Cargando…

Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts

Kinetic energy non-lethal projectiles are used to impart sufficient effect onto a person in order to deter uncivil or hazardous behavior with a low probability of permanent injury. Since their first use, real cases indicate that the injuries inflicted by such projectiles may be irreversible and some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oukara, Amar, Nsiampa, Nestor, Robbe, Cyril, Papy, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400712
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010075
_version_ 1782344436696481792
author Oukara, Amar
Nsiampa, Nestor
Robbe, Cyril
Papy, Alexandre
author_facet Oukara, Amar
Nsiampa, Nestor
Robbe, Cyril
Papy, Alexandre
author_sort Oukara, Amar
collection PubMed
description Kinetic energy non-lethal projectiles are used to impart sufficient effect onto a person in order to deter uncivil or hazardous behavior with a low probability of permanent injury. Since their first use, real cases indicate that the injuries inflicted by such projectiles may be irreversible and sometimes lead to death, especially for the head impacts. Given the high velocities and the low masses involved in such impacts, the assessment approaches proposed in automotive crash tests and sports may not be appropriate. Therefore, there is a need of a specific approach to assess the lethality of these projectiles. In this framework, some recent research data referred in this article as “force wall approach” suggest the use of three lesional thresholds (unconsciousness, meningeal damages and bone damages) that depend on the intracranial pressure. Three corresponding critical impact forces are determined for a reference projectile. Based on the principle that equal rigid wall maximal impact forces will produce equal damage on the head, these limits can be determined for any other projectile. In order to validate the consistence of this innovative method, it is necessary to compare the results with other existing assessment methods. This paper proposes a comparison between the “force wall approach” and two different head models. The first one is a numerical model (Strasbourg University Finite Element Head Model-SUFEHM) from Strasbourg University; the second one is a mechanical surrogate (Ballistics Load Sensing Headform-BLSH) from Biokinetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4231376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42313762014-11-14 Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts Oukara, Amar Nsiampa, Nestor Robbe, Cyril Papy, Alexandre Open Biomed Eng J Article Kinetic energy non-lethal projectiles are used to impart sufficient effect onto a person in order to deter uncivil or hazardous behavior with a low probability of permanent injury. Since their first use, real cases indicate that the injuries inflicted by such projectiles may be irreversible and sometimes lead to death, especially for the head impacts. Given the high velocities and the low masses involved in such impacts, the assessment approaches proposed in automotive crash tests and sports may not be appropriate. Therefore, there is a need of a specific approach to assess the lethality of these projectiles. In this framework, some recent research data referred in this article as “force wall approach” suggest the use of three lesional thresholds (unconsciousness, meningeal damages and bone damages) that depend on the intracranial pressure. Three corresponding critical impact forces are determined for a reference projectile. Based on the principle that equal rigid wall maximal impact forces will produce equal damage on the head, these limits can be determined for any other projectile. In order to validate the consistence of this innovative method, it is necessary to compare the results with other existing assessment methods. This paper proposes a comparison between the “force wall approach” and two different head models. The first one is a numerical model (Strasbourg University Finite Element Head Model-SUFEHM) from Strasbourg University; the second one is a mechanical surrogate (Ballistics Load Sensing Headform-BLSH) from Biokinetics. Bentham Open 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4231376/ /pubmed/25400712 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010075 Text en © Oukara et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Oukara, Amar
Nsiampa, Nestor
Robbe, Cyril
Papy, Alexandre
Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title_full Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title_fullStr Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title_full_unstemmed Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title_short Injury Risk Assessment of Non-Lethal Projectile Head Impacts
title_sort injury risk assessment of non-lethal projectile head impacts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400712
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010075
work_keys_str_mv AT oukaraamar injuryriskassessmentofnonlethalprojectileheadimpacts
AT nsiampanestor injuryriskassessmentofnonlethalprojectileheadimpacts
AT robbecyril injuryriskassessmentofnonlethalprojectileheadimpacts
AT papyalexandre injuryriskassessmentofnonlethalprojectileheadimpacts