Cargando…

Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18°...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledger, Araminta E.W., Borri, Marco, Pope, Romney J.E., Scurr, Erica D., Wallace, Toni, Richardson, Cheryl, Usher, Marianne, Allen, Steven, Wilson, Robin M., Thomas, Karen, deSouza, Nandita M., Leach, Martin O., Schmidt, Maria A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association Of University Radiologists 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014
_version_ 1782344799088541696
author Ledger, Araminta E.W.
Borri, Marco
Pope, Romney J.E.
Scurr, Erica D.
Wallace, Toni
Richardson, Cheryl
Usher, Marianne
Allen, Steven
Wilson, Robin M.
Thomas, Karen
deSouza, Nandita M.
Leach, Martin O.
Schmidt, Maria A.
author_facet Ledger, Araminta E.W.
Borri, Marco
Pope, Romney J.E.
Scurr, Erica D.
Wallace, Toni
Richardson, Cheryl
Usher, Marianne
Allen, Steven
Wilson, Robin M.
Thomas, Karen
deSouza, Nandita M.
Leach, Martin O.
Schmidt, Maria A.
author_sort Ledger, Araminta E.W.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7–10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, E(max), and time-to-peak enhancement, T(max), were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, E(calc), were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to E(max). Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests). RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. E(max) increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater T(max) than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between E(calc) and E(max) (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Association Of University Radiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42340812014-11-19 Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations Ledger, Araminta E.W. Borri, Marco Pope, Romney J.E. Scurr, Erica D. Wallace, Toni Richardson, Cheryl Usher, Marianne Allen, Steven Wilson, Robin M. Thomas, Karen deSouza, Nandita M. Leach, Martin O. Schmidt, Maria A. Acad Radiol Original Investigation RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7–10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, E(max), and time-to-peak enhancement, T(max), were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, E(calc), were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to E(max). Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests). RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. E(max) increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater T(max) than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between E(calc) and E(max) (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences. Association Of University Radiologists 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4234081/ /pubmed/25179563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014 Text en © 2014 AUR. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ledger, Araminta E.W.
Borri, Marco
Pope, Romney J.E.
Scurr, Erica D.
Wallace, Toni
Richardson, Cheryl
Usher, Marianne
Allen, Steven
Wilson, Robin M.
Thomas, Karen
deSouza, Nandita M.
Leach, Martin O.
Schmidt, Maria A.
Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title_full Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title_fullStr Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title_short Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
title_sort investigating the influence of flip angle and k-space sampling on dynamic contrast-enhanced mri breast examinations
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014
work_keys_str_mv AT ledgeraramintaew investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT borrimarco investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT poperomneyje investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT scurrericad investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT wallacetoni investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT richardsoncheryl investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT ushermarianne investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT allensteven investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT wilsonrobinm investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT thomaskaren investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT desouzananditam investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT leachmartino investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations
AT schmidtmariaa investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations