Cargando…

Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores

We tested the hypothesis that Arabidopsis can recognize and respond differentially to insect species at the transcriptional level using a genome wide microarray. Transcriptional reprogramming was characterized using co-expression analysis in damaged and undamaged leaves at two times in response to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appel, Heidi M., Fescemyer, Howard, Ehlting, Juergen, Weston, David, Rehrig, Erin, Joshi, Trupti, Xu, Dong, Bohlmann, Joerg, Schultz, Jack
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00565
_version_ 1782344487922565120
author Appel, Heidi M.
Fescemyer, Howard
Ehlting, Juergen
Weston, David
Rehrig, Erin
Joshi, Trupti
Xu, Dong
Bohlmann, Joerg
Schultz, Jack
author_facet Appel, Heidi M.
Fescemyer, Howard
Ehlting, Juergen
Weston, David
Rehrig, Erin
Joshi, Trupti
Xu, Dong
Bohlmann, Joerg
Schultz, Jack
author_sort Appel, Heidi M.
collection PubMed
description We tested the hypothesis that Arabidopsis can recognize and respond differentially to insect species at the transcriptional level using a genome wide microarray. Transcriptional reprogramming was characterized using co-expression analysis in damaged and undamaged leaves at two times in response to mechanical wounding and four insect species. In all, 2778 (10.6%) of annotated genes on the array were differentially expressed in at least one treatment. Responses differed mainly between aphid and caterpillar and sampling times. Responses to aphids and caterpillars shared only 10% of up-regulated and 8% of down-regulated genes. Responses to two caterpillars shared 21 and 12% of up- and down-regulated genes, whereas responses to the two aphids shared only 7 and 4% of up-regulated and down-regulated genes. Overlap in genes expressed between 6 and 24 h was 3–15%, and depended on the insect species. Responses in attacked and unattacked leaves differed at 6 h but converged by 24 h. Genes responding to the insects are also responsive to many stressors and included primary metabolism. Aphids down-regulated amino acid catabolism; caterpillars stimulated production of amino acids involved in glucosinolate synthesis. Co-expression analysis revealed 17 response networks. Transcription factors were a major portion of differentially expressed genes throughout and responsive genes shared most of the known or postulated binding sites. However, cis-element composition of genes down regulated by the aphid M. persicae was unique, as were those of genes down-regulated by caterpillars. As many as 20 cis-elements were over-represented in one or more treatments, including some from well-characterized classes and others as yet uncharacterized. We suggest that transcriptional changes elicited by wounding and insects are heavily influenced by transcription factors and involve both enrichment of a common set of cis-elements and a unique enrichment of a few cis-elements in responding genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4231836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42318362014-12-01 Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores Appel, Heidi M. Fescemyer, Howard Ehlting, Juergen Weston, David Rehrig, Erin Joshi, Trupti Xu, Dong Bohlmann, Joerg Schultz, Jack Front Plant Sci Plant Science We tested the hypothesis that Arabidopsis can recognize and respond differentially to insect species at the transcriptional level using a genome wide microarray. Transcriptional reprogramming was characterized using co-expression analysis in damaged and undamaged leaves at two times in response to mechanical wounding and four insect species. In all, 2778 (10.6%) of annotated genes on the array were differentially expressed in at least one treatment. Responses differed mainly between aphid and caterpillar and sampling times. Responses to aphids and caterpillars shared only 10% of up-regulated and 8% of down-regulated genes. Responses to two caterpillars shared 21 and 12% of up- and down-regulated genes, whereas responses to the two aphids shared only 7 and 4% of up-regulated and down-regulated genes. Overlap in genes expressed between 6 and 24 h was 3–15%, and depended on the insect species. Responses in attacked and unattacked leaves differed at 6 h but converged by 24 h. Genes responding to the insects are also responsive to many stressors and included primary metabolism. Aphids down-regulated amino acid catabolism; caterpillars stimulated production of amino acids involved in glucosinolate synthesis. Co-expression analysis revealed 17 response networks. Transcription factors were a major portion of differentially expressed genes throughout and responsive genes shared most of the known or postulated binding sites. However, cis-element composition of genes down regulated by the aphid M. persicae was unique, as were those of genes down-regulated by caterpillars. As many as 20 cis-elements were over-represented in one or more treatments, including some from well-characterized classes and others as yet uncharacterized. We suggest that transcriptional changes elicited by wounding and insects are heavily influenced by transcription factors and involve both enrichment of a common set of cis-elements and a unique enrichment of a few cis-elements in responding genes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4231836/ /pubmed/25452759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00565 Text en Copyright © 2014 Appel, Fescemyer, Ehlting, Weston, Rehrig, Joshi, Xu, Bohlmann and Schultz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Appel, Heidi M.
Fescemyer, Howard
Ehlting, Juergen
Weston, David
Rehrig, Erin
Joshi, Trupti
Xu, Dong
Bohlmann, Joerg
Schultz, Jack
Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title_full Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title_fullStr Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title_short Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
title_sort transcriptional responses of arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00565
work_keys_str_mv AT appelheidim transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT fescemyerhoward transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT ehltingjuergen transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT westondavid transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT rehrigerin transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT joshitrupti transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT xudong transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT bohlmannjoerg transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores
AT schultzjack transcriptionalresponsesofarabidopsisthalianatochewingandsuckinginsectherbivores