Cargando…

Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs

While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodersen, Jakob, Seehausen, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215
_version_ 1782344459873157120
author Brodersen, Jakob
Seehausen, Ole
author_facet Brodersen, Jakob
Seehausen, Ole
author_sort Brodersen, Jakob
collection PubMed
description While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is important to understand evolutionary dynamics is only rarely integrated. As a consequence, monitoring programs often fail to detect changes in these key components of biodiversity until after major loss of diversity has occurred. The extensive efforts in ecological monitoring have generated large data sets of unique value to macro-scale and long-term ecological research, but the insights gained from such data sets could be multiplied by the inclusion of evolutionary biological approaches. We argue that the lack of process-based evolutionary thinking in ecological monitoring means a significant loss of opportunity for research and conservation. Assessment of genetic and phenotypic variation within and between species needs to be fully integrated to safeguard biodiversity and the ecological and evolutionary dynamics in natural ecosystems. We illustrate our case with examples from fishes and conclude with examples of ongoing monitoring programs and provide suggestions on how to improve future quantitative diversity surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4231589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42315892014-12-31 Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs Brodersen, Jakob Seehausen, Ole Evol Appl Reviews and Syntheses While ecological monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs are widely implemented and relatively well developed to survey and monitor the structure and dynamics of populations and communities in many ecosystems, quantitative assessment and monitoring of genetic and phenotypic diversity that is important to understand evolutionary dynamics is only rarely integrated. As a consequence, monitoring programs often fail to detect changes in these key components of biodiversity until after major loss of diversity has occurred. The extensive efforts in ecological monitoring have generated large data sets of unique value to macro-scale and long-term ecological research, but the insights gained from such data sets could be multiplied by the inclusion of evolutionary biological approaches. We argue that the lack of process-based evolutionary thinking in ecological monitoring means a significant loss of opportunity for research and conservation. Assessment of genetic and phenotypic variation within and between species needs to be fully integrated to safeguard biodiversity and the ecological and evolutionary dynamics in natural ecosystems. We illustrate our case with examples from fishes and conclude with examples of ongoing monitoring programs and provide suggestions on how to improve future quantitative diversity surveys. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4231589/ /pubmed/25553061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215 Text en © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews and Syntheses
Brodersen, Jakob
Seehausen, Ole
Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title_full Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title_fullStr Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title_full_unstemmed Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title_short Why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
title_sort why evolutionary biologists should get seriously involved in ecological monitoring and applied biodiversity assessment programs
topic Reviews and Syntheses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12215
work_keys_str_mv AT brodersenjakob whyevolutionarybiologistsshouldgetseriouslyinvolvedinecologicalmonitoringandappliedbiodiversityassessmentprograms
AT seehausenole whyevolutionarybiologistsshouldgetseriouslyinvolvedinecologicalmonitoringandappliedbiodiversityassessmentprograms