Cargando…

Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening

BACKGROUND: The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was developed to examine the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on physical and psychological functioning from a patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: To determine the responder definition (RD) of the MSIS-29 physical impact subscale (PHYS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Glenn A, Wyrwich, Kathleen W, Guo, Shien, Medori, Rossella, Altincatal, Arman, Wagner, Linda, Elkins, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24740371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458514530489
_version_ 1782344547524673536
author Phillips, Glenn A
Wyrwich, Kathleen W
Guo, Shien
Medori, Rossella
Altincatal, Arman
Wagner, Linda
Elkins, Jacob
author_facet Phillips, Glenn A
Wyrwich, Kathleen W
Guo, Shien
Medori, Rossella
Altincatal, Arman
Wagner, Linda
Elkins, Jacob
author_sort Phillips, Glenn A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was developed to examine the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on physical and psychological functioning from a patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: To determine the responder definition (RD) of the MSIS-29 physical impact subscale (PHYS) in a group of patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) participating in a clinical trial. METHODS: Data from the SELECT trial comparing daclizumab high-yield process with placebo in patients with RRMS were used. Physical function was evaluated in SELECT using three patient-reported outcomes measures and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to identify an RD for the MSIS-29. RESULTS: Results across the anchor-based approach suggested MSIS-29 PHYS RD values of 6.91 (mean), 7.14 (median) and 7.50 (mode). Distribution-based RD estimates ranged from 6.24 to 10.40. An RD of 7.50 was selected as the most appropriate threshold for physical worsening based on corresponding changes in the EDSS (primary anchor of interest). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that a ≥7.50 point worsening on the MSIS-29 PHYS is a reasonable and practical threshold for identifying patients with RRMS who have experienced a clinically significant change in the physical impact of MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4232315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42323152014-11-20 Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening Phillips, Glenn A Wyrwich, Kathleen W Guo, Shien Medori, Rossella Altincatal, Arman Wagner, Linda Elkins, Jacob Mult Scler Research Papers BACKGROUND: The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was developed to examine the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on physical and psychological functioning from a patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: To determine the responder definition (RD) of the MSIS-29 physical impact subscale (PHYS) in a group of patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) participating in a clinical trial. METHODS: Data from the SELECT trial comparing daclizumab high-yield process with placebo in patients with RRMS were used. Physical function was evaluated in SELECT using three patient-reported outcomes measures and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to identify an RD for the MSIS-29. RESULTS: Results across the anchor-based approach suggested MSIS-29 PHYS RD values of 6.91 (mean), 7.14 (median) and 7.50 (mode). Distribution-based RD estimates ranged from 6.24 to 10.40. An RD of 7.50 was selected as the most appropriate threshold for physical worsening based on corresponding changes in the EDSS (primary anchor of interest). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that a ≥7.50 point worsening on the MSIS-29 PHYS is a reasonable and practical threshold for identifying patients with RRMS who have experienced a clinically significant change in the physical impact of MS. SAGE Publications 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4232315/ /pubmed/24740371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458514530489 Text en © The Author(s), 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Research Papers
Phillips, Glenn A
Wyrwich, Kathleen W
Guo, Shien
Medori, Rossella
Altincatal, Arman
Wagner, Linda
Elkins, Jacob
Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title_full Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title_fullStr Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title_full_unstemmed Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title_short Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
title_sort responder definition of the multiple sclerosis impact scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24740371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458514530489
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsglenna responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT wyrwichkathleenw responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT guoshien responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT medorirossella responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT altincatalarman responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT wagnerlinda responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening
AT elkinsjacob responderdefinitionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscalephysicalimpactsubscaleforpatientswithphysicalworsening