Cargando…
Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18°...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association Of University Radiologists
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014 |
_version_ | 1782344799088541696 |
---|---|
author | Ledger, Araminta E.W. Borri, Marco Pope, Romney J.E. Scurr, Erica D. Wallace, Toni Richardson, Cheryl Usher, Marianne Allen, Steven Wilson, Robin M. Thomas, Karen deSouza, Nandita M. Leach, Martin O. Schmidt, Maria A. |
author_facet | Ledger, Araminta E.W. Borri, Marco Pope, Romney J.E. Scurr, Erica D. Wallace, Toni Richardson, Cheryl Usher, Marianne Allen, Steven Wilson, Robin M. Thomas, Karen deSouza, Nandita M. Leach, Martin O. Schmidt, Maria A. |
author_sort | Ledger, Araminta E.W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7–10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, E(max), and time-to-peak enhancement, T(max), were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, E(calc), were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to E(max). Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests). RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. E(max) increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater T(max) than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between E(calc) and E(max) (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Association Of University Radiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42340812014-11-19 Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations Ledger, Araminta E.W. Borri, Marco Pope, Romney J.E. Scurr, Erica D. Wallace, Toni Richardson, Cheryl Usher, Marianne Allen, Steven Wilson, Robin M. Thomas, Karen deSouza, Nandita M. Leach, Martin O. Schmidt, Maria A. Acad Radiol Original Investigation RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7–10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, E(max), and time-to-peak enhancement, T(max), were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, E(calc), were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to E(max). Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests). RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. E(max) increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater T(max) than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between E(calc) and E(max) (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences. Association Of University Radiologists 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4234081/ /pubmed/25179563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014 Text en © 2014 AUR. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Ledger, Araminta E.W. Borri, Marco Pope, Romney J.E. Scurr, Erica D. Wallace, Toni Richardson, Cheryl Usher, Marianne Allen, Steven Wilson, Robin M. Thomas, Karen deSouza, Nandita M. Leach, Martin O. Schmidt, Maria A. Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title | Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title_full | Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title_fullStr | Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title_short | Investigating the Influence of Flip Angle and k-Space Sampling on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Examinations |
title_sort | investigating the influence of flip angle and k-space sampling on dynamic contrast-enhanced mri breast examinations |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ledgeraramintaew investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT borrimarco investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT poperomneyje investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT scurrericad investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT wallacetoni investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT richardsoncheryl investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT ushermarianne investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT allensteven investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT wilsonrobinm investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT thomaskaren investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT desouzananditam investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT leachmartino investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations AT schmidtmariaa investigatingtheinfluenceofflipangleandkspacesamplingondynamiccontrastenhancedmribreastexaminations |