Cargando…

Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness trials comparing multicomponent behavioural weight management programmes with controls in overweight and obese adults set out to determine the effectiveness of these interventions implemented in routine practice. To be included, interventions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann-Boyce, J, Johns, D J, Jebb, S A, Summerbell, C, Aveyard, P, Behavioural Weight Management Review Group
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25112559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12220
_version_ 1782344788965588992
author Hartmann-Boyce, J
Johns, D J
Jebb, S A
Summerbell, C
Aveyard, P
Behavioural Weight Management Review Group,
author_facet Hartmann-Boyce, J
Johns, D J
Jebb, S A
Summerbell, C
Aveyard, P
Behavioural Weight Management Review Group,
author_sort Hartmann-Boyce, J
collection PubMed
description This systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness trials comparing multicomponent behavioural weight management programmes with controls in overweight and obese adults set out to determine the effectiveness of these interventions implemented in routine practice. To be included, interventions must have been multicomponent, delivered by the therapists who would deliver the intervention in routine practice and in that same context, and must be widely available or feasible to implement with little additional infrastructure or staffing. Searches of electronic databases were conducted, and augmented by screening reference lists and contacting experts (November 2012). Data were extracted by two reviewers, with mean difference between intervention and control for 12-month change in weight, blood pressure, lipids and glucose calculated using baseline observation carried forward. Data were also extracted on adverse events, quality of life and mood measures. Although there were many published efficacy trials, only eight effectiveness trials met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results from five study arms providing access to commercial weight management programmes detected significant weight loss at 12 months (mean difference −2.22 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.90 to −1.54). Results from two arms of a study testing a commercial programme providing meal replacements also detected significant weight loss (mean difference −6.83 kg, 95% CI −8.39 to −5.26). In contrast, pooled results from five interventions delivered by primary care teams showed no evidence of an effect on weight (mean difference −0.45 kg, 95% CI −1.34 to 0.43). One study testing an interactive web-based intervention detected a significant effect in favour of the intervention at 12 months, but the study was judged to be at high risk of bias and the effect did not persist at 18 months. Few studies reported other outcomes, limiting comparisons between interventions. Few trials have examined the effectiveness of behavioural weight loss programmes delivered in everyday contexts. These trials suggest that commercial interventions delivered in the community are effective for achieving weight loss. There is no evidence that interventions delivered within primary care settings by generalist primary care teams trained in weight management achieve meaningful weight loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4233997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42339972014-12-03 Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis Hartmann-Boyce, J Johns, D J Jebb, S A Summerbell, C Aveyard, P Behavioural Weight Management Review Group, Obes Rev Obesity Management This systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness trials comparing multicomponent behavioural weight management programmes with controls in overweight and obese adults set out to determine the effectiveness of these interventions implemented in routine practice. To be included, interventions must have been multicomponent, delivered by the therapists who would deliver the intervention in routine practice and in that same context, and must be widely available or feasible to implement with little additional infrastructure or staffing. Searches of electronic databases were conducted, and augmented by screening reference lists and contacting experts (November 2012). Data were extracted by two reviewers, with mean difference between intervention and control for 12-month change in weight, blood pressure, lipids and glucose calculated using baseline observation carried forward. Data were also extracted on adverse events, quality of life and mood measures. Although there were many published efficacy trials, only eight effectiveness trials met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results from five study arms providing access to commercial weight management programmes detected significant weight loss at 12 months (mean difference −2.22 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.90 to −1.54). Results from two arms of a study testing a commercial programme providing meal replacements also detected significant weight loss (mean difference −6.83 kg, 95% CI −8.39 to −5.26). In contrast, pooled results from five interventions delivered by primary care teams showed no evidence of an effect on weight (mean difference −0.45 kg, 95% CI −1.34 to 0.43). One study testing an interactive web-based intervention detected a significant effect in favour of the intervention at 12 months, but the study was judged to be at high risk of bias and the effect did not persist at 18 months. Few studies reported other outcomes, limiting comparisons between interventions. Few trials have examined the effectiveness of behavioural weight loss programmes delivered in everyday contexts. These trials suggest that commercial interventions delivered in the community are effective for achieving weight loss. There is no evidence that interventions delivered within primary care settings by generalist primary care teams trained in weight management achieve meaningful weight loss. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4233997/ /pubmed/25112559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12220 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Obesity Management
Hartmann-Boyce, J
Johns, D J
Jebb, S A
Summerbell, C
Aveyard, P
Behavioural Weight Management Review Group,
Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Obesity Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25112559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12220
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannboycej behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnsdj behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jebbsa behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT summerbellc behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aveyardp behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT behaviouralweightmanagementreviewgroup behaviouralweightmanagementprogrammesforadultsassessedbytrialsconductedineverydaycontextssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis