Cargando…

Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)

BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svantesson, Mia, Karlsson, Jan, Boitte, Pierre, Schildman, Jan, Dauwerse, Linda, Widdershoven, Guy, Pedersen, Reidar, Huisman, Martijn, Molewijk, Bert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30
_version_ 1782344792416452608
author Svantesson, Mia
Karlsson, Jan
Boitte, Pierre
Schildman, Jan
Dauwerse, Linda
Widdershoven, Guy
Pedersen, Reidar
Huisman, Martijn
Molewijk, Bert
author_facet Svantesson, Mia
Karlsson, Jan
Boitte, Pierre
Schildman, Jan
Dauwerse, Linda
Widdershoven, Guy
Pedersen, Reidar
Huisman, Martijn
Molewijk, Bert
author_sort Svantesson, Mia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation instrument. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-contextual evaluation instrument measuring health care providers’ experiences and perceived importance of outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. METHODS: A multi-item instrument for assessing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) was constructed through an iterative process, founded on a literature review and modified through a multistep review by ethicists and health care providers. The instrument measures perceived importance of outcomes before and after MCD, as well as experienced outcomes during MCD and in daily work. A purposeful sample of 86 European participants contributed to a Delphi panel and content validity testing. The Delphi panel (n = 13), consisting of ethicists and ethics researchers, participated in three Delphi-rounds. Health care providers (n = 73) participated in the content validity testing through ‘think-aloud’ interviews and a method using Content Validity Index. RESULTS: The development process resulted in the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD), which consists of two sections, one to be completed before a participant’s first MCD and the other after completing multiple MCDs. The instrument contains a few open-ended questions and 26 specific items with a corresponding rating/response scale representing various MCD outcomes. The items were categorised into the following six domains: Enhanced emotional support, Enhanced collaboration, Improved moral reflexivity, Improved moral attitude, Improvement on organizational level and Concrete results. CONCLUSIONS: A tentative instrument has been developed that seems to cover main outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The next step will be to test the Euro-MCD in a field study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42340132014-11-18 Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD) Svantesson, Mia Karlsson, Jan Boitte, Pierre Schildman, Jan Dauwerse, Linda Widdershoven, Guy Pedersen, Reidar Huisman, Martijn Molewijk, Bert BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation instrument. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-contextual evaluation instrument measuring health care providers’ experiences and perceived importance of outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. METHODS: A multi-item instrument for assessing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) was constructed through an iterative process, founded on a literature review and modified through a multistep review by ethicists and health care providers. The instrument measures perceived importance of outcomes before and after MCD, as well as experienced outcomes during MCD and in daily work. A purposeful sample of 86 European participants contributed to a Delphi panel and content validity testing. The Delphi panel (n = 13), consisting of ethicists and ethics researchers, participated in three Delphi-rounds. Health care providers (n = 73) participated in the content validity testing through ‘think-aloud’ interviews and a method using Content Validity Index. RESULTS: The development process resulted in the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD), which consists of two sections, one to be completed before a participant’s first MCD and the other after completing multiple MCDs. The instrument contains a few open-ended questions and 26 specific items with a corresponding rating/response scale representing various MCD outcomes. The items were categorised into the following six domains: Enhanced emotional support, Enhanced collaboration, Improved moral reflexivity, Improved moral attitude, Improvement on organizational level and Concrete results. CONCLUSIONS: A tentative instrument has been developed that seems to cover main outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The next step will be to test the Euro-MCD in a field study. BioMed Central 2014-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4234013/ /pubmed/24712735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30 Text en Copyright © 2014 Svantesson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Svantesson, Mia
Karlsson, Jan
Boitte, Pierre
Schildman, Jan
Dauwerse, Linda
Widdershoven, Guy
Pedersen, Reidar
Huisman, Martijn
Molewijk, Bert
Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title_full Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title_fullStr Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title_short Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)
title_sort outcomes of moral case deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the euro-mcd)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-30
work_keys_str_mv AT svantessonmia outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT karlssonjan outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT boittepierre outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT schildmanjan outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT dauwerselinda outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT widdershovenguy outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT pedersenreidar outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT huismanmartijn outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd
AT molewijkbert outcomesofmoralcasedeliberationthedevelopmentofanevaluationinstrumentforclinicalethicssupporttheeuromcd