Cargando…
Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing
Speech perception is known to rely on both auditory and visual information. However, sound-specific somatosensory input has been shown also to influence speech perceptual processing (Ito et al., 2009). In the present study, we addressed further the relationship between somatosensory information and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01198 |
_version_ | 1782344787091783680 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Takayuki Gracco, Vincent L. Ostry, David J. |
author_facet | Ito, Takayuki Gracco, Vincent L. Ostry, David J. |
author_sort | Ito, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speech perception is known to rely on both auditory and visual information. However, sound-specific somatosensory input has been shown also to influence speech perceptual processing (Ito et al., 2009). In the present study, we addressed further the relationship between somatosensory information and speech perceptual processing by addressing the hypothesis that the temporal relationship between orofacial movement and sound processing contributes to somatosensory–auditory interaction in speech perception. We examined the changes in event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to multisensory synchronous (simultaneous) and asynchronous (90 ms lag and lead) somatosensory and auditory stimulation compared to individual unisensory auditory and somatosensory stimulation alone. We used a robotic device to apply facial skin somatosensory deformations that were similar in timing and duration to those experienced in speech production. Following synchronous multisensory stimulation the amplitude of the ERP was reliably different from the two unisensory potentials. More importantly, the magnitude of the ERP difference varied as a function of the relative timing of the somatosensory–auditory stimulation. Event-related activity change due to stimulus timing was seen between 160 and 220 ms following somatosensory onset, mostly around the parietal area. The results demonstrate a dynamic modulation of somatosensory–auditory convergence and suggest the contribution of somatosensory information for speech processing process is dependent on the specific temporal order of sensory inputs in speech production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4233986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42339862014-12-01 Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing Ito, Takayuki Gracco, Vincent L. Ostry, David J. Front Psychol Psychology Speech perception is known to rely on both auditory and visual information. However, sound-specific somatosensory input has been shown also to influence speech perceptual processing (Ito et al., 2009). In the present study, we addressed further the relationship between somatosensory information and speech perceptual processing by addressing the hypothesis that the temporal relationship between orofacial movement and sound processing contributes to somatosensory–auditory interaction in speech perception. We examined the changes in event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to multisensory synchronous (simultaneous) and asynchronous (90 ms lag and lead) somatosensory and auditory stimulation compared to individual unisensory auditory and somatosensory stimulation alone. We used a robotic device to apply facial skin somatosensory deformations that were similar in timing and duration to those experienced in speech production. Following synchronous multisensory stimulation the amplitude of the ERP was reliably different from the two unisensory potentials. More importantly, the magnitude of the ERP difference varied as a function of the relative timing of the somatosensory–auditory stimulation. Event-related activity change due to stimulus timing was seen between 160 and 220 ms following somatosensory onset, mostly around the parietal area. The results demonstrate a dynamic modulation of somatosensory–auditory convergence and suggest the contribution of somatosensory information for speech processing process is dependent on the specific temporal order of sensory inputs in speech production. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4233986/ /pubmed/25452733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01198 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ito, Gracco and Ostry. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Ito, Takayuki Gracco, Vincent L. Ostry, David J. Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title_full | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title_fullStr | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title_short | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
title_sort | temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itotakayuki temporalfactorsaffectingsomatosensoryauditoryinteractionsinspeechprocessing AT graccovincentl temporalfactorsaffectingsomatosensoryauditoryinteractionsinspeechprocessing AT ostrydavidj temporalfactorsaffectingsomatosensoryauditoryinteractionsinspeechprocessing |