Cargando…

Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-wei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sng, Ban Leong, Woo, David, Leong, Wan Ling, Wang, Hao, Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert, Sia, Alex TH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842
_version_ 1782344906003447808
author Sng, Ban Leong
Woo, David
Leong, Wan Ling
Wang, Hao
Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert
Sia, Alex TH
author_facet Sng, Ban Leong
Woo, David
Leong, Wan Ling
Wang, Hao
Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert
Sia, Alex TH
author_sort Sng, Ban Leong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption. RESULTS: The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes. DISCUSSION: Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42347852014-11-25 Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex TH J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption. RESULTS: The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes. DISCUSSION: Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4234785/ /pubmed/25425774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sng, Ban Leong
Woo, David
Leong, Wan Ling
Wang, Hao
Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert
Sia, Alex TH
Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842
work_keys_str_mv AT sngbanleong comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woodavid comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leongwanling comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wanghao comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT assampryseleynkouibert comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siaalexth comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial