Cargando…
Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and costly mental disorder. Although commercially available antidepressants have proliferated over the last 20 years, a substantial number of patients either do not respond adequately to these drugs or are unable to tolerate their adverse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25373601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-133 |
_version_ | 1782344896318799872 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yiyun Zhou, Xinyu Qin, Bin Del Giovane, Cinzia Zhang, Yuqing Xie, Peng |
author_facet | Liu, Yiyun Zhou, Xinyu Qin, Bin Del Giovane, Cinzia Zhang, Yuqing Xie, Peng |
author_sort | Liu, Yiyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and costly mental disorder. Although commercially available antidepressants have proliferated over the last 20 years, a substantial number of patients either do not respond adequately to these drugs or are unable to tolerate their adverse effects. One common approach has been to augment conventional antidepressants with an adjunctive agent, but the optimal selection of atypical antipsychotic agents for adjunctive treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains controversial. METHODS/DESIGN: An electronic literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, LiLACS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for studies will be conducted with no restrictions on language, publication year, or publication type. Several clinical trial registry agencies, pharmaceutical company websites, and FDA reports will also be reviewed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression will be considered. Data will be independently extracted by two reviewers. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for RCTs that directly compare different treatment arms. Then, Bayesian network meta-analyses will be performed to compare the relative efficacy and acceptability of different atypical antipsychotic agents (and doses). A sensitivity analysis will be performed by excluding studies classified as a small sample size, having a high placebo effect. DISCUSSION: This systematic review and network meta-analysis will comparatively analyze the efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability profiles of atypical antipsychotic medications used for the adjunctive treatment of TRD. The findings should provide clinically relevant implications for comprehensively understanding the risk–benefit profiles of these adjunctive treatments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 42014009666. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42347392014-11-18 Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Liu, Yiyun Zhou, Xinyu Qin, Bin Del Giovane, Cinzia Zhang, Yuqing Xie, Peng Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and costly mental disorder. Although commercially available antidepressants have proliferated over the last 20 years, a substantial number of patients either do not respond adequately to these drugs or are unable to tolerate their adverse effects. One common approach has been to augment conventional antidepressants with an adjunctive agent, but the optimal selection of atypical antipsychotic agents for adjunctive treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains controversial. METHODS/DESIGN: An electronic literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, LiLACS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for studies will be conducted with no restrictions on language, publication year, or publication type. Several clinical trial registry agencies, pharmaceutical company websites, and FDA reports will also be reviewed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression will be considered. Data will be independently extracted by two reviewers. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for RCTs that directly compare different treatment arms. Then, Bayesian network meta-analyses will be performed to compare the relative efficacy and acceptability of different atypical antipsychotic agents (and doses). A sensitivity analysis will be performed by excluding studies classified as a small sample size, having a high placebo effect. DISCUSSION: This systematic review and network meta-analysis will comparatively analyze the efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability profiles of atypical antipsychotic medications used for the adjunctive treatment of TRD. The findings should provide clinically relevant implications for comprehensively understanding the risk–benefit profiles of these adjunctive treatments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 42014009666. BioMed Central 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4234739/ /pubmed/25373601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-133 Text en Copyright © 2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Liu, Yiyun Zhou, Xinyu Qin, Bin Del Giovane, Cinzia Zhang, Yuqing Xie, Peng Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25373601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyiyun efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhouxinyu efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT qinbin efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT delgiovanecinzia efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangyuqing efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiepeng efficacyqualityoflifeandacceptabilityoutcomesofatypicalantipsychoticaugmentationtreatmentfortreatmentresistantdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |