Cargando…
Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30 |
_version_ | 1782344792416452608 |
---|---|
author | Svantesson, Mia Karlsson, Jan Boitte, Pierre Schildman, Jan Dauwerse, Linda Widdershoven, Guy Pedersen, Reidar Huisman, Martijn Molewijk, Bert |
author_facet | Svantesson, Mia Karlsson, Jan Boitte, Pierre Schildman, Jan Dauwerse, Linda Widdershoven, Guy Pedersen, Reidar Huisman, Martijn Molewijk, Bert |
author_sort | Svantesson, Mia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation instrument. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-contextual evaluation instrument measuring health care providers’ experiences and perceived importance of outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. METHODS: A multi-item instrument for assessing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) was constructed through an iterative process, founded on a literature review and modified through a multistep review by ethicists and health care providers. The instrument measures perceived importance of outcomes before and after MCD, as well as experienced outcomes during MCD and in daily work. A purposeful sample of 86 European participants contributed to a Delphi panel and content validity testing. The Delphi panel (n = 13), consisting of ethicists and ethics researchers, participated in three Delphi-rounds. Health care providers (n = 73) participated in the content validity testing through ‘think-aloud’ interviews and a method using Content Validity Index. RESULTS: The development process resulted in the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD), which consists of two sections, one to be completed before a participant’s first MCD and the other after completing multiple MCDs. The instrument contains a few open-ended questions and 26 specific items with a corresponding rating/response scale representing various MCD outcomes. The items were categorised into the following six domains: Enhanced emotional support, Enhanced collaboration, Improved moral reflexivity, Improved moral attitude, Improvement on organizational level and Concrete results. CONCLUSIONS: A tentative instrument has been developed that seems to cover main outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The next step will be to test the Euro-MCD in a field study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42340132014-11-18 Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) Svantesson, Mia Karlsson, Jan Boitte, Pierre Schildman, Jan Dauwerse, Linda Widdershoven, Guy Pedersen, Reidar Huisman, Martijn Molewijk, Bert BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation instrument. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-contextual evaluation instrument measuring health care providers’ experiences and perceived importance of outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. METHODS: A multi-item instrument for assessing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) was constructed through an iterative process, founded on a literature review and modified through a multistep review by ethicists and health care providers. The instrument measures perceived importance of outcomes before and after MCD, as well as experienced outcomes during MCD and in daily work. A purposeful sample of 86 European participants contributed to a Delphi panel and content validity testing. The Delphi panel (n = 13), consisting of ethicists and ethics researchers, participated in three Delphi-rounds. Health care providers (n = 73) participated in the content validity testing through ‘think-aloud’ interviews and a method using Content Validity Index. RESULTS: The development process resulted in the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD), which consists of two sections, one to be completed before a participant’s first MCD and the other after completing multiple MCDs. The instrument contains a few open-ended questions and 26 specific items with a corresponding rating/response scale representing various MCD outcomes. The items were categorised into the following six domains: Enhanced emotional support, Enhanced collaboration, Improved moral reflexivity, Improved moral attitude, Improvement on organizational level and Concrete results. CONCLUSIONS: A tentative instrument has been developed that seems to cover main outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The next step will be to test the Euro-MCD in a field study. BioMed Central 2014-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4234013/ /pubmed/24712735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30 Text en Copyright © 2014 Svantesson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Svantesson, Mia Karlsson, Jan Boitte, Pierre Schildman, Jan Dauwerse, Linda Widdershoven, Guy Pedersen, Reidar Huisman, Martijn Molewijk, Bert Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title | Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title_full | Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title_short | Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) |
title_sort | outcomes of moral case deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the euro-mcd) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svantessonmia outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT karlssonjan outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT boittepierre outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT schildmanjan outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT dauwerselinda outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT widdershovenguy outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT pedersenreidar outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT huismanmartijn outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd AT molewijkbert outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd |