Cargando…
SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
BACKGROUND: Systematic Reviews (SRs) of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, but awareness of the merits of conducting such SRs is steadily increasing. As animal intervention studies differ from randomized clinical trials (RCT) in many aspects, the methodology for SRs of clinical...
Autores principales: | Hooijmans, Carlijn R, Rovers, Maroeska M, de Vries, Rob BM, Leenaars, Marlies, Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel, Langendam, Miranda W |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24667063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Improving planning, design, reporting and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase
por: de Vries, Rob B M, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Meta-Analyses of Animal Studies: An Introduction of a Valuable Instrument to Further Improve Healthcare
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
por: van Luijk, Judith, et al.
Publicado: (2014)