Cargando…

Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyle, B, Morris, JK, McConkey, R, Garne, E, Loane, M, Addor, MC, Gatt, M, Haeusler, M, Latos-Bielenska, A, Lelong, N, McDonnell, R, Mullaney, C, O’Mahony, M, Dolk, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574
_version_ 1782344789649260544
author Boyle, B
Morris, JK
McConkey, R
Garne, E
Loane, M
Addor, MC
Gatt, M
Haeusler, M
Latos-Bielenska, A
Lelong, N
McDonnell, R
Mullaney, C
O’Mahony, M
Dolk, H
author_facet Boyle, B
Morris, JK
McConkey, R
Garne, E
Loane, M
Addor, MC
Gatt, M
Haeusler, M
Latos-Bielenska, A
Lelong, N
McDonnell, R
Mullaney, C
O’Mahony, M
Dolk, H
author_sort Boyle, B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8 million births 1990–2009; 2.89% multiple births. METHODS: DS cases included livebirths, fetal deaths from 20 weeks, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Zygosity is inferred from like/unlike sex for birth denominators, and from concordance for DS cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of DS per fetus/baby from multiple versus singleton pregnancies and per pregnancy in monozygotic/dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies. Proportion of prenatally diagnosed and pregnancy outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Poisson and logistic regression stratified for maternal age, country and time. RESULTS: Overall, the adjusted (adj) RR of DS for fetus/babies from multiple versus singleton pregnancies was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53–0.62), similar for all maternal ages except for mothers over 44, for whom it was considerably lower. In 8.7% of twin pairs affected by DS, both co-twins were diagnosed with the condition. The adjRR of DS for monozygotic versus singleton pregnancies was 0.34 (95% CI 0.25–0.44) and for dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies 1.34 (95% CI 1.23–1.46). DS fetuses from multiple births were less likely to be prenatally diagnosed than singletons (adjOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.50–0.78]) and following diagnosis less likely to be TOPFA (adjOR 0.40 [95% CI 0.27–0.59]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DS per fetus/baby is lower in multiple than singleton pregnancies. These estimates can be used for genetic counselling and prenatal screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42340002014-12-03 Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening Boyle, B Morris, JK McConkey, R Garne, E Loane, M Addor, MC Gatt, M Haeusler, M Latos-Bielenska, A Lelong, N McDonnell, R Mullaney, C O’Mahony, M Dolk, H BJOG Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8 million births 1990–2009; 2.89% multiple births. METHODS: DS cases included livebirths, fetal deaths from 20 weeks, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Zygosity is inferred from like/unlike sex for birth denominators, and from concordance for DS cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of DS per fetus/baby from multiple versus singleton pregnancies and per pregnancy in monozygotic/dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies. Proportion of prenatally diagnosed and pregnancy outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Poisson and logistic regression stratified for maternal age, country and time. RESULTS: Overall, the adjusted (adj) RR of DS for fetus/babies from multiple versus singleton pregnancies was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53–0.62), similar for all maternal ages except for mothers over 44, for whom it was considerably lower. In 8.7% of twin pairs affected by DS, both co-twins were diagnosed with the condition. The adjRR of DS for monozygotic versus singleton pregnancies was 0.34 (95% CI 0.25–0.44) and for dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies 1.34 (95% CI 1.23–1.46). DS fetuses from multiple births were less likely to be prenatally diagnosed than singletons (adjOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.50–0.78]) and following diagnosis less likely to be TOPFA (adjOR 0.40 [95% CI 0.27–0.59]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DS per fetus/baby is lower in multiple than singleton pregnancies. These estimates can be used for genetic counselling and prenatal screening. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-04 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4234000/ /pubmed/24495335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574 Text en © 2014 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Boyle, B
Morris, JK
McConkey, R
Garne, E
Loane, M
Addor, MC
Gatt, M
Haeusler, M
Latos-Bielenska, A
Lelong, N
McDonnell, R
Mullaney, C
O’Mahony, M
Dolk, H
Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title_full Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title_fullStr Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title_short Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
title_sort prevalence and risk of down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in europe: implications for prenatal screening
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574
work_keys_str_mv AT boyleb prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT morrisjk prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT mcconkeyr prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT garnee prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT loanem prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT addormc prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT gattm prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT haeuslerm prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT latosbielenskaa prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT lelongn prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT mcdonnellr prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT mullaneyc prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT omahonym prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening
AT dolkh prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening