Cargando…

Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value

Given that funds for biodiversity conservation are limited, there is a need to understand people’s preferences for its different components. To date, such preferences have largely been measured in monetary terms. However, how people value biodiversity may differ from economic theory, and there is li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DALLIMER, MARTIN, TINCH, DUGALD, HANLEY, NICK, IRVINE, KATHERINE N, ROUQUETTE, JAMES R, WARREN, PHILIP H, MALTBY, LORRAINE, GASTON, KEVIN J, ARMSWORTH, PAUL R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24372643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12215
_version_ 1782344653265174528
author DALLIMER, MARTIN
TINCH, DUGALD
HANLEY, NICK
IRVINE, KATHERINE N
ROUQUETTE, JAMES R
WARREN, PHILIP H
MALTBY, LORRAINE
GASTON, KEVIN J
ARMSWORTH, PAUL R
author_facet DALLIMER, MARTIN
TINCH, DUGALD
HANLEY, NICK
IRVINE, KATHERINE N
ROUQUETTE, JAMES R
WARREN, PHILIP H
MALTBY, LORRAINE
GASTON, KEVIN J
ARMSWORTH, PAUL R
author_sort DALLIMER, MARTIN
collection PubMed
description Given that funds for biodiversity conservation are limited, there is a need to understand people’s preferences for its different components. To date, such preferences have largely been measured in monetary terms. However, how people value biodiversity may differ from economic theory, and there is little consensus over whether monetary metrics are always appropriate or the degree to which other methods offer alternative and complementary perspectives on value. We used a choice experiment to compare monetary amounts recreational visitors to urban green spaces were willing to pay for biodiversity enhancement (increases in species richness for birds, plants, and aquatic macroinvertebrates) with self-reported psychological gains in well-being derived from visiting the same sites. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates were significant and positive, and respondents reported high gains in well-being across 3 axes derived from environmental psychology theories (reflection, attachment, continuity with past). The 2 metrics were broadly congruent. Participants with above-median self-reported well-being scores were willing to pay significantly higher amounts for enhancing species richness than those with below-median scores, regardless of taxon. The socio-economic and demographic background of participants played little role in determining either their well-being or the probability of choosing a paying option within the choice experiment. Site-level environmental characteristics were only somewhat related to WTP, but showed strong associations with self-reported well-being. Both approaches are likely to reflect a combination of the environmental properties of a site and unobserved individual preference heterogeneity for the natural world. Our results suggest that either metric will deliver mutually consistent results in an assessment of environmental preferences, although which approach is preferable depends on why one wishes to measure values for the natural world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4232860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42328602014-12-31 Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value DALLIMER, MARTIN TINCH, DUGALD HANLEY, NICK IRVINE, KATHERINE N ROUQUETTE, JAMES R WARREN, PHILIP H MALTBY, LORRAINE GASTON, KEVIN J ARMSWORTH, PAUL R Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Given that funds for biodiversity conservation are limited, there is a need to understand people’s preferences for its different components. To date, such preferences have largely been measured in monetary terms. However, how people value biodiversity may differ from economic theory, and there is little consensus over whether monetary metrics are always appropriate or the degree to which other methods offer alternative and complementary perspectives on value. We used a choice experiment to compare monetary amounts recreational visitors to urban green spaces were willing to pay for biodiversity enhancement (increases in species richness for birds, plants, and aquatic macroinvertebrates) with self-reported psychological gains in well-being derived from visiting the same sites. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates were significant and positive, and respondents reported high gains in well-being across 3 axes derived from environmental psychology theories (reflection, attachment, continuity with past). The 2 metrics were broadly congruent. Participants with above-median self-reported well-being scores were willing to pay significantly higher amounts for enhancing species richness than those with below-median scores, regardless of taxon. The socio-economic and demographic background of participants played little role in determining either their well-being or the probability of choosing a paying option within the choice experiment. Site-level environmental characteristics were only somewhat related to WTP, but showed strong associations with self-reported well-being. Both approaches are likely to reflect a combination of the environmental properties of a site and unobserved individual preference heterogeneity for the natural world. Our results suggest that either metric will deliver mutually consistent results in an assessment of environmental preferences, although which approach is preferable depends on why one wishes to measure values for the natural world. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-01 2014-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4232860/ /pubmed/24372643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12215 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the Society for Conservation Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
DALLIMER, MARTIN
TINCH, DUGALD
HANLEY, NICK
IRVINE, KATHERINE N
ROUQUETTE, JAMES R
WARREN, PHILIP H
MALTBY, LORRAINE
GASTON, KEVIN J
ARMSWORTH, PAUL R
Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title_full Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title_fullStr Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title_short Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value
title_sort quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24372643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12215
work_keys_str_mv AT dallimermartin quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT tinchdugald quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT hanleynick quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT irvinekatherinen quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT rouquettejamesr quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT warrenphiliph quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT maltbylorraine quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT gastonkevinj quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue
AT armsworthpaulr quantifyingpreferencesforthenaturalworldusingmonetaryandnonmonetaryassessmentsofvalue