Cargando…

Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods

OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) can help differentiate between central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and Glioblastoma (GBM). However, overlap between ADCs for GBM and lymphoma have been reported because of various region of interest (ROI) methods. Our aim is to explore ROI method to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Sung Jun, Shin, Hyun Joo, Chang, Jong-Hee, Lee, Seung-Koo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112948
_version_ 1782344383376392192
author Ahn, Sung Jun
Shin, Hyun Joo
Chang, Jong-Hee
Lee, Seung-Koo
author_facet Ahn, Sung Jun
Shin, Hyun Joo
Chang, Jong-Hee
Lee, Seung-Koo
author_sort Ahn, Sung Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) can help differentiate between central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and Glioblastoma (GBM). However, overlap between ADCs for GBM and lymphoma have been reported because of various region of interest (ROI) methods. Our aim is to explore ROI method to provide the most reproducible results for differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 25 CNS lymphomas and 62 GBMs with three ROI methods: (1) ROI(1), whole tumor volume; (2) ROI(2), multiple ROIs; and (3) ROI(3), a single ROI. Interobserver variability of two readers for each method was analyzed by intraclass correlation(ICC). ADCs were compared between GBM and lymphoma, using two-sample t-test. The discriminative ability was determined by ROC analysis. RESULTS: ADCs from ROI(1) showed most reproducible results (ICC >0.9). For ROI(1), ADC(mean) for lymphoma showed significantly lower values than GBM (p = 0.03). The optimal cut-off value was 0.98×10(−3) mm(2)/s with 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity. For ROI(2), ADC(min) for lymphoma was significantly lower than GBM (p = 0.02). The cut-off value was 0.69×10(−3) mm(2)/s with 87% sensitivity and 88% specificity. CONCLUSION: ADC values were significantly dependent on ROI method. ADCs from the whole tumor volume had the most reproducible results. ADC(mean) from the whole tumor volume may aid in differentiating between lymphoma and GBM. However, multi-modal imaging approaches are recommended than ADC alone for differentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4231099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42310992014-11-18 Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods Ahn, Sung Jun Shin, Hyun Joo Chang, Jong-Hee Lee, Seung-Koo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) can help differentiate between central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and Glioblastoma (GBM). However, overlap between ADCs for GBM and lymphoma have been reported because of various region of interest (ROI) methods. Our aim is to explore ROI method to provide the most reproducible results for differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 25 CNS lymphomas and 62 GBMs with three ROI methods: (1) ROI(1), whole tumor volume; (2) ROI(2), multiple ROIs; and (3) ROI(3), a single ROI. Interobserver variability of two readers for each method was analyzed by intraclass correlation(ICC). ADCs were compared between GBM and lymphoma, using two-sample t-test. The discriminative ability was determined by ROC analysis. RESULTS: ADCs from ROI(1) showed most reproducible results (ICC >0.9). For ROI(1), ADC(mean) for lymphoma showed significantly lower values than GBM (p = 0.03). The optimal cut-off value was 0.98×10(−3) mm(2)/s with 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity. For ROI(2), ADC(min) for lymphoma was significantly lower than GBM (p = 0.02). The cut-off value was 0.69×10(−3) mm(2)/s with 87% sensitivity and 88% specificity. CONCLUSION: ADC values were significantly dependent on ROI method. ADCs from the whole tumor volume had the most reproducible results. ADC(mean) from the whole tumor volume may aid in differentiating between lymphoma and GBM. However, multi-modal imaging approaches are recommended than ADC alone for differentiation. Public Library of Science 2014-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4231099/ /pubmed/25393543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112948 Text en © 2014 Ahn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahn, Sung Jun
Shin, Hyun Joo
Chang, Jong-Hee
Lee, Seung-Koo
Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title_full Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title_fullStr Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title_short Differentiation between Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Comparison of Three Different ROI Methods
title_sort differentiation between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma using the apparent diffusion coefficient: comparison of three different roi methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112948
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnsungjun differentiationbetweenprimarycerebrallymphomaandglioblastomausingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficientcomparisonofthreedifferentroimethods
AT shinhyunjoo differentiationbetweenprimarycerebrallymphomaandglioblastomausingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficientcomparisonofthreedifferentroimethods
AT changjonghee differentiationbetweenprimarycerebrallymphomaandglioblastomausingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficientcomparisonofthreedifferentroimethods
AT leeseungkoo differentiationbetweenprimarycerebrallymphomaandglioblastomausingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficientcomparisonofthreedifferentroimethods