Cargando…
Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata)
We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutrit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202 |
_version_ | 1782344823392436224 |
---|---|
author | Kormas, Konstantinos A Meziti, Alexandra Mente, Eleni Frentzos, Athanasios |
author_facet | Kormas, Konstantinos A Meziti, Alexandra Mente, Eleni Frentzos, Athanasios |
author_sort | Kormas, Konstantinos A |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutritional treatments, with the bacteria dominating over the Archaea. Most of the Bacteria belonged to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The number of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was reduced from the wild to the conventionally reared fish, implying a response of the gut microorganisms to the supplied food and possibly alterations in food assimilation. The dominant bacterial OTU in all examined fish was closely related to the genus Diaphorobacter. This is the first time that a member of the β-Proteobacteria, which dominate in freshwaters, are so important in a marine fish gut. In total the majority of the few Archaea OTUs found, were related to methane metabolism. The inferred physiological roles of the dominant prokaryotes are related to the metabolism of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds. This study showed the responsive feature of the sea bream gut prokaryotic communities to their diets and also the differences of the conventional in comparison to the organic and wild sea bream gut microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42342632014-12-04 Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) Kormas, Konstantinos A Meziti, Alexandra Mente, Eleni Frentzos, Athanasios Microbiologyopen Original Research We compared the gut prokaryotic communities in wild, organically-, and conventionally reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) individuals. Gut microbial communities were identified using tag pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. There were distinct prokaryotic communities in the three different fish nutritional treatments, with the bacteria dominating over the Archaea. Most of the Bacteria belonged to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The number of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was reduced from the wild to the conventionally reared fish, implying a response of the gut microorganisms to the supplied food and possibly alterations in food assimilation. The dominant bacterial OTU in all examined fish was closely related to the genus Diaphorobacter. This is the first time that a member of the β-Proteobacteria, which dominate in freshwaters, are so important in a marine fish gut. In total the majority of the few Archaea OTUs found, were related to methane metabolism. The inferred physiological roles of the dominant prokaryotes are related to the metabolism of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds. This study showed the responsive feature of the sea bream gut prokaryotic communities to their diets and also the differences of the conventional in comparison to the organic and wild sea bream gut microbiota. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4234263/ /pubmed/25066034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202 Text en © 2014 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kormas, Konstantinos A Meziti, Alexandra Mente, Eleni Frentzos, Athanasios Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title | Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title_full | Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title_fullStr | Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title_full_unstemmed | Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title_short | Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata) |
title_sort | dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (sparus aurata) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kormaskonstantinosa dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata AT mezitialexandra dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata AT menteeleni dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata AT frentzosathanasios dietarydifferencesarereflectedonthegutprokaryoticcommunitystructureofwildandcommerciallyrearedseabreamsparusaurata |