforations were detected in 8/52 surgical gloves (15%), with no statistical significant difference between SP/SC users (n = 2/26; 8%) and non-users (n = 6/26; 23%; P = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: Following the results of this largest questionnaire base survey among German surgeons on skin care, there is a need to educate and inform surgeons on the correct application and the concept of SP/SC strategies. In the present study, the combination of selected SP/SC products and one alcohol-based hand rub formulation did not show a negative interaction with surgical hand rub or surgical glove perforation. However, it is advisable to ascertain the compatibility of SP/SC products with the used hand disinfectant prior to purchase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4229856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42298562014-11-14 Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation Harnoss, Julian C Brune, Laura Ansorg, Jörg Heidecke, Claus-Dieter Assadian, Ojan Kramer, Axel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. METHODS: A 10 weeks-survey among German surgeons as well as an experimental crossover study involving 26 participants were conducted. The immediate and sustainable efficacy (IE/SE) of surgical hand rub and participants’ hand moisture were measured after an 8-day usage of SP/SC, as well as the influence on micro-perforations on surgical gloves. RESULTS: The questionnaire was available to 16,000 German surgeons. Thereof, 1,771 surgeons accessed the questionnaire, representing a total participation rate of 11%. As 19% (n = 338) of questionnaires were incomplete, a total of 1,433 completed questionnaires were available for further analysis. More than 75% of the participants stated not to use any SP/SC, yet, almost 50% suffered from skin irritation or discomfort. Only 5% used SP/SC at the beginning of their shift. 10% refused to use SP/SC because of concerns that SP/SC may reduce the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. After usage of SP/SC over 8-days, skin moisture was significantly higher (P < 0.001), whereas no significant influence on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub was observed (IE: P = 0.135; SP: P = 0.681). Micro-perforations were detected in 8/52 surgical gloves (15%), with no statistical significant difference between SP/SC users (n = 2/26; 8%) and non-users (n = 6/26; 23%; P = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: Following the results of this largest questionnaire base survey among German surgeons on skin care, there is a need to educate and inform surgeons on the correct application and the concept of SP/SC strategies. In the present study, the combination of selected SP/SC products and one alcohol-based hand rub formulation did not show a negative interaction with surgical hand rub or surgical glove perforation. However, it is advisable to ascertain the compatibility of SP/SC products with the used hand disinfectant prior to purchase. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4229856/ /pubmed/24912541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315 Text en Copyright © 2014 Harnoss et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harnoss, Julian C
Brune, Laura
Ansorg, Jörg
Heidecke, Claus-Dieter
Assadian, Ojan
Kramer, Axel
Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title_full Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title_fullStr Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title_full_unstemmed Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title_short Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
title_sort practice of skin protection and skin care among german surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-315
work_keys_str_mv AT harnossjulianc practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation
AT brunelaura practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation
AT ansorgjorg practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation
AT heideckeclausdieter practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation
AT assadianojan practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation
AT krameraxel practiceofskinprotectionandskincareamonggermansurgeonsandinfluenceontheefficacyofsurgicalhanddisinfectionandsurgicalgloveperforation