Cargando…

A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development

BACKGROUND: Mouse mutants are used to model human congenital cardiovascular disease. Little is published comparing normal cardiovascular development in mice versus humans. We carried out a systematic comparative analysis of mouse and human fetal cardiovascular development. METHODS: Episcopic fluores...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnan, Anita, Samtani, Rajeev, Dhanantwari, Preeta, Lee, Elaine, Yamada, Shigehito, Shiota, Kohei, Donofrio, Mary T., Leatherbury, Linda, Lo, Cecilia W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.128
_version_ 1782344671512494080
author Krishnan, Anita
Samtani, Rajeev
Dhanantwari, Preeta
Lee, Elaine
Yamada, Shigehito
Shiota, Kohei
Donofrio, Mary T.
Leatherbury, Linda
Lo, Cecilia W.
author_facet Krishnan, Anita
Samtani, Rajeev
Dhanantwari, Preeta
Lee, Elaine
Yamada, Shigehito
Shiota, Kohei
Donofrio, Mary T.
Leatherbury, Linda
Lo, Cecilia W.
author_sort Krishnan, Anita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mouse mutants are used to model human congenital cardiovascular disease. Little is published comparing normal cardiovascular development in mice versus humans. We carried out a systematic comparative analysis of mouse and human fetal cardiovascular development. METHODS: Episcopic fluorescence image capture (EFIC) was performed on 66 wild type mouse embryos from embryonic day (E) 9.5-birth; 2D and 3D datasets were compared with EFIC and magnetic resonance images (MRI) from a study of 52 human fetuses (Carnegie Stage (CS) 13–23). RESULTS: Time course of atrial, ventricular and outflow septation were outlined, and followed a similar sequence in both species. Bilateral vena cavae and prominent atrial appendages were seen in the mouse fetus; in human fetuses, atrial appendages were small, and a single right superior vena cava was present. In contrast to humans with separate pulmonary vein orifices, a pulmonary venous confluence with one orifice enters the left atrium in mice. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac developmental sequences observed in mouse and human fetuses are comparable, with minor differences in atrial and venous morphology. These comparisons of mouse and human cardiac development strongly support that mouse morphogenesis is a good model for human development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4233008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42330082015-06-01 A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development Krishnan, Anita Samtani, Rajeev Dhanantwari, Preeta Lee, Elaine Yamada, Shigehito Shiota, Kohei Donofrio, Mary T. Leatherbury, Linda Lo, Cecilia W. Pediatr Res Article BACKGROUND: Mouse mutants are used to model human congenital cardiovascular disease. Little is published comparing normal cardiovascular development in mice versus humans. We carried out a systematic comparative analysis of mouse and human fetal cardiovascular development. METHODS: Episcopic fluorescence image capture (EFIC) was performed on 66 wild type mouse embryos from embryonic day (E) 9.5-birth; 2D and 3D datasets were compared with EFIC and magnetic resonance images (MRI) from a study of 52 human fetuses (Carnegie Stage (CS) 13–23). RESULTS: Time course of atrial, ventricular and outflow septation were outlined, and followed a similar sequence in both species. Bilateral vena cavae and prominent atrial appendages were seen in the mouse fetus; in human fetuses, atrial appendages were small, and a single right superior vena cava was present. In contrast to humans with separate pulmonary vein orifices, a pulmonary venous confluence with one orifice enters the left atrium in mice. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac developmental sequences observed in mouse and human fetuses are comparable, with minor differences in atrial and venous morphology. These comparisons of mouse and human cardiac development strongly support that mouse morphogenesis is a good model for human development. 2014-08-28 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4233008/ /pubmed/25167202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.128 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Krishnan, Anita
Samtani, Rajeev
Dhanantwari, Preeta
Lee, Elaine
Yamada, Shigehito
Shiota, Kohei
Donofrio, Mary T.
Leatherbury, Linda
Lo, Cecilia W.
A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title_full A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title_fullStr A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title_full_unstemmed A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title_short A Detailed Comparison of Mouse and Human Cardiac Development
title_sort detailed comparison of mouse and human cardiac development
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.128
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnananita adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT samtanirajeev adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT dhanantwaripreeta adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT leeelaine adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT yamadashigehito adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT shiotakohei adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT donofriomaryt adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT leatherburylinda adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT loceciliaw adetailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT krishnananita detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT samtanirajeev detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT dhanantwaripreeta detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT leeelaine detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT yamadashigehito detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT shiotakohei detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT donofriomaryt detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT leatherburylinda detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment
AT loceciliaw detailedcomparisonofmouseandhumancardiacdevelopment