Cargando…

Prediction of clinical pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze morphology

Background: The selection of blastocyst warmed for transfer is based on pre-freeze morphology in vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles. But, it is controversial which parameter of blastocyst morphology most closely related to the clinical outcomes. Objective: To estimate the effect of b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhang, Huan, Zhou, Ying, Li, Yan, Zheng, Yi, Xiao, Shiquan, Wu, Yonggen, Wang, Haiqing, Huang, Xuefeng
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2014
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408707

Ejemplares similares

Effect of exposed-to-air frequency of cryopreserved embryo on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective analysis of 9,200 vitrified-warmed transfer cycles
por: Zhang, Huan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of blastocyst morphology and developmental speed on transfer strategy for grade “C” blastocyst in vitrified‐warmed cycles
por: He, Yuxia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Associations of post-warming embryo or blastocyst development with clinical pregnancy in vitrified embryo or blastocyst transfer cycles
por: Hong, Yeon Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles
por: Eum, Jin Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Post-warming embryo morphology is associated with live birth: a cohort study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles
por: Allen, Meagan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles
por: Hwang, Ji Young, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Retrospective study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the presence of morphokinetic variables
por: Hur, Yong Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical Usability of Embryo Development Using a Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Approach in a Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer: Assessment of Pre-Vitrified Blastocyst Diameter and Post-Warmed Blastocyst Re-Expansion Speed
por: Park, Jae Kyun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Pre-Vitrification and Post-Warming Variables of Vitrified-Warmed Blastocysts That Are Predictable for Implantation
por: Gabrielsen, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Assisted hatching of vitrified-warmed blastocysts prior to embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy outcomes
por: Ng, Charis, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predicted luteal phase length has no influence on success of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle
por: Reljič, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program
por: Yerushalmi, G. M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
por: Muthukumar, K, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of Day 7 Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome of Singletons Born After Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer
por: Huang, Jiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Post-warming culture of human vitrified blastocysts with prolactin improves trophoblast outgrowth
por: Ezoe, Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfers in ethnic Chinese ART patients
por: Tong, Guo Qing, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Insemination of recipient sows improves the survival to term of vitrified and warmed porcine expanded blastocysts transferred non‐surgically
por: Tajima, Shigeyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The impact of blastomere loss on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of vitrified-warmed Day3 embryos in single embryo transfer cycles
por: Jiang, Shutian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Live birth rates in day 5 fresh versus vitrified single blastocyst transfer cycles: A cross-sectional analysis
por: Kieu, Violet, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fatty acid supplementation into warming solutions improves pregnancy outcomes after single vitrified‐warmed cleavage stage embryo transfers
por: Amagai, Ayumi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction of live birth in vitrified-warmed 1PN-derived blastocyst transfer: Overall quality grade, ICM, TE, and expansion degree
por: Wang, Tiantian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Successful pregnancy following the transfer of vitrified blastocyst which developed from poor quality embryos on day 3
por: Zhang, Xiao-jian, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center
por: Levi Setti, Paolo Emanuele, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed
por: Shen, Xi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Poor Embryo Quality Is Associated With A Higher Risk of Low Birthweight in Vitrified-Warmed Single Embryo Transfer Cycles
por: Huang, Jiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A comparative study of post-warming survival rates and clinical outcomes of human blastocysts vitrified/warmed by CryoTouch and Cryotop methods
por: Keshavarzi, Somayeh, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7
por: Hiraoka, Kenichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Neonatal outcomes after the transfer of vitrified blastocysts: closed versus open vitrification system
por: Chen, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
por: Ramadan, Hadi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
por: Park, Dong Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts
por: Shapiro, Daniel B., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
por: Agha-Rahimi, Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from time interval between a freeze-all cycle and a subsequent frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer
por: Hu, Shiqiao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles
por: Jia, Nan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore™ day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
por: Kato, Keiichi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The pregnancy outcomes of day-5 poor-quality and day-6 high-quality blastocysts in single blastocyst transfer cycles
por: Zhang, Guang-li, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reproductive outcomes of vitrified blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle versus mild hormonally stimulated and artificial protocols: A randomized control trial
por: Sheikhi, Otoufe, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles
por: Hu, Kai-Lun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
por: Zhang, Hui-na, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laser‐assisted hatching on clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing single vitrified Blastocyst transfer: A propensity score–matched study
por: Endo, Yuji, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hh4rq1harc3fu939fqm1ovqbpp