Cargando…

Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)

We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutrit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kormas, Konstantinos A, Meziti, Alexandra, Mente, Eleni, Frentzos, Athanasios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202
_version_ 1782344823392436224
author Kormas, Konstantinos A
Meziti, Alexandra
Mente, Eleni
Frentzos, Athanasios
author_facet Kormas, Konstantinos A
Meziti, Alexandra
Mente, Eleni
Frentzos, Athanasios
author_sort Kormas, Konstantinos A
collection PubMed
description We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutritional treatments, with the bacteria dominating over the Archaea. Most of the Bacteria belonged to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The number of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was reduced from the wild to the conventionally reared fish, implying a response of the gut microorganisms to the supplied food and possibly alterations in food assimilation. The dominant bacterial OTU in all examined fish was closely related to the genus Diaphorobacter. This is the first time that a member of the β-Proteobacteria, which dominate in freshwaters, are so important in a marine fish gut. In total the majority of the few Archaea OTUs found, were related to methane metabolism. The inferred physiological roles of the dominant prokaryotes are related to the metabolism of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds. This study showed the responsive feature of the sea bream gut prokaryotic communities to their diets and also the differences of the conventional in comparison to the organic and wild sea bream gut microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42342632014-12-04 Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) Kormas, Konstantinos A Meziti, Alexandra Mente, Eleni Frentzos, Athanasios Microbiologyopen Original Research We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutritional treatments, with the bacteria dominating over the Archaea. Most of the Bacteria belonged to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The number of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was reduced from the wild to the conventionally reared fish, implying a response of the gut microorganisms to the supplied food and possibly alterations in food assimilation. The dominant bacterial OTU in all examined fish was closely related to the genus Diaphorobacter. This is the first time that a member of the β-Proteobacteria, which dominate in freshwaters, are so important in a marine fish gut. In total the majority of the few Archaea OTUs found, were related to methane metabolism. The inferred physiological roles of the dominant prokaryotes are related to the metabolism of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds. This study showed the responsive feature of the sea bream gut prokaryotic communities to their diets and also the differences of the conventional in comparison to the organic and wild sea bream gut microbiota. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4234263/ /pubmed/25066034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202 Text en © 2014 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kormas, Konstantinos A
Meziti, Alexandra
Mente, Eleni
Frentzos, Athanasios
Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title_full Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title_fullStr Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title_full_unstemmed Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title_short Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
title_sort dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (sparus aurata)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202
work_keys_str_mv AT kormaskonstantinosa dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata
AT mezitialexandra dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata
AT menteeleni dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata
AT frentzosathanasios dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata