Cargando…

An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests exercise may benefit patients with advanced progressive illness and some hospice day services now provide dedicated gym space. However, supporting data for such a service development are limited. We describe patient referrals, interventions, feedback, and potential impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talbot Rice, Helena, Malcolm, Lorna, Norman, Kate, Jones, Alison, Lee, Katherine, Preston, Gail, McKenzie, David, Maddocks, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Maney Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743291X14Y.0000000083
_version_ 1782344251896496128
author Talbot Rice, Helena
Malcolm, Lorna
Norman, Kate
Jones, Alison
Lee, Katherine
Preston, Gail
McKenzie, David
Maddocks, Matthew
author_facet Talbot Rice, Helena
Malcolm, Lorna
Norman, Kate
Jones, Alison
Lee, Katherine
Preston, Gail
McKenzie, David
Maddocks, Matthew
author_sort Talbot Rice, Helena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests exercise may benefit patients with advanced progressive illness and some hospice day services now provide dedicated gym space. However, supporting data for such a service development are limited. We describe patient referrals, interventions, feedback, and potential impact of a nine-session, outpatient, hospice-based, circuit exercise programme. METHODS: Consecutive referrals to physiotherapy over a 6-month period commencing March 2013 were followed prospectively. Physical function (short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), psychological well-being (General Health Questionnaire), and patient satisfaction (FACIT-PS) were assessed pre- and post-programme. RESULTS: Of 212 referrals, 61 (29%) with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses (median [inter-quartile range] survival 67 [50–137] days) were considered appropriate for the circuits of whom 54 (89%) started. There were no statistical differences between those completing and not-completing with regards to age, diagnosis, social status, or survival. In completers (n = 28), 4-m gait speed (mean Δ [95% confidence intervals] 0.23 [0.03, 0.44] m/seconds), five sit-to-stand time (mean Δ −5.44 [−10.43, −0.46] seconds) and overall SPPB score changed statistically, while grip strength did not (mean Δ 0.65 [−1.39, 2.96] kg). Psychological well-being, quality of life, and fatigue remained unchanged. Patients felt the physiotherapists gave clear explanations, understood their needs, and would recommend the service to others. CONCLUSION: A hospice-based programme is one way to offer exercise to a range of patients with advanced progressive illness. Despite excellent feedback, only half of patients completed the nine-session programme in full and evidence of benefit was limited. Future work should explore the broader benefits of participation and whether delivering programmes or elements of them in shorter time frames is more beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4230333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Maney Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42303332014-11-18 An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback Talbot Rice, Helena Malcolm, Lorna Norman, Kate Jones, Alison Lee, Katherine Preston, Gail McKenzie, David Maddocks, Matthew Prog Palliat Care Articles BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests exercise may benefit patients with advanced progressive illness and some hospice day services now provide dedicated gym space. However, supporting data for such a service development are limited. We describe patient referrals, interventions, feedback, and potential impact of a nine-session, outpatient, hospice-based, circuit exercise programme. METHODS: Consecutive referrals to physiotherapy over a 6-month period commencing March 2013 were followed prospectively. Physical function (short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), psychological well-being (General Health Questionnaire), and patient satisfaction (FACIT-PS) were assessed pre- and post-programme. RESULTS: Of 212 referrals, 61 (29%) with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses (median [inter-quartile range] survival 67 [50–137] days) were considered appropriate for the circuits of whom 54 (89%) started. There were no statistical differences between those completing and not-completing with regards to age, diagnosis, social status, or survival. In completers (n = 28), 4-m gait speed (mean Δ [95% confidence intervals] 0.23 [0.03, 0.44] m/seconds), five sit-to-stand time (mean Δ −5.44 [−10.43, −0.46] seconds) and overall SPPB score changed statistically, while grip strength did not (mean Δ 0.65 [−1.39, 2.96] kg). Psychological well-being, quality of life, and fatigue remained unchanged. Patients felt the physiotherapists gave clear explanations, understood their needs, and would recommend the service to others. CONCLUSION: A hospice-based programme is one way to offer exercise to a range of patients with advanced progressive illness. Despite excellent feedback, only half of patients completed the nine-session programme in full and evidence of benefit was limited. Future work should explore the broader benefits of participation and whether delivering programmes or elements of them in shorter time frames is more beneficial. Maney Publishing 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4230333/ /pubmed/25414550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743291X14Y.0000000083 Text en © W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ MORE OpenChoice articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 3.0
spellingShingle Articles
Talbot Rice, Helena
Malcolm, Lorna
Norman, Kate
Jones, Alison
Lee, Katherine
Preston, Gail
McKenzie, David
Maddocks, Matthew
An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title_full An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title_fullStr An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title_short An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
title_sort evaluation of the st christopher's hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743291X14Y.0000000083
work_keys_str_mv AT talbotricehelena anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT malcolmlorna anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT normankate anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT jonesalison anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT leekatherine anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT prestongail anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT mckenziedavid anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT maddocksmatthew anevaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT talbotricehelena evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT malcolmlorna evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT normankate evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT jonesalison evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT leekatherine evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT prestongail evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT mckenziedavid evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback
AT maddocksmatthew evaluationofthestchristophershospicerehabilitationgymcircuitsclassespatientuptakeoutcomesandfeedback