Cargando…

Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?

PURPOSE: The German Ophthalmological Society (GOS) recently proposed surgical entry criteria, i.e. 300 cataract surgeries. We herein correlate the surgical hands-on experience with the risk of posterior capsule ruptures in order to assess whether this number is appropriate. METHODS: We identified al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böhringer, Daniel, Vach, Werner, Hagenlocher, Kai, Eberwein, Philipp, Maier, Philip, Reinhard, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25401738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112819
_version_ 1782344876826820608
author Böhringer, Daniel
Vach, Werner
Hagenlocher, Kai
Eberwein, Philipp
Maier, Philip
Reinhard, Thomas
author_facet Böhringer, Daniel
Vach, Werner
Hagenlocher, Kai
Eberwein, Philipp
Maier, Philip
Reinhard, Thomas
author_sort Böhringer, Daniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The German Ophthalmological Society (GOS) recently proposed surgical entry criteria, i.e. 300 cataract surgeries. We herein correlate the surgical hands-on experience with the risk of posterior capsule ruptures in order to assess whether this number is appropriate. METHODS: We identified all cataract operations that had been performed at the University Eye Hospital Freiburg since 1995. For each surgeon, we assigned a running number to his/her procedures in the order they had been performed. Thereafter, we excluded all combined procedures and the second eyes. We then selected the 5475 surgical reports between November 2008 and November 2012 for detailed review. We additionally classified each surgery into low- vs. high- à priori risk for posterior capsule ruptures. We fitted a multifactorial logistic regression model to assess the GOS recommendation of 300 surgeries under supervision. In the low-risk group, we additionally visualized the 'typical' learning curve by plotting the posterior capsule ruptures against the respective rank numbers. RESULTS: The odds ratio for posterior capsule ruptures of 'learning-mode' (one of the respective surgeon's 300 first procedures) vs. the non-learning-mode was 3.8 (p<0.0001). By contrast, classification into the low-risk group lowered the risk of posterior capsule ruptures three fold (p<0.0001). According to the low-risk plot, the surgeons started with a complication rate of 4% and continuously improved towards 0.5% after 1500 operations. Thereafter, the rate increased again and stabilized around one percent. CONCLUSION: The learning curve with respect to posterior capsule ruptures is surprisingly flat. The GOS entry criterion of 300 cataract procedures is therefore most likely justified. Careful selection of low-risk patients for the training surgeons may help in reducing the rate of posterior capsule ruptures during training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42345142014-11-21 Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified? Böhringer, Daniel Vach, Werner Hagenlocher, Kai Eberwein, Philipp Maier, Philip Reinhard, Thomas PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The German Ophthalmological Society (GOS) recently proposed surgical entry criteria, i.e. 300 cataract surgeries. We herein correlate the surgical hands-on experience with the risk of posterior capsule ruptures in order to assess whether this number is appropriate. METHODS: We identified all cataract operations that had been performed at the University Eye Hospital Freiburg since 1995. For each surgeon, we assigned a running number to his/her procedures in the order they had been performed. Thereafter, we excluded all combined procedures and the second eyes. We then selected the 5475 surgical reports between November 2008 and November 2012 for detailed review. We additionally classified each surgery into low- vs. high- à priori risk for posterior capsule ruptures. We fitted a multifactorial logistic regression model to assess the GOS recommendation of 300 surgeries under supervision. In the low-risk group, we additionally visualized the 'typical' learning curve by plotting the posterior capsule ruptures against the respective rank numbers. RESULTS: The odds ratio for posterior capsule ruptures of 'learning-mode' (one of the respective surgeon's 300 first procedures) vs. the non-learning-mode was 3.8 (p<0.0001). By contrast, classification into the low-risk group lowered the risk of posterior capsule ruptures three fold (p<0.0001). According to the low-risk plot, the surgeons started with a complication rate of 4% and continuously improved towards 0.5% after 1500 operations. Thereafter, the rate increased again and stabilized around one percent. CONCLUSION: The learning curve with respect to posterior capsule ruptures is surprisingly flat. The GOS entry criterion of 300 cataract procedures is therefore most likely justified. Careful selection of low-risk patients for the training surgeons may help in reducing the rate of posterior capsule ruptures during training. Public Library of Science 2014-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4234514/ /pubmed/25401738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112819 Text en © 2014 Böhringer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Böhringer, Daniel
Vach, Werner
Hagenlocher, Kai
Eberwein, Philipp
Maier, Philip
Reinhard, Thomas
Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title_full Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title_fullStr Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title_full_unstemmed Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title_short Are Entry Criteria for Cataract Surgery Justified?
title_sort are entry criteria for cataract surgery justified?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25401738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112819
work_keys_str_mv AT bohringerdaniel areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified
AT vachwerner areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified
AT hagenlocherkai areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified
AT eberweinphilipp areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified
AT maierphilip areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified
AT reinhardthomas areentrycriteriaforcataractsurgeryjustified