Cargando…
Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC)
The Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R) has been widely adopted across cultures to assess common mental disorders. We assessed the factorial validity of the CIS‐R across ethnic minority groups, using data from a nationally representative survey conducted in England in 2000. The sample comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1428 |
_version_ | 1782344251427782656 |
---|---|
author | Das‐Munshi, Jayati Castro‐Costa, Erico Dewey, Michael E. Nazroo, James Prince, Martin |
author_facet | Das‐Munshi, Jayati Castro‐Costa, Erico Dewey, Michael E. Nazroo, James Prince, Martin |
author_sort | Das‐Munshi, Jayati |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R) has been widely adopted across cultures to assess common mental disorders. We assessed the factorial validity of the CIS‐R across ethnic minority groups, using data from a nationally representative survey conducted in England in 2000. The sample comprised White British (n = 837), Irish (n = 733), Black Caribbean (n = 694), Bangladeshi (n = 650), Indian (n = 643) and Pakistani (n = 724) respondents. Ordered logistic regression determined the reporting of CIS‐R symptoms. Principal components analysis (PCA) determined the underlying construct of the CIS‐R in White British participants. These factor solutions were then assessed for “best fit” using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) across all ethnic groups. In ordered logistic regression analyses, there was heterogeneity in the reporting of worries, phobias, panic and somatic symptoms across ethnic minority groups relative to the White British group. “Best” fit solutions confirmed through CFA were models where all symptoms were allowed to vary across ethnic groups, or models where an underlying “depression‐anxiety” construct was held invariant while “somatic symptoms” were permitted to vary across groups, although differences between models assessed were slight. In conclusion, there may be benefits in assessing the functioning of certain CIS‐R items within specific cultural contexts to ensure adequate face validity of the CIS‐R. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4230331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42303312014-12-11 Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) Das‐Munshi, Jayati Castro‐Costa, Erico Dewey, Michael E. Nazroo, James Prince, Martin Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Research Articles The Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R) has been widely adopted across cultures to assess common mental disorders. We assessed the factorial validity of the CIS‐R across ethnic minority groups, using data from a nationally representative survey conducted in England in 2000. The sample comprised White British (n = 837), Irish (n = 733), Black Caribbean (n = 694), Bangladeshi (n = 650), Indian (n = 643) and Pakistani (n = 724) respondents. Ordered logistic regression determined the reporting of CIS‐R symptoms. Principal components analysis (PCA) determined the underlying construct of the CIS‐R in White British participants. These factor solutions were then assessed for “best fit” using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) across all ethnic groups. In ordered logistic regression analyses, there was heterogeneity in the reporting of worries, phobias, panic and somatic symptoms across ethnic minority groups relative to the White British group. “Best” fit solutions confirmed through CFA were models where all symptoms were allowed to vary across ethnic groups, or models where an underlying “depression‐anxiety” construct was held invariant while “somatic symptoms” were permitted to vary across groups, although differences between models assessed were slight. In conclusion, there may be benefits in assessing the functioning of certain CIS‐R items within specific cultural contexts to ensure adequate face validity of the CIS‐R. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4230331/ /pubmed/24478128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1428 Text en © 2014 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Das‐Munshi, Jayati Castro‐Costa, Erico Dewey, Michael E. Nazroo, James Prince, Martin Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title | Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title_full | Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title_fullStr | Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title_short | Cross‐cultural factorial validation of the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS‐R); findings from a nationally representative survey (EMPIRIC) |
title_sort | cross‐cultural factorial validation of the clinical interview schedule – revised (cis‐r); findings from a nationally representative survey (empiric) |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasmunshijayati crossculturalfactorialvalidationoftheclinicalinterviewschedulerevisedcisrfindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyempiric AT castrocostaerico crossculturalfactorialvalidationoftheclinicalinterviewschedulerevisedcisrfindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyempiric AT deweymichaele crossculturalfactorialvalidationoftheclinicalinterviewschedulerevisedcisrfindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyempiric AT nazroojames crossculturalfactorialvalidationoftheclinicalinterviewschedulerevisedcisrfindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyempiric AT princemartin crossculturalfactorialvalidationoftheclinicalinterviewschedulerevisedcisrfindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyempiric |