Cargando…
Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies
INTRODUCTION: Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) was the first critical care prognostic model developed from worldwide data. We aimed to systematically review studies that assessed the prognostic performance of SAPS 3 general and customized models for predicting hospital mortality in adult...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24906651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13911 |
_version_ | 1782344365504462848 |
---|---|
author | Nassar, Antonio Paulo Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sa Moreno, Rui |
author_facet | Nassar, Antonio Paulo Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sa Moreno, Rui |
author_sort | Nassar, Antonio Paulo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) was the first critical care prognostic model developed from worldwide data. We aimed to systematically review studies that assessed the prognostic performance of SAPS 3 general and customized models for predicting hospital mortality in adult patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Medline, Lilacs, Scielo and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies which assessed calibration and discrimination of general and customized SAPS 3 equations. Additionally, we decided to evaluate the correlation between trial size (number of included patients) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics value of the SAPS 3 models. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included. Of these, 11 studies (42.8%) did not find statistically significant mis-calibration for the SAPS 3 general equation. There was a positive correlation between number of included patients and higher H-L statistics, that is, a statistically significant mis-calibration of the model (r = 0.747, P <0.001). Customized equations for major geographic regions did not have statistically significant departures from perfect calibration in 9 of 19 studies. Five studies (17.9%) developed a regional customization and in all of them this new model was not statistically different from a perfect calibration for their populations. Discrimination was at least very good in 24 studies (85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant departure from perfect calibration for the SAPS 3 general equation was common in validation studies and was correlated with larger studies, as should be expected, since H-L statistics (both C and H) are strongly dependent on sample size This finding was also present when major geographic customized equations were evaluated. Local customizations, on the other hand, improved SAPS 3 calibration. Discrimination was almost always very good or excellent, which gives excellent perspectives for local customization when a precise local estimate is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4230997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42309972014-11-14 Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies Nassar, Antonio Paulo Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sa Moreno, Rui Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) was the first critical care prognostic model developed from worldwide data. We aimed to systematically review studies that assessed the prognostic performance of SAPS 3 general and customized models for predicting hospital mortality in adult patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Medline, Lilacs, Scielo and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies which assessed calibration and discrimination of general and customized SAPS 3 equations. Additionally, we decided to evaluate the correlation between trial size (number of included patients) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics value of the SAPS 3 models. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included. Of these, 11 studies (42.8%) did not find statistically significant mis-calibration for the SAPS 3 general equation. There was a positive correlation between number of included patients and higher H-L statistics, that is, a statistically significant mis-calibration of the model (r = 0.747, P <0.001). Customized equations for major geographic regions did not have statistically significant departures from perfect calibration in 9 of 19 studies. Five studies (17.9%) developed a regional customization and in all of them this new model was not statistically different from a perfect calibration for their populations. Discrimination was at least very good in 24 studies (85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant departure from perfect calibration for the SAPS 3 general equation was common in validation studies and was correlated with larger studies, as should be expected, since H-L statistics (both C and H) are strongly dependent on sample size This finding was also present when major geographic customized equations were evaluated. Local customizations, on the other hand, improved SAPS 3 calibration. Discrimination was almost always very good or excellent, which gives excellent perspectives for local customization when a precise local estimate is needed. BioMed Central 2014 2014-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4230997/ /pubmed/24906651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13911 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nassar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Nassar, Antonio Paulo Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sa Moreno, Rui Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title | Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title_full | Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title_short | Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
title_sort | evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4230997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24906651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassarantoniopaulo evaluationofsimplifiedacutephysiologyscore3performanceasystematicreviewofexternalvalidationstudies AT malbouissonluizmarcelosa evaluationofsimplifiedacutephysiologyscore3performanceasystematicreviewofexternalvalidationstudies AT morenorui evaluationofsimplifiedacutephysiologyscore3performanceasystematicreviewofexternalvalidationstudies |