Cargando…

How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†

BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the professional education for Swiss physiotherapists has been upgraded to a tertiary educational level. With this change, the need for research related to professional practice has become more salient. The elaboration of research priorities is seen as a possible way to deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoeb, Veronika, Rau, Barbara, Nast, Irina, Schmid, Stefan, Barbero, Marco, Tal, Amir, Kool, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23780913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1560
_version_ 1782344276739358720
author Schoeb, Veronika
Rau, Barbara
Nast, Irina
Schmid, Stefan
Barbero, Marco
Tal, Amir
Kool, Jan
author_facet Schoeb, Veronika
Rau, Barbara
Nast, Irina
Schmid, Stefan
Barbero, Marco
Tal, Amir
Kool, Jan
author_sort Schoeb, Veronika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the professional education for Swiss physiotherapists has been upgraded to a tertiary educational level. With this change, the need for research related to professional practice has become more salient. The elaboration of research priorities is seen as a possible way to determine the profession's needs, to help coordinate research collaborations and to address expectations regarding physiotherapy. There is still limited evidence about stakeholders' views with regard to physiotherapy research. The objective of this study was to investigate key stakeholders' opinions about research in physiotherapy in Switzerland. METHODS: Focus groups with patients, health professionals, researchers and representatives of public health organizations were conducted, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with politicians, health insurers and medical doctors from three linguistic regions in Switzerland. An interview guide was elaborated. Data were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis (Atlas-ti 6®). RESULTS: Eighteen focus groups and 23 interviews/written commentaries included 134 participants with various research experiences and from different settings. Fourteen categories were defined reflecting three themes: identity, interdisciplinarity and visibility. Stakeholders had positive views about the profession and perceived physiotherapists' important role now and in the future. Yet, they also felt that physiotherapy was not sufficiently recognized in society and not visible enough. A stronger professional identity would be key to enhancing interdisciplinary work. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this qualitative study provide insights into key aspects for moving the physiotherapy profession forward. Identity is at the heart of physiotherapy, not necessarily in terms of research priorities but in the definition of domains of competence and future positioning. Identity is also tightly connected to Interdisciplinarity as this might threaten the existence of the profession. Stakeholders outside the profession insist on the importance of visibility. The results of this study can help stakeholders reflect on the future of physiotherapy and elaborate research priorities. © 2013 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4230476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42304762014-12-11 How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study† Schoeb, Veronika Rau, Barbara Nast, Irina Schmid, Stefan Barbero, Marco Tal, Amir Kool, Jan Physiother Res Int Research Articles BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the professional education for Swiss physiotherapists has been upgraded to a tertiary educational level. With this change, the need for research related to professional practice has become more salient. The elaboration of research priorities is seen as a possible way to determine the profession's needs, to help coordinate research collaborations and to address expectations regarding physiotherapy. There is still limited evidence about stakeholders' views with regard to physiotherapy research. The objective of this study was to investigate key stakeholders' opinions about research in physiotherapy in Switzerland. METHODS: Focus groups with patients, health professionals, researchers and representatives of public health organizations were conducted, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with politicians, health insurers and medical doctors from three linguistic regions in Switzerland. An interview guide was elaborated. Data were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis (Atlas-ti 6®). RESULTS: Eighteen focus groups and 23 interviews/written commentaries included 134 participants with various research experiences and from different settings. Fourteen categories were defined reflecting three themes: identity, interdisciplinarity and visibility. Stakeholders had positive views about the profession and perceived physiotherapists' important role now and in the future. Yet, they also felt that physiotherapy was not sufficiently recognized in society and not visible enough. A stronger professional identity would be key to enhancing interdisciplinary work. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this qualitative study provide insights into key aspects for moving the physiotherapy profession forward. Identity is at the heart of physiotherapy, not necessarily in terms of research priorities but in the definition of domains of competence and future positioning. Identity is also tightly connected to Interdisciplinarity as this might threaten the existence of the profession. Stakeholders outside the profession insist on the importance of visibility. The results of this study can help stakeholders reflect on the future of physiotherapy and elaborate research priorities. © 2013 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-06 2013-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4230476/ /pubmed/23780913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1560 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Schoeb, Veronika
Rau, Barbara
Nast, Irina
Schmid, Stefan
Barbero, Marco
Tal, Amir
Kool, Jan
How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title_full How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title_fullStr How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title_full_unstemmed How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title_short How do Patients, Politicians, Physiotherapists and Other Health Professionals View Physiotherapy Research in Switzerland? A Qualitative Study†
title_sort how do patients, politicians, physiotherapists and other health professionals view physiotherapy research in switzerland? a qualitative study†
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23780913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1560
work_keys_str_mv AT schoebveronika howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT raubarbara howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT nastirina howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT schmidstefan howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT barberomarco howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT talamir howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy
AT kooljan howdopatientspoliticiansphysiotherapistsandotherhealthprofessionalsviewphysiotherapyresearchinswitzerlandaqualitativestudy