Cargando…
Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215 |
_version_ | 1782344459873157120 |
---|---|
author | Brodersen, Jakob Seehausen, Ole |
author_facet | Brodersen, Jakob Seehausen, Ole |
author_sort | Brodersen, Jakob |
collection | PubMed |
description | While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is important to understand evolutionary dynamics is only rarely integrated. As a consequence, monitoring programs often fail to detect changes in these key components of biodiversity until after major loss of diversity has occurred. The extensive efforts in ecological monitoring have generated large data sets of unique value to macro-scale and long-term ecological research, but the insights gained from such data sets could be multiplied by the inclusion of evolutionary biological approaches. We argue that the lack of process-based evolutionary thinking in ecological monitoring means a significant loss of opportunity for research and conservation. Assessment of genetic and phenotypic variation within and between species needs to be fully integrated to safeguard biodiversity and the ecological and evolutionary dynamics in natural ecosystems. We illustrate our case with examples from fishes and conclude with examples of ongoing monitoring programs and provide suggestions on how to improve future quantitative diversity surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4231589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42315892014-12-31 Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs Brodersen, Jakob Seehausen, Ole Evol Appl Reviews and Syntheses While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is important to understand evolutionary dynamics is only rarely integrated. As a consequence, monitoring programs often fail to detect changes in these key components of biodiversity until after major loss of diversity has occurred. The extensive efforts in ecological monitoring have generated large data sets of unique value to macro-scale and long-term ecological research, but the insights gained from such data sets could be multiplied by the inclusion of evolutionary biological approaches. We argue that the lack of process-based evolutionary thinking in ecological monitoring means a significant loss of opportunity for research and conservation. Assessment of genetic and phenotypic variation within and between species needs to be fully integrated to safeguard biodiversity and the ecological and evolutionary dynamics in natural ecosystems. We illustrate our case with examples from fishes and conclude with examples of ongoing monitoring programs and provide suggestions on how to improve future quantitative diversity surveys. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4231589/ /pubmed/25553061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215 Text en © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews and Syntheses Brodersen, Jakob Seehausen, Ole Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title | Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title_full | Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title_fullStr | Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title_full_unstemmed | Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title_short | Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
title_sort | why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs |
topic | Reviews and Syntheses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brodersenjakob whyevolutionarybiologistsshouldgetseriouslyinvolvedinecologicalmonitoringandappliedbiodiversityassessmentprograms AT seehausenole whyevolutionarybiologistsshouldgetseriouslyinvolvedinecologicalmonitoringandappliedbiodiversityassessmentprograms |