Cargando…
Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients
BACKGROUND: Current coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessments inadequately assess intermediate‐risk patients, leaving many undertreated and vulnerable to heart attacks. A novel CHD risk‐assessment (CHDRA) tool was developed for intermediate‐risk stratification using biomarkers and established ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22185 |
_version_ | 1782344405030535168 |
---|---|
author | Solomon, Matthew D. Tirupsur, Ahalya Hytopoulos, Evangelos Beggs, Michael Harrington, Douglas S. French, Cynthia Quertermous, Thomas |
author_facet | Solomon, Matthew D. Tirupsur, Ahalya Hytopoulos, Evangelos Beggs, Michael Harrington, Douglas S. French, Cynthia Quertermous, Thomas |
author_sort | Solomon, Matthew D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessments inadequately assess intermediate‐risk patients, leaving many undertreated and vulnerable to heart attacks. A novel CHD risk‐assessment (CHDRA) tool was developed for intermediate‐risk stratification using biomarkers and established risk factors to significantly improve CHD risk discrimination. HYPOTHESIS: Physicians will change their treatment plan in response to more information about a patient's CHD risk level provided by the CHDRA test. METHODS: A Web‐based survey of cardiology, internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology physicians (n = 206) was conducted to assess the CHDRA clinical impact. Each physician was shown 3 clinical vignettes representing community‐based cohort participants randomly selected from 8 total vignettes. For each, the physicians assessed the individual's CHD risk and selected preferred therapies based on the individual's comorbidities, physical examination, and laboratory results. The individual's CHDRA score was then provided and the physicians were queried for changes to their initial treatment plans. RESULTS: After obtaining the CHDRA result, 70% of the physician responses indicated a change to the patient's treatment plan. The revised lipid‐management plans agreed more often (74.6% of the time) with the current Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines than did the original plans (57.6% of the time). Most physicians (71.3%) agreed with the statement that the CHDRA result provided information that would impact their current treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The CHDRA test provided additional information to which physicians responded by more often applying appropriate therapy and actions aligned with guidelines, thus demonstrating the clinical utility of the test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4231217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42312172014-12-15 Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients Solomon, Matthew D. Tirupsur, Ahalya Hytopoulos, Evangelos Beggs, Michael Harrington, Douglas S. French, Cynthia Quertermous, Thomas Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Current coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessments inadequately assess intermediate‐risk patients, leaving many undertreated and vulnerable to heart attacks. A novel CHD risk‐assessment (CHDRA) tool was developed for intermediate‐risk stratification using biomarkers and established risk factors to significantly improve CHD risk discrimination. HYPOTHESIS: Physicians will change their treatment plan in response to more information about a patient's CHD risk level provided by the CHDRA test. METHODS: A Web‐based survey of cardiology, internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology physicians (n = 206) was conducted to assess the CHDRA clinical impact. Each physician was shown 3 clinical vignettes representing community‐based cohort participants randomly selected from 8 total vignettes. For each, the physicians assessed the individual's CHD risk and selected preferred therapies based on the individual's comorbidities, physical examination, and laboratory results. The individual's CHDRA score was then provided and the physicians were queried for changes to their initial treatment plans. RESULTS: After obtaining the CHDRA result, 70% of the physician responses indicated a change to the patient's treatment plan. The revised lipid‐management plans agreed more often (74.6% of the time) with the current Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines than did the original plans (57.6% of the time). Most physicians (71.3%) agreed with the statement that the CHDRA result provided information that would impact their current treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The CHDRA test provided additional information to which physicians responded by more often applying appropriate therapy and actions aligned with guidelines, thus demonstrating the clinical utility of the test. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2013-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4231217/ /pubmed/23929798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22185 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Solomon, Matthew D. Tirupsur, Ahalya Hytopoulos, Evangelos Beggs, Michael Harrington, Douglas S. French, Cynthia Quertermous, Thomas Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title | Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title_full | Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title_fullStr | Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title_short | Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk‐Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate‐Risk Patients |
title_sort | clinical utility of a novel coronary heart disease risk‐assessment test to further classify intermediate‐risk patients |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solomonmatthewd clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT tirupsurahalya clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT hytopoulosevangelos clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT beggsmichael clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT harringtondouglass clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT frenchcynthia clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients AT quertermousthomas clinicalutilityofanovelcoronaryheartdiseaseriskassessmenttesttofurtherclassifyintermediateriskpatients |