Cargando…

Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants

BACKGROUND: A system providing disabled persons with control of various assistive devices with the tongue has been developed at Aalborg University in Denmark. The system requires an activation unit attached to the tongue with a small piercing. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bentsen, Bo, Gaihede, Michael, Lontis, Romulus, Andreasen Struijk, Lotte NS
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24684776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-44
_version_ 1782344248876597248
author Bentsen, Bo
Gaihede, Michael
Lontis, Romulus
Andreasen Struijk, Lotte NS
author_facet Bentsen, Bo
Gaihede, Michael
Lontis, Romulus
Andreasen Struijk, Lotte NS
author_sort Bentsen, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A system providing disabled persons with control of various assistive devices with the tongue has been developed at Aalborg University in Denmark. The system requires an activation unit attached to the tongue with a small piercing. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a safe and tolerable procedure for medical tongue piercing and to evaluate the expected and perceived procedural discomfort. METHODS: Four tetraplegic subjects volunteered for the study. A surgical protocol for a safe insertion of a tongue barbell piercing was presented using sterilized instruments and piercing parts. Moreover, post-procedural observations of participant complications such as bleeding, edema, and infection were recorded. Finally, procedural discomforts were monitored by VAS scores of pain, changes in taste and speech as well as problems related to hitting the teeth. RESULTS: The piercings were all successfully inserted in less than 5 min and the pain level was moderate compared with oral injections. No bleeding, infection, embedding of the piercing, or tooth/gingival injuries were encountered; a moderate edema was found in one case without affecting the speech. In two cases the piercing rod later had to be replaced by a shorter rod, because participants complained that the rod hit their teeth. The replacements prevented further problems. Moreover, loosening of balls was encountered, which could be prevented with the addition of dental glue. No cases of swallowing or aspiration of the piercing parts were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure proved simple, fast, and safe for insertion of tongue piercings for tetraplegic subjects in a clinical setting. The procedure represented several precautions in order to avoid risks in these susceptible participants with possible co-morbidity. No serious complications were encountered, and the procedure was found tolerable to the participants. The procedure may be used in future studies with tongue piercings being a prerequisite for similar systems, and this may include insertion in an out-patient setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4230317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42303172014-11-14 Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants Bentsen, Bo Gaihede, Michael Lontis, Romulus Andreasen Struijk, Lotte NS J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: A system providing disabled persons with control of various assistive devices with the tongue has been developed at Aalborg University in Denmark. The system requires an activation unit attached to the tongue with a small piercing. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a safe and tolerable procedure for medical tongue piercing and to evaluate the expected and perceived procedural discomfort. METHODS: Four tetraplegic subjects volunteered for the study. A surgical protocol for a safe insertion of a tongue barbell piercing was presented using sterilized instruments and piercing parts. Moreover, post-procedural observations of participant complications such as bleeding, edema, and infection were recorded. Finally, procedural discomforts were monitored by VAS scores of pain, changes in taste and speech as well as problems related to hitting the teeth. RESULTS: The piercings were all successfully inserted in less than 5 min and the pain level was moderate compared with oral injections. No bleeding, infection, embedding of the piercing, or tooth/gingival injuries were encountered; a moderate edema was found in one case without affecting the speech. In two cases the piercing rod later had to be replaced by a shorter rod, because participants complained that the rod hit their teeth. The replacements prevented further problems. Moreover, loosening of balls was encountered, which could be prevented with the addition of dental glue. No cases of swallowing or aspiration of the piercing parts were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure proved simple, fast, and safe for insertion of tongue piercings for tetraplegic subjects in a clinical setting. The procedure represented several precautions in order to avoid risks in these susceptible participants with possible co-morbidity. No serious complications were encountered, and the procedure was found tolerable to the participants. The procedure may be used in future studies with tongue piercings being a prerequisite for similar systems, and this may include insertion in an out-patient setting. BioMed Central 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4230317/ /pubmed/24684776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-44 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bentsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Bentsen, Bo
Gaihede, Michael
Lontis, Romulus
Andreasen Struijk, Lotte NS
Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title_full Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title_fullStr Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title_full_unstemmed Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title_short Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
title_sort medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24684776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-44
work_keys_str_mv AT bentsenbo medicaltonguepiercingdevelopmentandevaluationofasurgicalprotocolandtheperceptionofproceduraldiscomfortoftheparticipants
AT gaihedemichael medicaltonguepiercingdevelopmentandevaluationofasurgicalprotocolandtheperceptionofproceduraldiscomfortoftheparticipants
AT lontisromulus medicaltonguepiercingdevelopmentandevaluationofasurgicalprotocolandtheperceptionofproceduraldiscomfortoftheparticipants
AT andreasenstruijklottens medicaltonguepiercingdevelopmentandevaluationofasurgicalprotocolandtheperceptionofproceduraldiscomfortoftheparticipants