Cargando…

Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène, da SILVA, Adriana Fernandes, MICHELON, Douver, PIVA, Evandro, CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio, DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21625737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300008
_version_ 1782344838619856896
author van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène
da SILVA, Adriana Fernandes
MICHELON, Douver
PIVA, Evandro
CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio
DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando
author_facet van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène
da SILVA, Adriana Fernandes
MICHELON, Douver
PIVA, Evandro
CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio
DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando
author_sort van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC). Specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water and immersed in saline (pH 7.0) or 0.1 M lactic acid solution (pH 4.0) for 15 days. Surface roughness readings were taken with a profilometer (Surfcorder SE1200) before and after the storage period. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (comparison among cements and storage solutions) or paired t-test (comparison before and after the storage period) at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The values for average surface roughness were statistically different (p<0.001) among cements at both baseline and after storage. The roughness values of cements in a decreasing order were ZP>RMGIC>C>R (p<0.001). After 15 days, immersion in lactic acid solution resulted in the highest surface roughness for all cements (p<0.05), except for the RC group (p>0.05). Compared to the current threshold (0.2 µm) related to biofilm accumulation, both RC and C remained below the threshold, even after acidic challenge by immersion in lactic acid solution. CONCLUSIONS: Storage time and immersion in lactic acid solution increased the surface roughness of the majority of the tested cements. RC presented the smoothest surface and it was not influenced by storage conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42343332014-11-19 Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène da SILVA, Adriana Fernandes MICHELON, Douver PIVA, Evandro CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC). Specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water and immersed in saline (pH 7.0) or 0.1 M lactic acid solution (pH 4.0) for 15 days. Surface roughness readings were taken with a profilometer (Surfcorder SE1200) before and after the storage period. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (comparison among cements and storage solutions) or paired t-test (comparison before and after the storage period) at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The values for average surface roughness were statistically different (p<0.001) among cements at both baseline and after storage. The roughness values of cements in a decreasing order were ZP>RMGIC>C>R (p<0.001). After 15 days, immersion in lactic acid solution resulted in the highest surface roughness for all cements (p<0.05), except for the RC group (p>0.05). Compared to the current threshold (0.2 µm) related to biofilm accumulation, both RC and C remained below the threshold, even after acidic challenge by immersion in lactic acid solution. CONCLUSIONS: Storage time and immersion in lactic acid solution increased the surface roughness of the majority of the tested cements. RC presented the smoothest surface and it was not influenced by storage conditions. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4234333/ /pubmed/21625737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300008 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van de SANDE, Françoise Hélène
da SILVA, Adriana Fernandes
MICHELON, Douver
PIVA, Evandro
CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio
DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando
Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_full Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_fullStr Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_short Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_sort surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21625737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300008
work_keys_str_mv AT vandesandefrancoisehelene surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT dasilvaadrianafernandes surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT michelondouver surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT pivaevandro surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT cencimaximilianosergio surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT demarcoflaviofernando surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions