Cargando…
Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-wei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842 |
_version_ | 1782344906003447808 |
---|---|
author | Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex TH |
author_facet | Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex TH |
author_sort | Sng, Ban Leong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption. RESULTS: The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes. DISCUSSION: Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4234785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42347852014-11-25 Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex TH J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption. RESULTS: The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes. DISCUSSION: Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4234785/ /pubmed/25425774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex TH Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sngbanleong comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT woodavid comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leongwanling comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wanghao comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT assampryseleynkouibert comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT siaalexth comparisonofcomputerintegratedpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithnoinitialbasalinfusionversusmoderatebasalinfusionforlaboranddeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |