Cargando…
Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening
OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574 |
_version_ | 1782344789649260544 |
---|---|
author | Boyle, B Morris, JK McConkey, R Garne, E Loane, M Addor, MC Gatt, M Haeusler, M Latos-Bielenska, A Lelong, N McDonnell, R Mullaney, C O’Mahony, M Dolk, H |
author_facet | Boyle, B Morris, JK McConkey, R Garne, E Loane, M Addor, MC Gatt, M Haeusler, M Latos-Bielenska, A Lelong, N McDonnell, R Mullaney, C O’Mahony, M Dolk, H |
author_sort | Boyle, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8 million births 1990–2009; 2.89% multiple births. METHODS: DS cases included livebirths, fetal deaths from 20 weeks, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Zygosity is inferred from like/unlike sex for birth denominators, and from concordance for DS cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of DS per fetus/baby from multiple versus singleton pregnancies and per pregnancy in monozygotic/dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies. Proportion of prenatally diagnosed and pregnancy outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Poisson and logistic regression stratified for maternal age, country and time. RESULTS: Overall, the adjusted (adj) RR of DS for fetus/babies from multiple versus singleton pregnancies was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53–0.62), similar for all maternal ages except for mothers over 44, for whom it was considerably lower. In 8.7% of twin pairs affected by DS, both co-twins were diagnosed with the condition. The adjRR of DS for monozygotic versus singleton pregnancies was 0.34 (95% CI 0.25–0.44) and for dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies 1.34 (95% CI 1.23–1.46). DS fetuses from multiple births were less likely to be prenatally diagnosed than singletons (adjOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.50–0.78]) and following diagnosis less likely to be TOPFA (adjOR 0.40 [95% CI 0.27–0.59]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DS per fetus/baby is lower in multiple than singleton pregnancies. These estimates can be used for genetic counselling and prenatal screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42340002014-12-03 Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening Boyle, B Morris, JK McConkey, R Garne, E Loane, M Addor, MC Gatt, M Haeusler, M Latos-Bielenska, A Lelong, N McDonnell, R Mullaney, C O’Mahony, M Dolk, H BJOG Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries. SETTING: Eight European countries. POPULATION: 14.8 million births 1990–2009; 2.89% multiple births. METHODS: DS cases included livebirths, fetal deaths from 20 weeks, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Zygosity is inferred from like/unlike sex for birth denominators, and from concordance for DS cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of DS per fetus/baby from multiple versus singleton pregnancies and per pregnancy in monozygotic/dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies. Proportion of prenatally diagnosed and pregnancy outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Poisson and logistic regression stratified for maternal age, country and time. RESULTS: Overall, the adjusted (adj) RR of DS for fetus/babies from multiple versus singleton pregnancies was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53–0.62), similar for all maternal ages except for mothers over 44, for whom it was considerably lower. In 8.7% of twin pairs affected by DS, both co-twins were diagnosed with the condition. The adjRR of DS for monozygotic versus singleton pregnancies was 0.34 (95% CI 0.25–0.44) and for dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies 1.34 (95% CI 1.23–1.46). DS fetuses from multiple births were less likely to be prenatally diagnosed than singletons (adjOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.50–0.78]) and following diagnosis less likely to be TOPFA (adjOR 0.40 [95% CI 0.27–0.59]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DS per fetus/baby is lower in multiple than singleton pregnancies. These estimates can be used for genetic counselling and prenatal screening. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-04 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4234000/ /pubmed/24495335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574 Text en © 2014 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Boyle, B Morris, JK McConkey, R Garne, E Loane, M Addor, MC Gatt, M Haeusler, M Latos-Bielenska, A Lelong, N McDonnell, R Mullaney, C O’Mahony, M Dolk, H Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title | Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title_full | Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title_short | Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening |
title_sort | prevalence and risk of down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in europe: implications for prenatal screening |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boyleb prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT morrisjk prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT mcconkeyr prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT garnee prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT loanem prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT addormc prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT gattm prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT haeuslerm prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT latosbielenskaa prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT lelongn prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT mcdonnellr prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT mullaneyc prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT omahonym prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening AT dolkh prevalenceandriskofdownsyndromeinmonozygoticanddizygoticmultiplepregnanciesineuropeimplicationsforprenatalscreening |