Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction

Introduction: Reported infection rates in breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) can exceed 31%. Prophylactic antibiotics remain controversial due to the absence of evidence-based literature. The purpose of this study was to examine published antibiotic regimens and their associate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Brett T., Bishawi, Muath, Dagum, Alexander B., Bui, Duc T., Khan, Sami U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525481
_version_ 1782344774371508224
author Phillips, Brett T.
Bishawi, Muath
Dagum, Alexander B.
Bui, Duc T.
Khan, Sami U.
author_facet Phillips, Brett T.
Bishawi, Muath
Dagum, Alexander B.
Bui, Duc T.
Khan, Sami U.
author_sort Phillips, Brett T.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Reported infection rates in breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) can exceed 31%. Prophylactic antibiotics remain controversial due to the absence of evidence-based literature. The purpose of this study was to examine published antibiotic regimens and their associated infection rates in this population. Methods: Systematic electronic searches were performed in PubMed, OVID, and the Cochrane databases for studies that reported on prophylactic antibiotic use and infection in patients undergoing ADM breast reconstruction. Two independent authors reviewed studies between 1970 and 2012 for inclusion and data extraction. Results: A total of 863 studies were identified and abstracts reviewed. A total of 24 articles were included, with 2148 patients and 3189 ADM reconstructions. Mean infection rates varied between 0% and 31.25%, with a combined average of 11.59%. When comparing antibiotic protocols of less than 24 hours and more than 24 hours, the average infection rate was 2.48% and 13.21%, respectively. Conclusion: The current literature lacks consensus on the necessary duration for postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis following breast reconstruction. The potential increased risk of infection associated with ADM remains controversial. Because of the lack of supportive evidence, we do not recommend prolonged postoperative antibiotics in ADM breast reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level III evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4233926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42339262014-12-18 A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction Phillips, Brett T. Bishawi, Muath Dagum, Alexander B. Bui, Duc T. Khan, Sami U. Eplasty Journal Article Introduction: Reported infection rates in breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) can exceed 31%. Prophylactic antibiotics remain controversial due to the absence of evidence-based literature. The purpose of this study was to examine published antibiotic regimens and their associated infection rates in this population. Methods: Systematic electronic searches were performed in PubMed, OVID, and the Cochrane databases for studies that reported on prophylactic antibiotic use and infection in patients undergoing ADM breast reconstruction. Two independent authors reviewed studies between 1970 and 2012 for inclusion and data extraction. Results: A total of 863 studies were identified and abstracts reviewed. A total of 24 articles were included, with 2148 patients and 3189 ADM reconstructions. Mean infection rates varied between 0% and 31.25%, with a combined average of 11.59%. When comparing antibiotic protocols of less than 24 hours and more than 24 hours, the average infection rate was 2.48% and 13.21%, respectively. Conclusion: The current literature lacks consensus on the necessary duration for postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis following breast reconstruction. The potential increased risk of infection associated with ADM remains controversial. Because of the lack of supportive evidence, we do not recommend prolonged postoperative antibiotics in ADM breast reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level III evidence. Open Science Company, LLC 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4233926/ /pubmed/25525481 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Phillips, Brett T.
Bishawi, Muath
Dagum, Alexander B.
Bui, Duc T.
Khan, Sami U.
A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title_full A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title_short A Systematic Review of Infection Rates and Associated Antibiotic Duration in Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction
title_sort systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525481
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsbrettt asystematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT bishawimuath asystematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT dagumalexanderb asystematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT buiduct asystematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT khansamiu asystematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT phillipsbrettt systematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT bishawimuath systematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT dagumalexanderb systematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT buiduct systematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction
AT khansamiu systematicreviewofinfectionratesandassociatedantibioticdurationinacellulardermalmatrixbreastreconstruction