Cargando…

Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials

We assessed the geometric distortion of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images with the Leksell skull frame system using three types of cranial quick fixation screws (QFSs) of different materials—aluminum, aluminum with tungsten tip, and titanium—for skull frame fixation. Two kinds o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakazawa, Hisato, Mori, Yoshimasa, Yamamuro, Osamu, Komori, Masataka, Shibamoto, Yuta, Uchiyama, Yukio, Tsugawa, Takahiko, Hagiwara, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25034732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru064
_version_ 1782344193611399168
author Nakazawa, Hisato
Mori, Yoshimasa
Yamamuro, Osamu
Komori, Masataka
Shibamoto, Yuta
Uchiyama, Yukio
Tsugawa, Takahiko
Hagiwara, Masahiro
author_facet Nakazawa, Hisato
Mori, Yoshimasa
Yamamuro, Osamu
Komori, Masataka
Shibamoto, Yuta
Uchiyama, Yukio
Tsugawa, Takahiko
Hagiwara, Masahiro
author_sort Nakazawa, Hisato
collection PubMed
description We assessed the geometric distortion of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images with the Leksell skull frame system using three types of cranial quick fixation screws (QFSs) of different materials—aluminum, aluminum with tungsten tip, and titanium—for skull frame fixation. Two kinds of acrylic phantoms were placed on a Leksell skull frame using the three types of screws, and were scanned with computed tomography (CT), 1.5-T MR imaging and 3.0-T MR imaging. The 3D coordinates for both strengths of MR imaging were compared with those for CT. The deviations of the measured coordinates at selected points (x = 50, 100 and 150; y = 50, 100 and 150) were indicated on different axial planes (z = 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150). The errors of coordinates with QFSs of aluminum, tungsten-tipped aluminum, and titanium were <1.0, 1.0 and 2.0 mm in the entire treatable area, respectively, with 1.5 T. In the 3.0-T field, the errors with aluminum QFSs were <1.0 mm only around the center, while the errors with tungsten-tipped aluminum and titanium were >2.0 mm in most positions. The geometric accuracy of the Leksell skull frame system with 1.5-T MR imaging was high and valid for clinical use. However, the geometric errors with 3.0-T MR imaging were larger than those of 1.5-T MR imaging and were acceptable only with aluminum QFSs, and then only around the central region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4229929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42299292014-11-21 Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials Nakazawa, Hisato Mori, Yoshimasa Yamamuro, Osamu Komori, Masataka Shibamoto, Yuta Uchiyama, Yukio Tsugawa, Takahiko Hagiwara, Masahiro J Radiat Res Technology We assessed the geometric distortion of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images with the Leksell skull frame system using three types of cranial quick fixation screws (QFSs) of different materials—aluminum, aluminum with tungsten tip, and titanium—for skull frame fixation. Two kinds of acrylic phantoms were placed on a Leksell skull frame using the three types of screws, and were scanned with computed tomography (CT), 1.5-T MR imaging and 3.0-T MR imaging. The 3D coordinates for both strengths of MR imaging were compared with those for CT. The deviations of the measured coordinates at selected points (x = 50, 100 and 150; y = 50, 100 and 150) were indicated on different axial planes (z = 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150). The errors of coordinates with QFSs of aluminum, tungsten-tipped aluminum, and titanium were <1.0, 1.0 and 2.0 mm in the entire treatable area, respectively, with 1.5 T. In the 3.0-T field, the errors with aluminum QFSs were <1.0 mm only around the center, while the errors with tungsten-tipped aluminum and titanium were >2.0 mm in most positions. The geometric accuracy of the Leksell skull frame system with 1.5-T MR imaging was high and valid for clinical use. However, the geometric errors with 3.0-T MR imaging were larger than those of 1.5-T MR imaging and were acceptable only with aluminum QFSs, and then only around the central region. Oxford University Press 2014-11 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4229929/ /pubmed/25034732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru064 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technology
Nakazawa, Hisato
Mori, Yoshimasa
Yamamuro, Osamu
Komori, Masataka
Shibamoto, Yuta
Uchiyama, Yukio
Tsugawa, Takahiko
Hagiwara, Masahiro
Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title_full Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title_fullStr Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title_full_unstemmed Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title_short Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
title_sort geometric accuracy of 3d coordinates of the leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 tesla- and 3.0 tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
topic Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25034732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru064
work_keys_str_mv AT nakazawahisato geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT moriyoshimasa geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT yamamuroosamu geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT komorimasataka geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT shibamotoyuta geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT uchiyamayukio geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT tsugawatakahiko geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials
AT hagiwaramasahiro geometricaccuracyof3dcoordinatesoftheleksellstereotacticskullframein15teslaand30teslamagneticresonanceimagingacomparisonofthreedifferentfixationscrewmaterials