Cargando…

C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION: Although pedicle or lateral mass screws are usually chosen to fix atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability, there is an increased risk for vertebral artery (VA) injury when used in patients with bone or arterial anomalies or osteoporotic bone. Here we report the C1 posterior arch screw as a ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagoshi, Narihito, Suda, Kota, Morita, Tomonori, Matsumoto, Satoko, Iimoto, Seiji, Yasui, Keigo, Komatsu, Miki, Kobayashi, Yosuke, Minami, Akio, Toyama, Yoshiaki, Matsumoto, Morio, Nakamura, Masaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-672
_version_ 1782344896993034240
author Nagoshi, Narihito
Suda, Kota
Morita, Tomonori
Matsumoto, Satoko
Iimoto, Seiji
Yasui, Keigo
Komatsu, Miki
Kobayashi, Yosuke
Minami, Akio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Matsumoto, Morio
Nakamura, Masaya
author_facet Nagoshi, Narihito
Suda, Kota
Morita, Tomonori
Matsumoto, Satoko
Iimoto, Seiji
Yasui, Keigo
Komatsu, Miki
Kobayashi, Yosuke
Minami, Akio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Matsumoto, Morio
Nakamura, Masaya
author_sort Nagoshi, Narihito
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although pedicle or lateral mass screws are usually chosen to fix atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability, there is an increased risk for vertebral artery (VA) injury when used in patients with bone or arterial anomalies or osteoporotic bone. Here we report the C1 posterior arch screw as a new technique for upper cervical fixation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 90-year-old man complained of upper cervical pain after falling in his house. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed C1-C2 posterior dislocation with a type II odontoid fracture. The patient underwent C2 fracture reduction and posterior C1-C2 fixation. On the right side of C1, because lateral mass screw placement could cause injury to the dominant VA considering a risk in oldest-old osteoporotic patients, a posterior arch screw was chosen instead as an auxiliary anchor. An intralaminar screw was placed on the right side of C2 because a high-riding VA was observed. A lateral mass screw and a pars interarticularis screw were placed on the left side of C1 and C2, respectively. Ten months later, the odontoid fracture had healed, with normal anatomical alignment. Although the patient experienced slight weakness when spreading his bilateral fingers, his overall condition was good. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: We have presented a novel technique using C1 posterior arch screws for the fixation of a C1-C2 dislocation. Such a screw is an alternative to the C1 lateral mass screw in patients who are at risk for a VA injury because of anomalous bone and arterial structures or poor bone quality. CONCLUSIONS: Although there have been few comparable studies, and the long-term outcome is unknown, fixation with a posterior arch screw could be a beneficial choice for surgeries involving the upper cervical region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42347422014-12-05 C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature Nagoshi, Narihito Suda, Kota Morita, Tomonori Matsumoto, Satoko Iimoto, Seiji Yasui, Keigo Komatsu, Miki Kobayashi, Yosuke Minami, Akio Toyama, Yoshiaki Matsumoto, Morio Nakamura, Masaya Springerplus Case Study INTRODUCTION: Although pedicle or lateral mass screws are usually chosen to fix atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability, there is an increased risk for vertebral artery (VA) injury when used in patients with bone or arterial anomalies or osteoporotic bone. Here we report the C1 posterior arch screw as a new technique for upper cervical fixation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 90-year-old man complained of upper cervical pain after falling in his house. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed C1-C2 posterior dislocation with a type II odontoid fracture. The patient underwent C2 fracture reduction and posterior C1-C2 fixation. On the right side of C1, because lateral mass screw placement could cause injury to the dominant VA considering a risk in oldest-old osteoporotic patients, a posterior arch screw was chosen instead as an auxiliary anchor. An intralaminar screw was placed on the right side of C2 because a high-riding VA was observed. A lateral mass screw and a pars interarticularis screw were placed on the left side of C1 and C2, respectively. Ten months later, the odontoid fracture had healed, with normal anatomical alignment. Although the patient experienced slight weakness when spreading his bilateral fingers, his overall condition was good. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: We have presented a novel technique using C1 posterior arch screws for the fixation of a C1-C2 dislocation. Such a screw is an alternative to the C1 lateral mass screw in patients who are at risk for a VA injury because of anomalous bone and arterial structures or poor bone quality. CONCLUSIONS: Although there have been few comparable studies, and the long-term outcome is unknown, fixation with a posterior arch screw could be a beneficial choice for surgeries involving the upper cervical region. Springer International Publishing 2014-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4234742/ /pubmed/25485206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-672 Text en © Nagoshi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Nagoshi, Narihito
Suda, Kota
Morita, Tomonori
Matsumoto, Satoko
Iimoto, Seiji
Yasui, Keigo
Komatsu, Miki
Kobayashi, Yosuke
Minami, Akio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Matsumoto, Morio
Nakamura, Masaya
C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title_full C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title_fullStr C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title_short C1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
title_sort c1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type ii odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-672
work_keys_str_mv AT nagoshinarihito c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT sudakota c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT moritatomonori c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT matsumotosatoko c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT iimotoseiji c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT yasuikeigo c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT komatsumiki c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT kobayashiyosuke c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT minamiakio c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT toyamayoshiaki c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT matsumotomorio c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT nakamuramasaya c1posteriorarchscrewasanauxiliaryanchorinposteriorreconstructionforatlantoaxialdislocationassociatedwithtypeiiodontoidfractureacasereportandreviewoftheliterature