Cargando…

Research: Care Delivery Development and validation of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire-Short Form

AIMS: To develop and validate a short form of the 54-item Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire that maintains the domains and performance characteristics of the long-form questionnaire. METHODS: Data from the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire validation study were analysed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peyrot, M, Xu, Y, Rubin, R R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.12453
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To develop and validate a short form of the 54-item Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire that maintains the domains and performance characteristics of the long-form questionnaire. METHODS: Data from the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire validation study were analysed to select items representing the nine scales (convenience, negative events, interference, self-monitoring of blood glucose burden, efficacy, social burden, psychological well-being, treatment satisfaction and treatment preference). The resulting 20-item Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form was administered online, with validated criterion measures of treatment satisfaction and medication adherence, with a retest within 2 weeks. Participants were US adults (N = 413) with Type 2 diabetes using oral agents alone; insulin by syringe and/or pen with or without oral agents; or glucagon-like peptide-1 agents. Most participants (82%) completed the retest. RESULTS: The median inter-item agreement of scales was 0.76 and the total composite (mean of all items except treatment preference) was 0.88. The median test-retest reliability of scales was 0.86, and of the total composite was 0.95. All statistically significant correlations between Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales and criterion measures of treatment satisfaction and adherence were in the expected direction. The median correlation of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form with corresponding criterion measures of treatment satisfaction was 0.59; the mean correlation of the same Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form measures with adherence was 0.42. The Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales were more powerful predictors of adherence than were the criterion measures of treatment satisfaction. The Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales differentiated between those taking different medications and between those using different insulin delivery devices. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form provides a comprehensive set of measures with acceptable reliability and validity and a reduced burden of administration. WHAT’S NEW? 1. This study reports the development and validation of a short form of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire (DMSRQ) that maintains the domains and performance of the long-form questionnaire. 2. Like the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire, the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire-Short Form (DMSRQ-SF) has good reliability and enhanced validity relative to other comparable measures. 3. The DMSRQ-SF has a lower burden of administration than the DMSRQ, which makes it suitable for use in clinical settings as well as research. 4. Each of the DMSRQ-SF therapy perception items was chosen to have unique validity and applicability as a single-item measure, i.e. to assess an independent aspect of treatment satisfaction that discriminates treatments and drives global assessments of treatments.